Common Contracts
3 similar null contracts by Ryerson Inc.
EX-10.16 9 dex1016.htm FORM OF EXECUTIVE CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT February , 2006 Dear :Illinois • May 5th, 2020
Ryerson Inc. (“RYERSON”) considers it essential to the best interests of its stockholders to foster the continuous employment of key management personnel of RYERSON and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”). In this connection, the Board of Directors of RYERSON (the “Board”) recognizes that, as is the case with many publicly held corporations, the possibility of a change in control may exist and that such possibility, and the uncertainty and questions which it may raise among management, may result in the departure or distraction of management personnel to the detriment of RYERSON and its stockholders.
February , 2006Ryerson Inc. • March 31st, 2006 • Wholesale-metals service centers & offices
Ryerson Inc. (“RYERSON”) considers it essential to the best interests of its stockholders to foster the continuous employment of key management personnel of RYERSON and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”). In this connection, the Board of Directors of RYERSON (the “Board”) recognizes that, as is the case with many publicly held corporations, the possibility of a change in control may exist and that such possibility, and the uncertainty and questions which it may raise among management, may result in the departure or distraction of management personnel to the detriment of RYERSON and its stockholders.
February , 2006 Dear :Ryerson Inc. • March 31st, 2006 • Wholesale-metals service centers & offices
Ryerson Inc. (“RYERSON”) considers it essential to the best interests of its stockholders to foster the continuous employment of key management personnel of RYERSON and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”). In this connection, the Board of Directors of RYERSON (the “Board”) recognizes that, as is the case with many publicly held corporations, the possibility of a change in control may exist and that such possibility, and the uncertainty and questions which it may raise among management, may result in the departure or distraction of management personnel to the detriment of RYERSON and its stockholders.
