Common Contracts
6 similar General Agreement for Consulting Services contracts
NO. OLGeneral Agreement for Consulting Services • November 13th, 2017 • California
DISPUTE RESOLUTION. CONSULTANT IS ADVISED THAT THIS AGREEMENT REQUIRES THAT CERTAIN DISPUTES BE RESOLVED BY ARBITRATION, AS MORE SPECIFICALLY SET FORTH IN SECTION 21.
CP DEVELOPMENT CO., LP,General Agreement for Consulting Services • February 9th, 2015 • California
DISPUTE RESOLUTION. CONSULTANT IS ADVISED THAT THIS AGREEMENT REQUIRES THAT CERTAIN DISPUTES BE RESOLVED BY ARBITRATION, AS MORE SPECIFICALLY SET FORTH IN SECTION 21.
Consultant: Vendor No. [ ] Contract: Contract Rel Cost Center XXXXX Hunters Point Shipyard Phase 1 CSICode# Description Of Services UOM $ / Unit Qty Extended $’s Cost Code (Description of Services) 0.00000 $0.00 Contract Total $0.00General Agreement for Consulting Services • August 5th, 2014 • California
DISPUTE RESOLUTION. CONSULTANT IS ADVISED THAT THIS AGREEMENT REQUIRES THAT CERTAIN DISPUTES BE RESOLVED BY ARBITRATION, AS MORE SPECIFICALLY SET FORTH IN SECTION 21.
General Agreement for Consulting Services (Hunters Point Shipyard Phase 1)General Agreement for Consulting Services • May 27th, 2014 • California
DISPUTE RESOLUTION. CONSULTANT IS ADVISED THAT THIS AGREEMENT REQUIRES THAT CERTAIN DISPUTES BE RESOLVED BY JUDICIAL REFERENCE OR ARBITRATION, AS MORE SPECIFICALLY SET FORTH IN SECTION 22.
CP DEVELOPMENT CO., LP,General Agreement for Consulting Services • February 27th, 2014 • California
DISPUTE RESOLUTION. CONSULTANT IS ADVISED THAT THIS AGREEMENT REQUIRES THAT CERTAIN DISPUTES BE RESOLVED BY ARBITRATION, AS MORE SPECIFICALLY SET FORTH IN SECTION 23.
General Agreement for Consulting Services (Hunters Point Shipyard Phase 1)General Agreement for Consulting Services • August 6th, 2013 • California
DISPUTE RESOLUTION. CONSULTANT IS ADVISED THAT THIS AGREEMENT REQUIRES THAT CERTAIN DISPUTES BE RESOLVED BY JUDICIAL REFERENCE OR ARBITRATION, AS MORE SPECIFICALLY SET FORTH IN SECTION 22.
