External reviewers definition

External reviewers. A list of qualified outside reviewers provided by the 20 bargaining unit faculty member.

Split View

AI-Powered Contracts

Draft, Review & Redline at the Speed of AI

Get StartedSchedule a Demo

External reviewers. Schedule for Review of Tenure and Promotion Files. The ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ or 21 designee will establish a schedule for the compilation and review of tenure and 22 promotion files. If the bargaining unit faculty member fails to comply with the timeline 23 established by the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ for submission of materials, the department or unit head will 24 notify the faculty member of the missed deadline by university email and the primary 25 phone on record in the Banner system. If the faculty member does not respond within 26 14 days, tenure may be denied. If the faculty member responds within 14 days, the 27 department or unit head will establish a new deadline for submission of all materials. 28 The new deadline must allow the University adequate time to complete the tenure review 30 process by June 15. If the faculty member misses the new deadline, tenure will be denied. 31 32 Section 14. External reviews. The department or unit head will prepare a list of qualified 33 external reviewers, with input from the department or unit faculty eligible to vote on a 34 tenure and promotion case. The department or unit head will select a majority of the 35 external reviewers, but the department or unit head’s primary responsibility is to obtain the 36 best judgments from the most highly qualified experts in the appropriate areas. Most, if 37 not all, of the external reviewers should be at the rank for which the candidate is being 38 considered or above (i.e., associate professor or professor for tenure and promotion to 39 associate professor; professor for promotion to professor). Reviewers generally should 40 come from comparable institutions or programs. The suggestions regarding rank and 41 affiliations of external reviewers apply to the majority of the reviewers and are not strict 42 prohibitions, so there is flexibility to meet particular circumstances. A minimum of five 43 substantive external evaluations is required for a tenure case to move forward. 44 45 The department or unit head will recruit external reviewers from this list and provide 46 them with the candidate’s signed and dated curriculum vitae, signed and dated personal 47 statement, the candidate’s scholarship portfolio and the department’s or unit’s adopted 48 criteria for promotion and tenure. 49

External reviewers. A list of qualified outside reviewers provided by the 21 Section 13. Schedule for Review of Tenure and Promotion Files. The ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ or 22 designee will establish a schedule for the compilation and review of tenure and 23 promotion files. If the bargaining unit faculty member fails to comply with the timeline 24 established by the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ for submission of materials, the department or unit head will 25 notify the faculty member of the missed deadline by university email and the primary 26 phone on record in the Banner system. If the faculty member does not respond within 27 14 days, tenure may be denied. If the faculty member responds within 14 days, the 28 department or unit head will establish a new deadline for submission of all materials. 30 The new deadline must allow the University adequate time to complete the tenure review 31 process by June 15. If the faculty member misses the new deadline, tenure will be denied.

Examples of External reviewers in a sentence

• External reviewers should be selected to avoid conflict of interest and unnecessary cost.

• External reviewers shall be asked to address their knowledge and relationship with the candidate.

• External reviewers should not have prior close affiliations with the candidate, such as having been collaborators or co-authors on projects or in a direct advisory role.

• External reviewers will receive a copy of the host university and nonfederal partners’ self-assessment to assist in preparing the external review.

• External reviewers must be asked to base their evaluation and judgment on the criteria in use by the academic department or program.

• External reviewers shall establish and maintain a permanent, independent and effective compliance function for the activities performed under this Regulation.

• External reviewers shall ensure that third party service providers cooperate and comply with any supervisory requests from ESMA in connection with any outsourced assessment activities.

• External reviewers shall not outsource all of their assessment activities nor their compliance function.

• External reviewers should be sent the candidate’s curriculum vitae and copies of those scholarly and/or creative works along with any other materials or information that the candidate and his/her department chair have agreed to send.

• External reviewers that outsource their assessment activities to third-party service providers shall ensure that any such third-party service provider has the ability and the capacity to perform those assessment activities reliably and professionally.