EXHIBIT EDevelopment Agreement • March 1st, 2007 • Applebees International Inc • Retail-eating places • Kansas
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ALPENGLOW SUBDIVISIONDevelopment Agreement • November 9th, 2023 • Idaho
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of this_______day of ______________, 20___ , by and between 3000 NORTH PARTNERS, an LLC, (the “Developer”) and Teton County Idaho, a political subdivision of the State of Idaho (the “County”).
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTDevelopment Agreement • March 6th, 2017
(Each of Authority and the Developer shall hereinafter be individually referred to as a "Party" and collectively as the "Parties".)
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT CROSSED ARROWS SUBDIVISIONDevelopment Agreement • December 30th, 2022 • Idaho
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of the day of , 2022, by and between Flyway LLC and/or assigns (hereafter “Developer”) and Teton County Idaho, a political subdivision of the State of Idaho (hereafter “County”).
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEENDevelopment Agreement • June 27th, 2019 • California
Game Development AgreementDevelopment Agreement • April 4th, 2024
hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Parties", and each individually as a "Party", concluded this Agreement for the provision of services (hereinafter referred to as the "Agreement", “Contract”) on the following:
SECOND AMENDMENT TODevelopment Agreement • November 23rd, 2022 • Wisconsin
Commented [MB1]: Formal document to be considered by RDA/Council will match format of Amendment 1. This redlined copy is to help coordinate on proposed changes.
FROM: Erik Glavich, Director, Growth & Opportunity SUBJECT: Liberty Tower Development AgreementDevelopment Agreement • April 11th, 2023 • Indiana
This Agreement specifies that (1) the Funding Amount provided by Redevelopment Commission will not exceed $1.6 million and (2) the Private Investment by the Developer will be no less than
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTDevelopment Agreement • June 18th, 2015 • North Carolina
The following articles/sections have been revised, with the approval on June 15, 2015, of this Agreement. Revisions are highlighted in grey in the body of the document.
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEENDevelopment Agreement • August 11th, 2009 • North Carolina
This Development Agreement (hereinafter the “Agreement”) is made and entered into as of the 1st day of July 2009 by and between The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (hereinafter the “University”), a public entity authorized to conduct business in the State of North Carolina, and the Town of Chapel Hill, North Carolina (hereinafter the “Town”), a municipal corporation of the State of North Carolina.
Exhibit 10.7 AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO RESEARCH, COLLABORATION AND LICENSE/DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN TULARIK INC. AND TAISHO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD. THIS AMENDMENT NO. 2 (this "Amendment") to the Research, Collaboration and License/Development Agreement...Development Agreement • December 17th, 1999 • Tularik Inc • Services-commercial physical & biological research • Tokyo
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THEDevelopment Agreement • October 11th, 2019 • California
, 2019, by and between Stanislaus County, a body corporate and a political subdivision of the State of California (hereafter “County”) and MDS Business Services, LLC., a limited liability company (hereafter “Permittee”) pursuant to the authority of §§ 65864 et seq., of the California Government Code and Stanislaus County Code, Title 22. County and Permittee are, from time-to-time, individually referred to in this Agreement as a “Party,” and are collectively referred to as “Parties.”
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTDevelopment Agreement • September 8th, 2022 • California
THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”) is made and entered into this day of , 2022 (the “Execution Date”), by and between the CITY OF COLUSA, a California municipal corporation (“City”) and Joel Gonzalez Extracts CA (“Owner”). City and Owner are sometimes referenced together herein as the “Parties.” In instances when a provision hereof applies to each of the Parties individually, either may be referenced as a “Party.” The Parties hereby jointly render the following statement as to the background facts and circumstances underlying this Agreement.
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THEDevelopment Agreement • March 1st, 2016
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEENDevelopment Agreement • August 3rd, 2017 • California
Recording Requested by and When Recorded Mail To:Development Agreement • October 7th, 2020 • Nevada
The undersigned hereby affirms that this document submitted for recording does not contain the personal information of any person or persons per N.R.S. 239B.030. Signature of Declarant or Agent
Port Kennedy Development Agreement Act 1992Development Agreement • February 18th, 2020
This instrument prepared by and should be returned to:Development Agreement • March 6th, 2024 • Florida
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTDevelopment Agreement • May 5th, 2020 • Florida
THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) is made and entered into as of this day of November, 2015 (the “Effective Date”), by and between CBV LLC, a Florida limited liability company (the “Developer”) and the HALLANDALE BEACH COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, a body public and corporate of the State of Florida (the “CRA”).
