INTERSTATE AGREEMENT ON DETAINERSInterstate Agreement on Detainers • February 28th, 2024
AN ACT to ratify and enact the agreement on detainers into the laws of the state; to provide for the administration and enforcement of the agreement; and to provide penalties for violation of this act.
ContractInterstate Agreement on Detainers • January 19th, 2023
This Agreement on Detainers is hereby enacted into law and entered into by this State with all other jurisdictions legally joining therein in the form substantially as follows: The contracting states solemnly agree:
ContractInterstate Agreement on Detainers • October 12th, 2022
INTERSTATE AGREEMENT ON DETAINERSInterstate Agreement on Detainers • November 9th, 2023
Page 5 TITLE 18, APPENDIX—INTERSTATE AGREEMENT ON DETAINERS § 9Interstate Agreement on Detainers • November 9th, 2023
INTERSTATE AGREEMENT ON DETAINERSInterstate Agreement on Detainers • November 9th, 2023
INTERSTATE AGREEMENT ON DETAINERSInterstate Agreement on Detainers • September 23rd, 2019
Page 5 TITLE 18, APPENDIX—INTERSTATE AGREEMENT ON DETAINERS § 9Interstate Agreement on Detainers • June 27th, 2024
All courts, departments, agencies, officers, and employees of the United States and of the District of Columbia are hereby directed to en- force the agreement on detainers and to cooper- ate with one another and with all party States in enforcing the agreement and effectuating its purpose.
ContractInterstate Agreement on Detainers • October 26th, 2019
ContractInterstate Agreement on Detainers • January 13th, 2023
ContractInterstate Agreement on Detainers • October 1st, 2019
The Agreement on Detainers is hereby enacted into law and entered into by this State with all other jurisdictions legally joining therein in the form substantially as follows:
ContractInterstate Agreement on Detainers • June 30th, 2022 • Idaho
Interstate Agreement on Detainers – General Application – Pending Charges in Sending StateInterstate Agreement on Detainers • October 7th, 2010
This case calls upon us to construe the Interstate Agreement on Detainers (“IAD”), codified at Maryland Code (1999, 2008 Repl. Vol.), §§ 8-401 to 8-417 of the Correctional Services Article.1 In particular, we are asked to determine whether the Circuit Court for Cecil County correctly interpreted the IAD to require dismissal of the criminal charges against Appellee, Caleb Micha Pair, on the ground that Appellant, the State of Maryland (“the State”), failed to comply with the 180-day speedy trial period set forth in the IAD. The State appealed the Circuit Court’s decision to the Court of Special Appeals. We issued a writ of certiorari before briefing and argument in that court. For the following reasons, we affirm the Circuit Court’s judgment of dismissal.
Plaintiff, ) INTERSTATE AGREEMENT ONInterstate Agreement on Detainers • May 9th, 2016
On May 9, 2016, defendant made his initial appearance and was arraigned in the above- entitled action. SAUSA Dawn Dietz appeared on the Government’s behalf. Attorney Kent Morrow appeared on defendant’s behalf.
INTERSTATE AGREEMENT ON DETAINERSInterstate Agreement on Detainers • January 27th, 2020
AN ACT to ratify and enact the agreement on detainers into the laws of the state; to provide for the administration and enforcement of the agreement; and to provide penalties for violation of this act.
MRS Title 34-A, §9601. PURPOSE AND POLICY--ARTICLE IInterstate Agreement on Detainers • March 20th, 2018
INTERSTATE AGREEMENT ON DETAINERS - FORM 2Interstate Agreement on Detainers • November 28th, 2017
Six copies, if only one jurisdiction within the state involved has an indictment, information or complaint pending. Additional copies will be necessary for prosecuting officials and clerks of court if detainers have been lodged by other jurisdictions within the state involved. One copy should be retained by the offender. One signed copy should be retained by the institution. Signed copies must be sent to the Agreement Administrators of the sending and receiving states. The prosecuting official of the jurisdiction which placed the detainer, and the clerk of the court which has jurisdiction over the matter. The copies for the prosecuting officials and the court must be transmitted by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested.
Plaintiff, ) INTERSTATE AGREEMENT ONInterstate Agreement on Detainers • September 9th, 2019
On September 9, 2019, defendant made her initial appearance and was arraigned in the above-entitled action. AUSA Rick Volk appeared on behalf of the United States. Attorney Scott Brand was appointed to represent defendant in this matter and appeared on his behalf.
Interstate Agreement DetainersInterstate Agreement on Detainers • February 22nd, 2022
California Penal Code Section 1389 PC, “The Agreement on Detainers,” allows the state that has outstanding charges or untried indictments against an incarcerated individual who is currently incarcerated in another jurisdiction, to be transported to the state seeking prosecution. These proceedings are solely initiated by the San Diego County District Attorney’s Office.
