Proposition 2 definition

Proposition 2. For some initial capital endowments, North is better off (and the South is worse off) under bargaining over trade and aid than under free-trade.

Split View

AI-Powered Contracts

Draft, Review & Redline at the Speed of AI

Get StartedSchedule a Demo

Proposition 2. Assuming that P 1, a lower bound on the secret-key agreement capacity is capacity is given by, 2 √

Proposition 2. For European put options, its ∆ hedge is given by ∆ = N (−d1).

Examples of Proposition 2 in a sentence

• All other members update their trees accordingly and compute the new group key (see Proposition 2).

• On November 6, 2012, Kirkland voters approved Proposition 2: City Parks Maintenance, Restoration and Enhancement Levy.

• Figure 1 shows the probability distributions of the four segments at all possible locations calculated with the analytical formula in Proposition 2.

• It need to be kept in mind, however, that a loss for a government does not necessarily imply a welfare loss of the country, since government objectives are distorted by lobbying groups.24 Proposition 2 can explain the protest storm of some LDCs against the negotiation of MAI by the club of the OECD countries, although they were both free to opt in or out.

• Proposition 2 Governments of all countries that do not join MAI lose compared to a world without MAI; governments of all countries with χi > χ gain.

• However, the net surplus with P4D deals with J challengers becomes negative making it impossible to pay off all the firms, i.e. condition in Proposition (2) is violated for large J.

• Then the constraint (20) is not binding for c∈C any country unless it is binding for country χs, since χs is the country that is first hit by a welfare loss according to Proposition 2 when the agreement gets too strict.

• By Proposition 2, we have for the upper bound that n2 n2 fc(n— c— 1) ≤ (c + 1)(n— c— 1))log2(n— c— 1) ≤ 4 )log2(n) = (1 + o(1)) 4 log2(n).

• We also present Proposition 2, our result on the maximal treaty depth for low discount factors and a large number of countries.

• Together with our other parameter restrictions, which ensure that the left-hand-side of each inequality is strictly positive, it follows that c1 < c2 for the small uncertainty case, as Proposition 2 indicates.

More Definitions of Proposition 2

Proposition 2. If society aims to punish the guilty, deter harmful acts but not chill benign ones, and avoid erroneous verdicts, then discretion is optimal if and only if (6’) ≥ (5’). If the model is applied to a civil dispute between two private parties, the costs of a “wrongful conviction” and “false acquittal” need reinterpretation. A transfer of wealth from one party to the other is not necessarily a welfare cost at all.

Proposition 2. Shall Section 4 of Article I of the Charter be amended to provide that when the City approves a subdivision plat, the plat shall show all public improvements that are being dedicated to the City and the City’s acceptance of the public improvements will not occur until the City does so by actual appropriation, entry, use, or improvement of the dedicated property? □ For □ Against

Proposition 2. The poverty measure I k 1. k −1 (i) gives the value of the index I when only (k-1) variables have been dropped and k is the rank of the variable i; / 1 2. I 1 (i) / 0 3. I 1 (i) gives the value of the index I when this variable is the first one to be dropped; gives the value of the index I when the variable i has the first rank and no variable have been dropped (all the variable are included in the computation of I); / 2 4. I 2 (i) corresponds to the (n-1)! cases where the variable i is the second one to be dropped and two variables as a whole have been dropped; / 1 5. I 2 (i) gives the value of the index I when only one variable has been dropped and the variable i has the second rank; 6. n−1 (i) corresponds to the (n-1)! cases where the variable i is dropped last and is the only one to be take into account; / n 7. I n (i) gives the value of the index I when variable i has rank n and n variable have been dropped (it is 0 by definition). Deutch and ▇▇▇▇▇▇ define the contribution C j (i) dropped when it has rank j, in the following way: of variable i to the index I, assuming this variable I is 1 ( n−1)![ j j ] C j (i) = ∑ I /( j −1) (i) − I / j where h refers to one of the (n-1)! cases where the variable i has rank j. The overall contribution of variable i to the index I may then be defined as: C(i) = ∑Ck (i) k =1

Proposition 2. With banks’ efforts, the incentive coefficient increases. The difference of incentive coefficient in two cases is as follows: