Objectivity definition

Objectivity but as a means to fully explore assumptions they make going into their study. This is another tool for reflexivity as the study progresses.

Split View

AI-Powered Contracts

Draft, Review & Redline at the Speed of AI

Get StartedSchedule a Demo

Objectivity means the impartial attitude and mentality, which allows the members of the Board of Directors to perform their work as they believe and not to accept compromises in terms of their quality.

Objectivity which means that members should be impartial and not allow prejudice or bias, conflict of interest or the influence of others to override their objective judgement.

Examples of Objectivity in a sentence

• Compliance with the NIH requirement to maintain a written standard of conduct and comply with 42 CFR Part 50, Subpart F, Responsibility of Applicants for Promoting Objectivity in Research.

• This agreement is subject to the “Guidelines for Ensuring and Maximizing the Quality, Objectivity, Utility, and Integrity of Information Disseminated by Federal Agencies; Republication” and the “USDA Guidelines for Quality of Information” which can be found at ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇.▇▇▇.▇▇/qoi/.

• The Subrecipient, or Contractor, hereby certifies that it has an active and enforced conflict-of-interest policy that is consistent with the regulatory provisions of 42 CFR, Part 50, Subpart F Responsibility of Applicants for Promoting Objectivity in Research.

• Objectivity - In carrying out public business, including making public appointments, awarding contracts, or recommending individuals for rewards and benefits, holders of public office should make choices on merit.

• Objectivity: Attribution must not benefit the access provider, any access seeker, service or business.

More Definitions of Objectivity

Objectivity means that information is substantively accurate, clear, complete, and presented in an unbiased manner;

Objectivity under the NIST IQS means that the information is “accurate, reliable, and unbiased.” (See id.) Moreover, “objective” information is “presented in an accurate, clear, complete, and unbiased manner.” In the case of scientific information, “the original and supporting data are generated, and the analytic results are developed, using sound statistical and research methods.” (See id.)

Objectivity means that physical powers do not depend on how we cognize them. Powers are mind-independent. For George Molnar, powers

Objectivity under the Guidelines means that information disseminated by FWS will be presented “accurately, clearly and completely,” and treated in an unbiased fashion. Part III-8. “To achieve this end, FWS will subject information to review by persons qualified to judge objectivity.” Part VI-9. “In a scientific, financial or statistical context, we will analyze the original and supporting data and develop our results using sound statistical and research methods to ensure, to the best of our knowledge that our results are not subject to bias.” Part III-8. “The limitations[,] [assumptions, and biases] of the information disseminated by FWS will be explicitly stated.” Parts III-8, VI-9. “If data and analytical results have been subjected to formal, independent, peer review, we will generally presume that the information is of acceptable objectivity.” Part VI-9. However, a request for correction or FWS may rebut this presumption based on a persuasive showing in a particular instance.

Objectivity means acting without bias or prejudice. Detachment and impartiality are important aspects of objectivity.

Objectivity just means ‘object’. So the definition could have read: ‘A pred- ication is a linguistic and logical object expressing the enrichment that the sense of an object undergoes in cognitive consciousness ’. However, apart from being less elegant than (10), this formulation is confusing, because, as we shall see, the two occurrences of ‘object’ have a very different signifi- cance. I have thus preferred ‘objectivity’, which in Husserl’s usage denotes a particular type of object – the type, in fact, to which predications belong: ideal objects, i.e., recall from Section 2.1, objects that do not exist in time. So the claim that predications are linguistic and logical objectivities is, in effect, identical with the claim that predications are linguistic and logical ideal objects. Which I will now try to clarify.

Objectivity means that conflicts of interest do not exist, or are resolved so as not to adversely influence subsequent activities of SADCAS.