AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO RECEIVABLES PURCHASE AGREEMENT AND AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO PERFORMANCE UNDERTAKINGReceivables Purchase Agreement • February 18th, 2005 • Ceridian Corp /De/ • Services-management consulting services • Illinois
Contract Type FiledFebruary 18th, 2005 Company Industry JurisdictionTHIS AMENDMENT (this “Amendment”) is entered into as of September 30, 2004, among Ceridian Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“Ceridian” or “Performance Guarantor”), Comdata Funding Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“Seller”), Comdata Network, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the “Servicer”) (the Servicer together with Seller, the “Seller Parties” and each a “Seller Party”), each Financial Institution party hereto (the “Financial Institutions”), Jupiter Securitization Corporation (“Jupiter” and, together with the Financial Institutions, the “Purchasers”), and Bank One, NA (Main Office Chicago), as agent for the Purchasers (the “Agent”).
AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO RECEIVABLES PURCHASE AGREEMENT AND AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO PERFORMANCE UNDERTAKINGReceivables Purchase Agreement • February 18th, 2005 • Ceridian Corp /De/ • Services-management consulting services • Illinois
Contract Type FiledFebruary 18th, 2005 Company Industry JurisdictionTHIS AMENDMENT (this “Amendment”) is entered into as of August 4, 2004, among Ceridian Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“Ceridian” or “Performance Guarantor”), Comdata Funding Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“Seller”), Comdata Network, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the “Servicer”) (the Servicer together with Seller, the “Seller Parties” and each a “Seller Party”), each Financial Institution party hereto (the “Financial Institutions”), Jupiter Securitization Corporation (“Jupiter” and, together with the Financial Institutions, the “Purchasers”), and Bank One, NA (Main Office Chicago), as agent for the Purchasers (the “Agent”).