UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTAMaster Settlement Agreement • December 16th, 2010
WHEREAS, the parties have entered into a Master Settlement Agreement dated October 8, 2010 (hereinafter “the MSA”), which encompasses the above-referenced matter, various related state court actions, including the coordinated proceedings venued in Hennepin County, and certain additional retained claimants as defined in the MSA;
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTAMaster Settlement Agreement • December 16th, 2010
WHEREAS the parties have entered into a Master Settlement Agreement dated October 8, 2010 (hereinafter “the MSA”), which encompasses the above-referenced matter, various related state court actions, including the coordinated proceedings venued in Hennepin County, and certain additional retained claimants as defined in the MSA;
RECITALS --------Master Settlement Agreement • November 6th, 2006 • Finova Group Inc • Short-term business credit institutions • Delaware
68-West–Statehouse | 300 SW 10th Ave. | Topeka, Kansas 66612-1504Master Settlement Agreement • November 17th, 2020
In 1998, Kansas became 1 of 46 states to accept a tobacco settlement negotiated with 4 major tobacco companies. [Note: The remaining four states settled individually.] The settlement, called the Master Settlement Agreement, was aimed at reducing the use of tobacco by young persons, settling legal claims by states against the tobacco industry, and providing reimbursement for health care costs of treating Medicaid patients whose illnesses were caused by tobacco. Under terms of the agreement, the tobacco industry is prohibited from targeting youth in marketing and is subject to restrictions concerning sponsorships, advertising, and tobacco promotions.
This PDF is a selection from a published volume from the National Bureau of Economic ResearchMaster Settlement Agreement • December 6th, 2012
Volume Title: Regulation vs. Litigation: Perspectives from Economics and Law Volume Author/Editor: Daniel P. Kessler, editor
The Master Settlement Agreement: An OverviewMaster Settlement Agreement • February 15th, 2017
MASTER SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTMaster Settlement Agreement • April 28th, 2015 • Illinois
This Master Settlement Agreement, dated April 28, 2015 (the “Execution Date”), is entered into by and between (i) Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited and Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. (collectively, “Takeda”), and (ii) the plaintiffs’ counsel listed in the signature pages hereto under the heading “Plaintiffs’ Settlement Review Committee” (“PSRC”). Takeda and the PSRC have agreed to establish a private settlement program intended to resolve the claims of all persons who are eligible to enroll into the private settlement program, as set forth by the terms of this Agreement.
MASTER SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTMaster Settlement Agreement • July 28th, 2017 • New Jersey
This Master Settlement Agreement, dated August 1, 2017 (the “Execution Date”), is entered into by and between (i) Daiichi Sankyo, Inc., Daiichi Sankyo U.S. Holdings, Inc., and Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd. (collectively, “Daiichi Sankyo”), (ii) Forest Laboratories, Inc., now known as Forest Laboratories, LLC, Forest Research Institute, Inc., and Forest Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (collectively, “Forest”), and (iii) the plaintiffs’ counsel listed in the signature pages hereto under the heading “Plaintiffs’ Negotiating Committee” (“PNC”). Daiichi Sankyo, Forest and the PNC have agreed to establish a private settlement program intended to resolve the claims of all persons who are eligible to enroll into the private settlement program, as set forth by the terms of this Agreement.
Introduction to the Master Settlement AgreementMaster Settlement Agreement • May 8th, 2015
• Several states sued major tobacco companies in the 1990s to recover Medicaid costs and other damages related to tobacco healthcare
MASTER SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTMaster Settlement Agreement • July 11th, 2013 • New Jersey
This Master Settlement Agreement, dated February 7, 2014 (the “Execution Date”), is entered into by and between (i) Organon USA, Inc. (“Organon”), and (ii) the plaintiffs’ counsel listed in the signature pages hereto under the heading “Negotiating Plaintiffs’ Counsel” (“NPC”).
Tobacco’s Master Settlement Agreement: How Funds Are Allocated in GeorgiaMaster Settlement Agreement • October 10th, 2018
Georgia CORE is a public-private partnership that connects cancer care providers, leaders, organizations, and advocates throughout the state. Led by a Board of Directors of cancer experts from academic institutions, hospitals and cancer centers, collaboration orchestrated by Georgia CORE improves access to clinical trials, personalized cancer care and support for patients, survivors, and caregivers. It created GeorgiaCancerInfo.org, the only statewide online information center of its kind, where details can be found on oncologists, clinical trials and treatment centers throughout the state.
Master Settlement Agreement Attorney General - Department of Law Program SummaryMaster Settlement Agreement • August 19th, 2021
In the 1990s, states began suing cigarette companies for public health costs related to tobacco consumption. These lawsuits resulted in the Master Settlement Agreement (MSA), a contract between the 4 largest cigarette manufacturers and 46 states, including Arizona, the District of Columbia, and 6 territories. The MSA was signed by all parties in November of 1998.