PARAGRAPH NOS. PAGEDevelopment Agreement • November 26th, 2014 • Alberta
RECITALS 1 - 2 PART I – ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS A Definitions 1.01 2 - 11 B Scope of Agreement 1.02 11 C Notices 1.03 12 D Registration of Agreement 1.04 - 1.05 12 E Obligations as Covenants 1.06 13 F Applicable Law 1.07 13 G Interpretation of Agreement 1.08 13 - 14 H Waiver 1.09 14 I Time 1.10 14 J Successors and Assigns 1.11 14 K Warranty 1.12 14 - 15 L Recitals and Schedules 1.13 15 M Special Clauses 1.14 - 1.15 15 N Performance of Obligations 1.16 15 O Term of Agreement 1.17 15 - 16 P Strikes and Lockouts 1.18 16 PART II – GENERAL CONSTRUCTION OBLIGATIONS 2.01 - 2.08 16 - 19 PART III – ASSESSMENT LEVIES A Storm Sewer 3.01 19 B Utility Oversize 3.02 19 C Major Road Standard Oversize 3.03 19 D Transportation 3.04 19 E Traffic Signage and Road Markings 3.05 19 F Community and District Parks 3.06 19 G Community and Recreation 3.07 20 H Inspection Fee 3.08 20 I Sanitary Sewer 3.09 20 J Water 3.10 20 PART IV – PLANS 4.01 - 4.13 20 - 22 PART V – SANITARY SEWERS A Installation 5.01 - 5
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 20-02Development Agreement • July 14th, 2021 • California
, 2021 by and between the City of Costa Mesa, California (hereinafter “CITY”), and International Asset Management Holding Group, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company (hereinafter “OWNER”):
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT by and among THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES and NOHO DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES, LLCDevelopment Agreement • July 5th, 2023 • California
This Development Agreement (“Agreement”) is executed this day of , 2022, by and between the CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal corporation (“City”), and NOHO DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES, LLC, a Delaware limited liability corporation (“Developer”), pursuant to California Government Code Section 65864 et seq., and the implementing procedures of the City, with respect to the following:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ) DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT COUNTY OF JASPER ) PORT LOGISTICSDevelopment Agreement • June 9th, 2023 • South Carolina
This Development Agreement (“Agreement”) is made effective , 2023, by and between HCP Partners LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company, (“Owner”) and the Governmental authority of the City of Hardeeville, South Carolina (“City”).
ROCK CHALK PARK DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTDevelopment Agreement • July 16th, 2013 • Kansas
Unit Quantity Unit Cost Total Mobilization LS 1 $400,000.00 $400,000.00 Construction Staking LS 1 $225,000.00 $225,000.00 Seeding, Mulching & Fertilizing AC 20 $1,500.00 $30,000.00 Utilities Connection fees and expenses LS 1 $55,000.00 $55,000.00 Traffic Control LS 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 Erosion & Sediment Control LS 1 $40,000.00 $40,000.00 Legal Fees per Development Agreement LS 1 $167,836.00 $167,836.00 Loan origination fees for project financing LS 1 $150,000.00 $150,000.00 Loan interest for project financing LS 1 $309,515.00 $309,515.00 Construction Management fee 2.5% on $11,350,317.65 LS 1 $283,758.00 $283,758.00 Professional Engineering Fees LS 1 $525,000.00 $525,000.00 General Total: $2,191,109.00
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTDevelopment Agreement • November 29th, 2022 • Nevada
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTDevelopment Agreement • September 19th, 2022 • Idaho
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of the day of , 20 , by and between BOWENARROW LLC and/or assigns (hereafter “Developer”) and Teton County Idaho, a political subdivision of the State of Idaho (hereafter “County”).
AMENDED AND RESTATED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR ANARENE INVESTMENTS TRACTDevelopment Agreement • September 15th, 2021 • Texas
WHEREAS, Anarene and the City entered into that certain Development Agreement effective as of October 17, 2012 (the "Original Agreement"), which was recorded in Volume 4466, Page 327 of the Official Public Records of Hays County, Texas; and
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTDevelopment Agreement • September 14th, 2023
This Development Agreement (“Agreement”) is entered into this day of _ , 2023, by and between the City of Joshua, Texas (“City”), and _ landowner,” whether singularly or collectively). Landowner and the City are sometimes referred herein together as the “Parties” and individually as a “Party.”
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF PELHAMDevelopment Agreement • September 9th, 2019
WHEREAS the Developer covenants and warrants that it is the owner of the Lands which are described in Schedule “A” hereto annexed;
FILE NO. PDA21-004 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTDevelopment Agreement • November 30th, 2021 • California
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY THE LANDLORDSDevelopment Agreement • October 6th, 2023
A, son of S, resident of .. (5) B, son of T, resident of .., and (6) Smt. C, son of U, resident of .., hereinafter called "the Vendors" (which expression shall unless repugnant to the context or meaning thereof mean and include their respective heirs, executors, administrators and assigns) of the FIRST PART; Smt. N wife of Shri M, resident of .., hereinafter called "the Confirming Party" (which expression shall unless repugnant to the context or meaning thereof mean and include her heirs, executors, administrators and assigns) of the SECOND PART and ... a partnership firm through its Partner, D, son of F, resident of , hereinafter
Exhibit B Ordinance No. 18- Development AgreementDevelopment Agreement • June 5th, 2018 • California
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTDevelopment Agreement • July 16th, 2019 • Washington
THIS AGREEMENT is entered this day of , 2019 by and between MGP XII SB Aurora, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Developer”), or its assignee, and the City of Shoreline, a Washington municipal corporation (“City”). Developer and the City are each a “Party” and collectively the “Parties” to this Agreement.
Development Agreement Between the City of Durham and McCormack Baron Salazar, Inc.Development Agreement • May 5th, 2020 • Durham County
day of , 2012, by and between the City of Durham, North Carolina a public body organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of North Carolina (“City”) and McCormack Baron Salazar, Inc., a Missouri corporation (“Developer” or “MBS”).
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT SHOWING PROPOSED AMENDMENTSDevelopment Agreement • January 6th, 2020 • Washington
This Development Agreement (this “Agreement”) is entered into by and between CLARK COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Washington (the “County”) and MILL CREEK JV LLC (hereinafter referred to as “Holt” or “Developer,” which terms include any successor to, or assignee of, Mill Creek JV LLC), WILFRED N ZILKE FAMILY TRUST (hereinafter
