Scoring Criteria definition

Scoring Criteria means the criteria detailed in Appendix II by which points are assigned for the purpose of Competitive Scoring.

Scoring Criteria. The Yuba Water Board of Directors establishes grant funding limits on an annual basis. To fairly evaluate and score each grant application, agency staff use the nine (9) criteria listed below. Prior to completing each of the nine criteria questions, we encourage applicants to review the scoring criteria outline. Link to detailed scoring criteria. *Indicates a required field. Criteria 1: Yuba Water Strategic Plan (Measurable Progress toward Agency Strategic Priorities and Objectives)

Scoring Criteria. Badcock collects data about consumers and their willingness to pay their debts using scoring criteria. The scoring criteria, models and methodologies are developed in house or purchased from third parties. Such scoring criteria must not directly or indirectly result in discriminatory credit granting, debt collection or credit reporting practices. The Senior Vice President of Credit Service and Accounts Receivable Management shall develop input criteria that does not consider or use criteria or attributes based on race, color, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, age (provided the applicant has the capacity to contract), receipt of public assistance income or exercise in good faith of any right under the Consumer Credit Protection Act, including but not limited to, zip code demographics, birth date, litigation or complaint history, fluency in the English language, etc. The Compliance Department in collaboration with the Credit Services and Accounts Receivable Management Department shall: ● Periodically but not less than annually, test all scoring methods to ensure compliance with the input criteria; ● Periodically but not less than annually, test the impact of Badcock’s use of all scoring methods to detect and correct the existence of intentional or unintentional disparate impact on members of protected classes resulting from credit granting, workflow processes, settlement offers, interest, charges, fees, collection litigation; credit reporting and other discretionary processes and decision points in the credit granting and collection process; ● Conduct Board of Directors, Management and employee and dealer training on the requirements of the ECOA, this policy, the complaint escalation process and Badcock’s whistle blower policy; ● Include questions in the call audit/monitoring process to detect noncompliance with this policy and the law; ● Review call audit/monitoring results periodically regarding ECOA noncompliance, report findings to the Operational Compliance Committee and /or the Compliance Oversight Committee and recommend corrective action; and ● Ensure all third party service providers adhere to Badcock’s ECOA policy through training, testing and relevant contract provisions. Discretionary Practices Generally – In order to xxxxxx excellent communication with consumers in connection with the granting of credit or collection of debt, certain employees and dealers have the authority to make exceptions to Badcock’s credit granting, collectio...

Examples of Scoring Criteria in a sentence

• Stage Two: Application Scoring Applications that pass Stage One will be submitted to the Evaluation Committee for review and scoring based on the Scoring Criteria in Section F of this Part.

• CD evaluated the application with respect to the scoring criteria defined in D.12-02-015, Appendix 1, Section VIII (Scoring Criteria).

• It is also strongly advised that applicants provide information that clearly and specifically addresses the Scoring Criteria listed later in these guidelines.

• Although these projects need not compete for an award through the competitive process, they must still be evaluated against the Threshold Criteria and the Competitive Scoring Criteria (both as outlined and defined in the Guide), and they must comply with the provisions of this Allocation Plan.

• In accordance with Section 2.5 of the Guide, CDA will release information on all Maryland LIHTC awards in a round along with information on waivers granted and any State Bonus Points awarded within the Competitive Scoring Criteria pursuant to Chapter 4 of the Guide.

• Scoring Criteria AHSC Program funds will be allocated through a competitive process, based on the merits of the application to support sustainable development that expands and improves transit, walking and bicycling infrastructure and provides opportunities to reduce VMT by supporting connectivity between housing and destinations to bring about reduction of GHG emissions.

• Scoring Criteria for Part A Evaluation Process is distributed as outlined in the RFP Summary Page, as amended by applicable addenda.

• Such projects are not required to compete with others but will be scored using the Competitive Scoring Criteria and must achieve a minimum total score of ninety-two (92) points to be awarded MBP and RHW funds and non-competitive LIHTC.

• Recommendations for reservations of competitive RHFP funds and/or LIHTC will be made by the internal committee based on the evaluation of projects pursuant to the Competitive Scoring Criteria, the award of State Bonus Points under Section 4.7, and the availability of resources.

• A Proposal submitted in response to this RFP will be scored and ranked based on the Scoring Criteria.

More Definitions of Scoring Criteria

Scoring Criteria means the criteria detailed in Appendix II by which points are assigned for thepurpose of Competitive Scoring.

Scoring Criteria means the Scoring Criteria described in Section V below and the PILOT Evaluation Matrix.

Scoring Criteria. Applicant has written evidence that the proposed project will create and/or support existing jobs. The number of jobs must be evidenced by a written commitment from the business to be assisted.

Scoring Criteria. Applicant has evidence of successful experience in type of activity.