Examples of AB 117 in a sentence
The content of this Implementation Plan complies with the statutory requirements of AB 117.
Community Choice AggregationIn 2002, California passed AB 117, which permits any city, county or a combination of cities and/or counties to aggregate the electric load of the residents, businesses, and municipal facilities that are located within their city or county limits and enter into electric power contracts on their behalf; this is called Community Choice Aggregation (CCA).7 Currently, the California Public Utilities Commission has authorized one CCA, which was submitted by a Joint Powers Authority.
Pursuant to Penal Code Section 1230, the Partnership shall provide advice concerning Probation’s community corrections program as defined in subdivision (c) of Penal Code Section 1229 and shall recommend a local plan to the Orange County Board of Supervisors for the implementation of the 2011 Realignment Legislation addressing public safety as expressed in AB 109, AB 117 and AB 118 of 2011.
Two entities have formed CCAs since AB 117 was passed into law in 2002, the San Joaquin Valley Power Authority and the City of San Francisco.The PUC authorized its first CCA application under AB 117 on April 30, 2007.
Merced argues that the “shortfall charge” conforms to AB 117 by charging irrigation districtcustomers only for their “fair share” of DWR’s historical electricity purchases, but no more.Modesto claims that the Rate Agreement exempts its irrigation district customers from any DWR Bond Charges.
The utilities and the CCAs disagree about the extent to which AB 117 requires or permits the Commission to regulate consumer protections.
AB 117 requires that every customer be served by the CCA unless the customer opts-out of the CCA’s service.
Background and Discussion AB 117 enables cities and/or counties to implement a Community Choice Aggregation or CCA program.
Because AB 117, a state statute, permits the Commission to require this service to CCAs, we do not address the relevance of the US Supreme Court’s decision in PG&E Co v.
Aspreviously explained, we exercise jurisdiction to impose bond charges through IOU tariffs which is within our authority, and under the statutory authority of AB 117 and related Water Code statutes.In D.02-11-022, we imposed DWR Bond Charges on DA customers that took bundled service after February 1, 2001.