INTERSTATE AGREEMENT ON DETAINERS (EXCERPT)Interstate Agreement on Detainers • November 29th, 2021 • Michigan
INTERSTATE AGREEMENT ON DETAINERS – Form 4Interstate Agreement on Detainers • November 28th, 2017
And to all other prosecuting officers and courts of jurisdictions listed below from which indictments, information or complaints are pending.
INTERSTATE AGREEMENT ON DETAINERS (EXCERPT)Interstate Agreement on Detainers • September 24th, 2021
Interstate Agreement on Detainers – Form 3Interstate Agreement on Detainers • May 15th, 2017
In the case of an Offender’s request to disposition under Article III, copies of the form should be attached to all copies of Form II. In the case of a request initiated by a prosecutor under Article IV, a copy of this form should be sent to the prosecutor upon receipt by the Warden of Form V. Copies of this form should be sent to all other prosecutors in the same state who have lodged detainers against the Offender. A copy may be given to the Offender.
INTERSTATE AGREEMENT ON DETAINERS (EXCERPT)Interstate Agreement on Detainers • January 7th, 2022
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA SOUTHWESTERN DIVISIONInterstate Agreement on Detainers • January 20th, 2010
On January 20, 201, Defendant Clifford Scott Eaton ("Eaton") made his initial appearance in the above-entitled action and was arraigned. Special Assistant United States Attorney July Lawyer appeared on the Government's behalf. Attorney Michael Hoffman was appointed as defense counsel and appeared on Eaton's behalf.
INTERSTATE AGREEMENT ON DETAINERSInterstate Agreement on Detainers • November 1st, 2018
AN ACT to ratify and enact the agreement on detainers into the laws of the state; to provide for the administration and enforcement of the agreement; and to provide penalties for violation of this act.
Page 5 TITLE 18, APPENDIX—INTERSTATE AGREEMENT ON DETAINERS § 9Interstate Agreement on Detainers • November 24th, 2019
to the United States, the courts of the United States, and with respect to the District of Co- lumbia, the courts of the District of Columbia, in which indictments, informations, or com- plaints, for which disposition is sought, are pending.
Page 5 TITLE 18, APPENDIX—INTERSTATE AGREEMENT ON DETAINERS § 9Interstate Agreement on Detainers • November 9th, 2023
Plaintiff, ) INTERSTATE AGREEMENT ONInterstate Agreement on Detainers • April 9th, 2024
On April 9, 2024, Defendant made her initial appearance in the above-entitled action and was arraigned. AUSA Rick Volk appeared on behalf of the United States. Attorney Magdalena Brockel appeared on Defendant’s behalf.
Plaintiff, ) INTERSTATE AGREEMENT ONInterstate Agreement on Detainers • March 16th, 2017
On March 16, 2017, defendant made his initial appearance and was arraigned in the above- entitled action. AUSA Jonathan O'Konek appeared on the Government’s behalf. Assistant Federal Public Defender Ryan Costello appeared on defendant’s behalf.
FORM I INTERSTATE AGREEMENT ON DETAINERSInterstate Agreement on Detainers • September 20th, 2019
One copy of this form, signed by the inmate and the warden, should be retained by the warden. One copy, signed by the warden should be retained by the inmate.
Plaintiff, ) INTERSTATE AGREEMENT ONInterstate Agreement on Detainers • June 28th, 2017
On June 28, 2017, defendant made his initial appearance and was arraigned in the above- entitled action. AUSA David Hagler appeared on the Government’s behalf. Attorney Dan Herbel was appointed to represent defendant in ths matter and appeared on defendant’s behalf.
INTERSTATE AGREEMENT ON DETAINERSInterstate Agreement on Detainers • April 20th, 2023
AN ACT to ratify and enact the agreement on detainers into the laws of the state; to provide for the administration and enforcement of the agreement; and to provide penalties for violation of this act.
INTERSTATE AGREEMENT ON DETAINERS: FORM V-AInterstate Agreement on Detainers • September 27th, 2002
Five copies. One copy is to be retained by the inmate and one copy is to be retained for the institution file. Three copies are to be sent to the Florida Agreement Administrator. The Florida Agreement Administrator will forward copies to the Prosecutor , the Agreement Administrator in the receiving state and retain one copy for Central Records, Central Office.
Plaintiff, ) INTERSTATE AGREEMENT ONInterstate Agreement on Detainers • November 18th, 2016
On November 18, 2016, defendant was arraigned in the above-entitled action. SAUSA Dawn Dietz appeared on the Government’s behalf. Attorney James Martens and appeared on defendant’s behalf.
