Examples of Chesapeake Entities in a sentence
Notwithstanding anything contained herein, with respect to the Shared Services Employees, the General Partner shall have no obligation or liability with respect to Termination Costs arising out of or relating to the services provided by such Shared Services Employees to the Chesapeake Entities.
The “Transfer Date” (as such term is defined in that certain Amended and Restated Employee Transfer Agreement entered into by among others, certain Chesapeake Entities and Access MLP Operating, L.L.C., as amended (the “Employee Transfer Agreement”)) shall be the “Termination Date” as such term is defined in the Transition Services Agreement for each Seconded Employee hired pursuant to Section 2.1 of the Employee Transfer Agreement.
Prior to the Closing Date, the Seller shall take or cause to be taken any and all such actions as are necessary to provide that each employee set forth on Schedule 4.14 hereto (the “Seconded Employees”) shall be added to Exhibit A as a “seconded employee” under that certain Amended and Restated Employee Secondment Agreement entered into by, among others, certain Chesapeake Entities and Access MLP Operating, L.L.C., as amended (the “Employee Secondment Agreement”), effective as of the Closing.
If state Governments were to be vested with powers to impose and collect custom duties and Companies Income Tax, it may obstruct the flow of goods between the States and create some distortion in the administration of these taxes.
Plaintiffs claim the Chesapeake Entities knew or had reason to know that the leases “were materially altered, fraudulently obtained, not supported by consideration, null and void due to the failure to reasonably develop the oil and gas, [and] invalidly and unlawfully notarized and recorded.
Friend, U.S. , 130 S.Ct. 1181 (2010) (United States Supreme Court adopts “nerve center” test to determine a corporation's principal place of business, i.e., “the place where a corporation’s officers direct, control, and coordinate the corporation's activities.” Id. at 1192.to Defendant Chesapeake Appalachia in 2010, which in turn transferred and conveyed its interests in the leases to the Chesapeake Entities on or about November 1, 2011.
Plaintiffs allege that the Chesapeake Entities were aware that the leases were invalid,2 and therefore “susceptible to being unilaterally terminated by Plaintiffs,” because Plaintiffs had “recently” been approached by the other agents, servants and workmen of those entities for “ratification,” “top leases,” or “amendments” to the leases, in an effort “to trick the Plaintiffs into reaffirming their respective Leases in order to prohibit possible termination by Plaintiffs.”Count IV: Breach of Contract.
One of the Chesapeake Entities, CHK Utica, is a Delaware limited liability company with its principal place of business in Oklahoma; the remaining Chesapeake Entities appear to be incorporated in Oklahoma, with principal places of business also in Oklahoma.
For purposes of diversity of citizenship, therefore, the Chesapeake Entities are citizens of Oklahoma but one, CHK Utica, is also a citizen of Delaware.