ContractMaster Settlement Agreement • May 5th, 2020
This part sets forth definitions in the Master Settlement Agreement that are cross-referenced in Part 2, Model Tobacco Settlement Statute. This part is intended for convenience only and may not be construed as substantively or otherwise altering Part 2, Model Tobacco Settlement Statute, or the Master Settlement Agreement. Where Part 2, Model Tobacco Settlement Statute, instructs that a term be given the same definition as that term is given in the Master Settlement Agreement, the definition shall be that set forth in the Master Settlement Agreement, as it may be amended from time to time.
The Master Settlement AgreementMaster Settlement Agreement • February 21st, 2023
• After decades of deception and misinformation, by the late 1990s the harm caused by cigarettes was well known. Many states sued major tobacco companies to recover Medicaid costs and damages caused by this uniquely deadly consumer product.
68-West–Statehouse, 300 SW 10th Ave.Master Settlement Agreement • January 18th, 2017
In 1998, Kansas became 1 of 46 states to accept a tobacco settlement negotiated with four major tobacco companies. (The remaining 4 states settled individually.) The settlement, called the Master Settlement Agreement, was aimed at reducing the use of tobacco by young persons, settling legal claims by states against the tobacco industry, and providing reimbursement for health care costs of treating Medicaid patients whose illnesses were caused by tobacco. Under terms of the agreement, the tobacco industry is prohibited from targeting youth in marketing and is subject to restrictions concerning sponsorships, advertising, and tobacco promotions.
Master Settlement AgreementMaster Settlement Agreement • April 15th, 2024
This Master Settlement Agreement is made by the undersigned Settling State officials (on behalf of their respective Settling States) and the undersigned Participating Manufacturers to settle and resolve with finality all Released Claims against the Participating Manufacturers and related
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICEMaster Settlement Agreement • December 29th, 2023
MASTER SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTMaster Settlement Agreement • May 5th, 2020 • New Jersey
This Master Settlement Agreement, dated February 7, 2014 (the “Execution Date”), is entered into by and between (i) Organon USA, Inc. (“Organon”), and (ii) the plaintiffs’ counsel listed in the signature pages hereto under the heading “Negotiating Plaintiffs’ Counsel” (“NPC”).
2.016 billion annual payment obligation for 2006 as specified in the Master Settlement Agreement (MSA).Master Settlement Agreement • July 27th, 2015
The MSA is an agreement reached in 1998 among 46 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and four U.S. territories and the major tobacco companies. As agreed to by all the signatories, a tobacco company is due a credit against its annual payment if the disadvantages imposed by the MSA were a significant factor in the participating manufacturers losing market share. Last month, an independent economic consulting firm hired by the states and the tobacco companies made such a determination with respect to 2003.
ContractMaster Settlement Agreement • May 29th, 2014
05/28/2014 Doc. 515 MINUTE ORDER: The parties have entered into a Master Settlement Agreement intended to cover all cases, included in this MDL. As such, 510 the prior stay Order issued by this Court remains in full effect for the indefinite future. Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 5/28/2014. (dsw) (Entered: 05/28/2014)
ContractMaster Settlement Agreement • May 26th, 2016
Master Settlement Agreement FormMaster Settlement Agreement • May 19th, 2022
The master settlement enough to almost equivalent experience. Vista or settlement agreement forms must keep a form be implemented, including programs including ntc. What is big tobacco worth? Superior Court, directors, No. 3751 Special Fee on Certain Cigarettes and Cigarette. PL Tobacco Settlement and Tobacco Directory Attorney. Foreign exchange commission would have a form should be coordinated program and executive officers or cannot. MYO cigarette operations consisted solely of the marketing and distribution of finished MYO premium cigarette papers, unconditional, financial position or cash flows of the Company either in the intermediate or long term. Master Settlement Agreement Arizona Attorney General. Learn about the 199 settlement between the attorneys general of 51 US states and territories and tobacco companies. Financing costs allegedly caused an opinion on all amounts reported information? The msa payments are also subject to the independent investment banking firm is not li
Ameriquest Settlement:Master Settlement Agreement • October 18th, 2006
In January, 49 states (including Georgia) and the District of Columbia entered into a Master Settlement Agreement with ACC Capital Holdings Corporation, and the following subsidiaries; Ameriquest Mortgage Company, Town & Country Credit Corporation, and AMC Mortgage Services, Inc. f/k/a Bedford Home Loans (hereinafter “Ameriquest”), to resolve the concerns of the states about Ameriquest’s lending practices from January 1, 1999 to December 31, 2005. A provision of that Master Settlement Agreement required that all 49 states and the District of Columbia file either civil or administrative actions against Ameriquest in their individual states by March 21, 2006, and Orders be entered in each of those actions adopting the terms of the Master Settlement Agreement. The Georgia Department of Banking and Finance (hereinafter “Department) and the Governor’s Office of Consumer Affairs agreed to the terms of the Master Settlement Agreement on behalf of the State of Georgia. A Complaint For Injuncti
Republic of Argentina Master Settlement AgreementMaster Settlement Agreement • February 17th, 2016
This Master Settlement Agreement (the “Agreement” or the “Settlement Agreement”) is dated as of February 8, 2016, and is made, in accordance with the terms of the Proposal (as defined below), between the Republic of Argentina (the “Republic”) and the Holder identified in item (i) of the Agreement Schedule signed by the parties in connection with this Agreement (such Agreement Schedule, when executed and exchanged by the Republic and the Holder, being an integral part of this Settlement Agreement). The Holder holds defaulted Republic of Argentina bonds as described in the Agreement Schedule.
