Common Contracts

2 similar null contracts

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
November 8th, 2016
  • Filed
    November 8th, 2016

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs are individuals whose Social Security Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”) and/or Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) payments were either denied or terminated and for whom a consultative examination (“CE”) was prepared by Dr. Frank Chen. On February 9, 2015, Plaintiffs, on behalf of a putative class, filed against Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security in her official capacity (the “Acting Commissioner” or “SSA”), a Complaint alleging that SSA improperly relied on CEs from Frank Chen, M.D. Frank Chen performed consultative examinations for the California Disability Determination Service Division (“DDS”) from 2007 through 2013. As of December 30, 2013, the California DDS removed Dr. Chen from its panel of consultative examination providers for reasons related to the quality of his reports, the thoroughness of his examinations, and his manner toward claimants.

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
November 8th, 2016
  • Filed
    November 8th, 2016

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs are individuals whose Social Security Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”) and/or Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) payments were either denied or terminated and for whom a consultative examination (“CE”) was prepared by Dr. Frank Chen. On February 9, 2015, Plaintiffs, on behalf of a putative class, filed against Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security in her official capacity (the “Acting Commissioner” or “SSA”), a Complaint alleging that SSA improperly relied on CEs from Frank Chen, M.D. Frank Chen performed consultative examinations for the California Disability Determination Service Division (“DDS”) from 2007 through 2013. As of December 30, 2013, the California DDS removed Dr. Chen from its panel of consultative examination providers for reasons related to the quality of his reports, the thoroughness of his examinations, and his manner toward claimants.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!