Examples of Trott & Trott in a sentence
On July 6, 2011, Defendant Trott & Trott timely removed Plaintiffs’ lawsuit from the Washtenaw County Circuit Court because Plaintiffs had alleged a federal claim against that Defendant [1].
Besides, there is a great need for sharing best practices and lesions learnt on well implemented policies and programs, developing adequate teaching methodologies, quality assurance and evaluation methods, sharing and development of literature, etc.
Our simple and transparent transactional experience is supported by a dynamic pricing model that is flexed by time, supplier demand and credit worthiness.To enable us to offer early payment to suppliers around the world, we are establishing financing structures in new geographies through Tungsten Bank and other financing vehicles or partnerships.
Tawfik contacted Trott & Trott, and according to the Complaint, he was told to continue to work directly with BAC.
In November 2010, Trott & Trott published a notice of foreclosure sale on the trust’s behalf.
Even assuming that a Trott & Trott employee told Tawfik that he did not need a mediation because he was working with BAC directly, Plaintiff fails to show aviolation of the statute.
Voydanoff here summarily posits that “Select [Portfolio] was an agent for purposes of possessing the notes,” and that “examining the transactions between Select [Portfolio], Trott & Trott [Select Portfolio’s counsel] and MERS as a whole, it is clear that the transactions established the agency relationship with its accompanying fiduciary duties.” Voydanoff’s conclusory allegations do not suffice to establish that, in the context of this lender-borrower relationship, he “repos[ed] .
Inform Linnell & Associates immediately when any notice is received from Orlans Associates, Trott & Trott, Schneiderman & Sherman, P.C., or other lender representative.
PNC’s attorneys, Trott & Trott (Trott), by letter dated March 24, 2011, informed Khadher that PNC had elected to accelerate the total indebtedness.
Kukuk also failed to show that there were genuine issues of material fact as to whether Trott & Trott is a “debt collector.” Under 15 USC 1692a(6), Kukuk had to prove that Trott & Trott (1) has as its principal business purpose the collection of debts, (2) regularly collects or attempts to collect debts, or (3) has as its principal business purpose the enforcement of securityinterests.