EXHIBIT (d)(2) STOCK PLEDGE AGREEMENT This Stock Pledge Agreement (the "Agreement") is made on this _____ day of December, 1995 by and between RICHARD KATCHER, as Successor Trustee of the Masoni Trust (as defined below), hereinafter "Katcher", BRYAN...Stock Pledge Agreement • October 2nd, 2000 • Fair Grounds Corp • Services-racing, including track operation • Ohio
ELEVENTH AMENDMENT TO SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED AGREEMENT OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP OF VORNADO REALTY L.P. --------------------------------------------- Dated as of November 24, 1999 THIS ELEVENTH AMENDMENT TO THE SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED AGREEMENT...Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership • December 23rd, 1999 • Vornado Realty Trust • Real estate investment trusts
EXHIBIT 10.5 MASTER NATURAL GAS GATHERING AGREEMENT THIS MASTER NATURAL GAS GATHERING AGREEMENT is made as of February 2, 2000, among ATLAS PIPELINE PARTNERS, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, and ATLAS PIPELINE OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P., a...Master Natural Gas Gathering Agreement • April 11th, 2006 • Atlas Pipeline Holdings, L.P. • Crude petroleum & natural gas
For Whom the Agreement Tolls: Tolling Agreements May Not Toll Claims Against Non-Signatory DefendantsTolling Agreement • April 21st, 2024
In Seniah Corp. v. Buckingham, Doolittle & Burroughs, LLP, Ohio’s Fifth District Court of Appeals ruled in favor of a defendant attorney because the legal malpractice claims at issue—which are subject to a one-year statute of limitations—were time-barred. 5th Dist. Stark No. 2017CA00109, 2018-
Snyder et al., Appellants, v. Lindsay et al., Appellees.Settlement Agreement • September 13th, 2024
Interest—Settlement agreement—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed as to award of interest—Court of appeals’ judgment of remand for an evidentiary hearing reversed—Interest to be computed from date of settlement, consistent with Hartmann v. Duffey.
Snyder et al., Appellants, v. Lindsay et al., Appellees.Settlement Agreement • July 2nd, 2004
Interest — Settlement agreement — Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed as to award of interest — Court of appeals’ judgment of remand for an evidentiary hearing reversed — Interest to be computed from date of settlement, consistent with Hartmann v. Duffey.
Business Settlement Agreement SampleSettlement Agreement • July 19th, 2021 • Ohio
Choice of Law: This adultery shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the met of significant State without reference to its provisions regarding choice in law.
Settlement Agreement Non Disparagement ClauseSettlement Agreement • May 26th, 2022
Contain non-disparagement clauses that bind both the homeowner plaintiff. This information or any portion thereof may not be copied or disseminated in any form or by any means or stored in an electronic database or retrieval system without the express written consent of the American Bar Association. Business Disparagement is different than defamation in regards to the right it protects. The same would hold true if the confidentiality clause were to apply to any other form of knowledge gained by the attorney during the representation, in the absence of his execution of this Release, for which Ms. It could be anything. Employers must provide a copy of the policies to each employee at the time of hire and make the policies available to employees within the workplace. Bank or the termination of that employment. Agreeing to such a request can prove challenging because it is very difficult to guarantee that no one employed at the company will speak ill of the former employee. The declaration
Huff et al., Appellees, v. FirstEnergy Corp. et al.; Ohio Edison Company et al., Appellants.Contracts • March 1st, 2012
For an injured third party to qualify as an intended third-party beneficiary under a written contract, the contract must indicate an intention to benefit that third party.
Indiana Purchase Agreement Improved PropertyPurchase Agreement • August 30th, 2021
aBrumlloukr-ypalanteddligwnhifeonrmdoTgagilionrgstsillomesddeismmeaanntslehrsisvbeeryllopwaesrsiivnesluypapnredsfslaibtulyle. nIstlyH?eCnrhikaranlwelaRysicartydpeicxaclualpnadtes some
Kostelnik, Exr., Appellant, v. Helper et al., Appellees.Settlement Agreement • July 2nd, 2004
{¶1} On June 9, 1995, appellant, Michael R. Kostelnik, Jr., as executor of the estate of Jacqueline M. Kostelnik, filed a wrongful-death action against appellee Steven D. Helper, M.D., and appellee Meridia Hillcrest Hospital. The complaint alleged that Jacqueline M. Kostelnik’s death was proximately caused by the negligence of Dr. Helper and Meridia Hillcrest Hospital. The trial was set for September 29, 1997. However, on that day, in the presence of the trial judge, Kostelnik agreed to settle the case against Dr. Helper and Hillcrest Hospital. Accordingly, the parties filed a “Stipulation for Dismissal and Judgment Entry,” which read, “Settled and Dismissed with prejudice at Defendant’s costs. No record.” The judge and all the parties signed the entry.
Does Nuvasive Require A Non Compete AgreementNon-Compete Agreement • January 25th, 2022
onmtippaetthiteivtieclay,llyshpeapaisllcoesned, sBaitrmroanrvdealtleoluinselys. eTihkyomnsicaannddosuytnshcihnreomweosohlleCnu. rAtirsacmhasrhioatmsbolidnigrtihlyerthvailtlaPinasrk
CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASEClass Action Settlement Agreement • June 12th, 2021 • Ohio
This Class Action Settlement Agreement and Release dated June 8, 2021 (the “Agreement”), is made and entered into by and among: (i) Class Representative Plaintiffs Miles Black, Melissa Black a.k.a. Melissa Hyde, Lorraine Morris, John Perfette, Samuel Rotz, and John Beal (“Class Representatives” or “Plaintiffs”) and (ii) Defendant Blue Line Solutions, LLC (“Blue Line”) (collectively, the “Settling Parties”). The Agreement is intended to fully, finally, and forever resolve, discharge, and settle the Released Claims (as defined herein) as against Blue Line (as defined herein) only, subject to the approval of the Court and the terms and conditions set forth