MASTER SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTMaster Settlement Agreement • February 1st, 2018
COMBAT ARMS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTMaster Settlement Agreement • August 28th, 2023 • New York
This Master Settlement Agreement (“the Settlement” or the “MSA”), dated August 29, 2023 between: (1) 3M Company (“3M”) and Aearo Technologies LLC, an acquired subsidiary of 3M (“Aearo”) (collectively, along with 3M Occupational Safety, Aearo Holding LLC, Aearo Intermediate LLC, and Aearo LLC, collectively (“Aearo”), and along with 3M, collectively “Defendants”); and (2) the undersigned Plaintiffs’ Leadership in In re Combat Arms Earplug Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2885, U.S.D.C. for the Northern District of Florida (“MDL Court”); and (3) the undersigned Plaintiffs’ Leadership in the Minnesota coordinated state court action pending in the 4th Judicial District, County of Hennepin, Minnesota, File No. 27-CV-19- 19916 (“MN Court”), collectively the “Negotiating Plaintiffs’ Counsel” (“NPC”). Defendants and the NPC are each a “Party,” and, together with the NPC, are the “Parties.”
MASTER SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT RESTRICTIONS ON TOBACCO COMPANY LOBBYING EFFORTSMaster Settlement Agreement • June 28th, 2011
This language bars the tobacco companies (or their lobbyists, front groups, etc.) from taking any action to reduce their payments to the states or to invalidate any of the marketing restrictions in the MSA. But it does not bar them from interpreting the MSA in a way that is most favorable to the tobacco industry or from trying to get the courts to adopt such favorable interpretations.
ContractMaster Settlement Agreement • July 17th, 2006
Ten Years and 1 Master Settlement Agreement Later: The Nature and Frequency of Alcohol and Tobacco Promotion in Televised Sports, 2000 Through 2002
The Master Settlement AgreementMaster Settlement Agreement • October 6th, 2017
Through April 2017, Pennsylvania has received $6.5 billion from the nation’s major tobacco manufacturers since the 1998 Master Settlement Agreement between 46 states and those companies. All MSA payments are deposited into the Tobacco Settlement Fund, established by Act 77 of 2001, and are used to support health-related programs.
Master Settlement Agreement Overview 2024Master Settlement Agreement • April 24th, 2024
In 1998, the Master Settlement Agreement was reached between 52 states and territories and the 4 largest tobacco companies in the United States
Master Settlement AgreementMaster Settlement Agreement • September 3rd, 2013
This budget unit accounts for proceeds received from the tobacco lawsuit Master Settlement Agreement (MSA). In late 1998, a settlement was reached in a lawsuit filed by states against the tobacco industry. In California, the proceeds of the settlement are divided equally between the state and local governments who partnered in the lawsuit. Payments to local governments are based on a formula involving total tobacco sales and each local entity’s population.
ANTITRUST IMMUNITY UP IN SMOKE: PREEMPTION, STATE ACTION, AND THE MASTER SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTMaster Settlement Agreement • December 12th, 2012
The federal antitrust laws, particularly the Sherman Act, are “the Magna Carta of free enterprise.”1 They regulate various business prac- tices based on the likelihood that those practices harm consumers by re- ducing economic efficiency.2 These laws target private actors.3 Some- times, state regulation of business also has anticompetitive effects that harm consumers. The state action doctrine allows a state to take these
2.005 billion annual payment obligation for 2007 as specified in the Master Settlement Agreement (MSA).Master Settlement Agreement • July 27th, 2015
The MSA is an agreement reached in 1998 among 46 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and four U.S. territories and the major tobacco companies. As agreed to by all the signatories, a tobacco company is due a credit against its annual payment if the disadvantages imposed by the MSA were a significant factor in the participating manufacturers losing market share to non participating manufacturers (NPM). In February, an independent economic consulting firm hired jointly by the states and the tobacco companies made such a determination with respect to 2004.
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERALMaster Settlement Agreement • June 13th, 2001
Introduction to the Master Settlement AgreementMaster Settlement Agreement • April 18th, 2017
• Several states sued major tobacco companies in the 1990s to recover Medicaid costs and other damages related to tobacco healthcare
