Examples of International Federations in a sentence
This includes, for example, the International Olympic Committee, the International Paralympic Committee, other Major Event Organizations that conduct Testing at their Events, WADA, International Federations, and National Anti-Doping Organizations.
This includes, for example, the International Olympic Committee, the International Paralympic Committee, other Major Event Organizations that conduct Testing at their Events, International Federations, and National Anti-Doping Organizations.
For International Federations, Athletes (especially from its priority disciplines or nations) who compete regularly at the highest level of international Competition (e.g., candidates for Olympic, Paralympic or World Championship medals), as determined by rankings or other suitable criteria.
This includes, for example, the International Olympic Committee, the International Paralympic Committee, other Major Event Organisations that conduct Testing at their Events, WADA, International Federations, and National Anti-Doping Organisations.
Notice of Anti-Doping Rule Violations to National Anti-Doping Organisations, International Federations and WADA DFSNZ shall also notify the Athlete’s National Anti-Doping Organisation, International Federation and WADA of the assertion of an anti-doping rule violation simultaneously with the notice to the Athlete or other Person.
Article 4.4.6 provides that WADA, in certain cases, must review TUE decisions of International Federations, and that it may review any other TUE decisions, in each case to determine compliance with the Article 4.1 conditions.
Multiple events in a particular sport must be standardised events and in accordance with the events organised by the approved International Federations.
It also allows International Federations to focus their anti-doping programs (including Testing) on those who compete regularly at the international level (i.e., International-Level Athletes, as defined by the International Federation).
In particular, given that International Federations and National Anti-Doping Organizations have equally important roles in fighting doping in sport, they should be treated the same (mutatis mutandis) when it comes to imposing Signatory Consequences for non-compliance with their respective obligations under the Code and the International Standards.
The lack of harmonisation of sanctions has also frequently been the source of jurisdictional conflicts between International Federations and National Anti-Doping Organisations.