Wm. T. Burnett Holding LLC, et al. v. Berg Brothers Company, et al.Consent Agreement • December 21st, 2017
Contract Type FiledDecember 21st, 2017Appellant, a neighbor of appellee, may have been an incidental beneficiary of a consent agreement between appellee and the Baltimore City Department of Housing and Community Development (DHCD) that resolved appellee’s appeals of DHCD zoning violation notices, but it was not an intended beneficiary of that agreement. It therefore had no standing to enforce the agreement and no standing to seek a declaratory judgment that the agreement had been breached by appellee. Status as a third-party beneficiary is questionable where the contract is with a government agency and involves a regulatory matter within the statutory jurisdiction of that agency.