RESOLUTION AGREEMENT PartiesResolution Agreement • March 15th, 2005 • Forgent Networks Inc • Services-computer integrated systems design • Texas
Contract Type FiledMarch 15th, 2005 Company Industry JurisdictionThe parties to this agreement (the “Agreement”), dated this 21st day of December, 2004, are Jenkens & Gilchrist, a Professional Corporation, a Texas professional corporation (“Jenkens”), Forgent Networks, Inc. (“Forgent”), a Delaware corporation, and Compression Labs, Inc. (“CLI”), a Delaware corporation, who are, hereinafter, collectively called the “Parties” or, individually, a “Party” as the context requires.
AGREEMENTLegal Representation Agreement • March 15th, 2005 • Forgent Networks Inc • Services-computer integrated systems design • Texas
Contract Type FiledMarch 15th, 2005 Company Industry JurisdictionThis sets forth the agreement made this 11th day of January, 2005, by and among Forgent Networks, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary Compression Labs, Inc. (“Forgent” or the “Client”), and Godwin Gruber, LLP (“Godwin Gruber” or the “Law Firm”). The Law Firm and the Client are sometimes collectively hereinafter referred to as the “Parties.” Any one of the Parties may be sometimes hereinafter referred to as a “Party.”
PARACHUTE AGREEMENT December 6, 2004Parachute Agreement • March 15th, 2005 • Forgent Networks Inc • Services-computer integrated systems design • Delaware
Contract Type FiledMarch 15th, 2005 Company Industry JurisdictionForgent Networks Inc. (the “Company”) considers it essential to the best interests of its stockholders to foster the continuous employment of key management personnel. In this connection, should the Company receive a proposal from a third party, whether solicited by the Company or unsolicited, concerning a possible sale of the Company’s NetSimplicity Software Business (as hereinafter defined), the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) has determined that it is imperative that the Company be able to rely upon your continued services without concern that you might be distracted by the personal uncertainties and risks that such a proposal might otherwise entail.
AGREEMENTLegal Services Agreement • March 15th, 2005 • Forgent Networks Inc • Services-computer integrated systems design • Texas
Contract Type FiledMarch 15th, 2005 Company Industry JurisdictionThis sets forth the agreement made this 19th day of January, 2005, by and among Forgent Networks, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary Compression Labs, Inc. (“Forgent” or the “Client”), and The Roth Law Firm, P.C. (the “Law Firm”). The Law Firm and the Client are sometimes collectively hereinafter referred to as the “Parties.” Any one of the Parties may be sometimes hereinafter referred to as a “Party.”