Renewed Litigation definition

Renewed Litigation means the renewed litigation that may be commenced by any of the Parties pursuant to Section 6 of the Settlement Agreement.
View Source
Renewed Litigation means the litigation that may be commenced by any of the Parties pursuant to Section 6 of this Settlement Agreement.
View Source

Examples of Renewed Litigation in a sentence

  • The Parties acknowledge and agree that their interests in the Pending Litigation and any Renewed Litigation are adverse.

  • Further, the Parties agree that if any Renewed Litigation occurs, they will not assert that this Joint Defense Agreement or the exchange or disclosure of any information under this Joint Defense Agreement waived any applicable rights or privileges or protection from disclosure or the attorney-client privilege between or among the Parties and Defense Counsel.

  • Rugby and/or Rugby IPD shall have the right to assert whatever defenses or counterclaims that they deem appropriate in response to Huttig’s filing of the Renewed Litigation.

  • Other than disputes or circumstances that give rise to the filing of any Renewed Litigation and disputes arising out of or relating to the Joint Defense Agreement, any dispute arising out of or relating to this Settlement Agreement shall be resolved by binding and final arbitration before a single arbitrator under the International Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association.

  • Rugby shall file the Renewed Litigation in a federal court of the State of New York.

  • If the Renewed Litigation names only Rugby as a defendant, Huttig shall file such lawsuit in a federal court of the State of New York.

  • Neither Rugby nor Rugby IPD is consenting that the Court is an appropriate forum for the resolution of such lawsuit in light of their position concerning the proper interpretation of Section 10.5 of the Share Exchange Agreement, and Rugby and Rugby IPD are free to assert in any Renewed Litigation filed in the Court that a federal court of the State of New York is the only appropriate forum concerning the interpretation and enforcement of the provisions of the Share Exchange Agreement.

  • Huttig shall have the right to assert whatever defenses or counterclaims that it deems appropriate in response to Rugby’s filing of the Renewed Litigation.

  • In the event that the federal court finds that Rugby IPD is an indispensable party or otherwise dismisses the lawsuit for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, Rugby and/or Rugby IPD may then, at their option, file the Renewed Litigation in the Court.

  • If the Renewed Litigation names both Rugby and Rugby IPD and complete diversity does not exist between Huttig, on the one hand, and Rugby and Rugby IPD, on the other hand, the Renewed Lawsuit shall be filed in the Court.