Final Effectiveness Rating definition

Final Effectiveness Rating derives from two different cumulative sets of data. The professional practice rating based on the quality standards (I-IV) will make up fifty percent of the rating with the quality standard (VI) measure of student learning, making up the other fifty percent of a teacher’s final effectiveness rating. A teacher whose final rating is “ineffective” or “partially ineffective” is deemed ineffectively performing. A teacher whose final rating is “effective” and “highly effective” is deemed effectively performing.
View Source
Final Effectiveness Rating derives from two different cumulative sets of data. The professional practice rating based on the quality standards (I-IV) will make up fifty percent of the rating with the quality standard (V) measure of student learning, making up the other fifty percent of an SSP Employee’s final effectiveness rating. AN SSP Employee whose final rating is “ineffective” or “partially ineffective” is deemed ineffectively performing. AN SSP Employee whose final rating is “effective” and “highly effective” is deemed effectively performing.
View Source

Examples of Final Effectiveness Rating in a sentence

  • Level 2: If disagreements with the Final Effectiveness Rating are not resolved at Level 1, then the teacher may submit any evaluation substance concerns in writing to the Chief Human Resources Officer within seven calendar days.

  • This process may be used only by those teachers whose evaluations indicate overall ineffective or partially effective Final Effectiveness Rating.

  • The appeal process shall be the final determination in regard to the Final Effectiveness Rating and the loss of non-probationary status after a second consecutive Final Effectiveness Rating of ineffective or partially effective.

  • Upon receipt of the Final Effectiveness Rating of partially effective/ineffective the teacher will have fifteen (15) calendar days to file the appeal of their rating, and the process is to be completed in forty-five (45) calendar days.

  • The process for the appeal of a second consecutive Overall Professional Practice or Final Effectiveness Rating of partially effective or ineffective shall conclude no more than forty-five (45) calendar days after the final evaluation conference and receipt of the final Evaluation documents.

  • The teacher is permitted only one appeal per year, per Final Effectiveness Rating of ineffective or partially effective.

  • Level 1: The teacher discusses any differences he/she has with the evaluator with association representation, if requested, regarding the substance of his/her evaluation within fifteen calendar days of receiving the Final Effectiveness Rating.

  • The appeal process shall be the final determination in regard to the Final Effectiveness Rating and loss or retention of non-probationary status.

  • The process for the appeal of a second consecutive Overall Professional Practice or Final Effectiveness Rating of partially effective or ineffective shall conclude nomore than forty-five (45) calendar days after the final evaluation conference and receipt of the final Evaluation documents.

  • An appeal may be filed if there is a discrepancy between very high Student Learning score and a very low Professional Practice and Professional Foundation score that results in a rating of Developing (D*) on the Final Effectiveness Rating Matrix (RI Model Teacher Evaluation & Support System Edition II p.