Common use of Novērtēšanas process Clause in Contracts

Novērtēšanas process. 6.1. Pirms novērtēšanas vizītes augstākās izglītības iestādē (turpmāk - vizīte) un vizītes laikā ekspertu grupas uzdevumi: 6.1.1. iepazīties ar dokumentiem, kas reglamentē studiju virziena akreditāciju, un pirms vizītes piedalīties AIC organizētās mācībās; 6.1.2. iepazīties ar augstākās izglītības iestādes pašnovērtējuma ziņojumu un citu ar vērtējamo studiju virzienu saistīto informāciju; 6.1.3. sagatavot savu viedokli par dažādiem aspektiem, iekļaujot arī tēmas/jautājumus, kuriem nepieciešams pievērst īpašu uzmanību novērtēšanas vizītes laikā, un elektroniski to nosūtīt ekspertu grupas vadītājam un novērtēšanas koordinatoram ne vēlāk kā vienu nedēļu pirms vizītes sākuma; 6.1.4. veikt citus uzdevumus, kas saistīti ar novērtēšanas procesu, saskaņā ar darbu dalījumu starp ekspertu grupas dalībniekiem. 6.2. Ekspertu grupas vadītājs ir atbildīgs par ekspertu grupas darbu kopumā un veic šādus pienākumus: 6.2.1. pēc iepazīšanās ar dokumentiem organizē ekspertu grupas dalībnieku komunikāciju (videokonferences, telefonkonferences, e-pasta u.c. veidā); higher education about composition of the group of experts. 5.3. The institution of higher education may request rejection of the members of the group of experts, by submitting within three business days a reasoned application in written to the Study Accreditation Committee, explaining in it the causes of rejection with regard to each rejected expert. 5.4. Within two weeks the Study Accreditation Committee reviews the application by the institution of higher education, if the Study Accreditation Committee recognises this application as valid, the AIC shall nominate other candidates as experts for replacing the rejected ones, establishing a new group of experts, and inform the institution of higher education about new composition of the expert group. 6. The evaluation process 6.1. Prior to the on-site visit and during the on-site visit the expert group duties are: 6.1.1. to review the documents that regulate the accreditation of the study direction, and shall participate in training organised by the AIC before the on-site visit; 6.1.2. to review the self-assessment report of the institution of higher education and other relevant information; 6.1.3. to prepare the opinion on various aspects, including also topics/issues that should be paid special attention to during the on-site visit, and shall forward it electronically to the head of the group of experts and the assessment coordinator not later than one week before the start of the on-site visit; 6.1.4. to perform other tasks related to the assessment process, in accordance with the tasks allocated among the members of the group of experts 6.2. The head of the expert group is responsible for the group of experts on the whole and has following duties: 6.2.1. prior to the on-site visit, he or she shall organise (videoconference, phone conference, e-mail etc.) communication of the group members, after they have reviewed the documents; 6.2.2. prior to the on-site visit by the group of experts, shall discuss the schedule of work of the group of experts with the AIC;

Novērtēšanas process. 6.1. Pirms novērtēšanas vizītes augstākās izglītības iestādē (turpmāk - vizīte) un vizītes laikā ekspertu grupas uzdevumi: 6.1.1. iepazīties ar dokumentiem, kas reglamentē studiju virziena akreditāciju, un pirms vizītes piedalīties AIC organizētās mācībās; 6.1.2. iepazīties ar augstākās izglītības iestādes pašnovērtējuma ziņojumu un citu ar vērtējamo studiju virzienu saistīto informāciju; 6.1.3. sagatavot savu viedokli par dažādiem aspektiem, iekļaujot arī tēmas/jautājumus, kuriem nepieciešams pievērst īpašu uzmanību novērtēšanas vizītes laikā, un elektroniski to nosūtīt ekspertu grupas vadītājam un novērtēšanas koordinatoram ne vēlāk kā vienu nedēļu pirms vizītes sākuma; 6.1.4. veikt citus uzdevumus, kas saistīti ar novērtēšanas procesu, saskaņā ar darbu dalījumu starp ekspertu grupas dalībniekiem. 6.2. Ekspertu grupas vadītājs ir atbildīgs par ekspertu grupas darbu kopumā un veic šādus pienākumus: 6.2.15.2. pēc iepazīšanās ar dokumentiem organizē ekspertu grupas dalībnieku komunikāciju (videokonferences, telefonkonferences, e-pasta u.c. veidā); Study Accreditation Committee approves the group of experts and AIC within three working days informs the institution of higher education about composition of the group of experts. 5.3. The institution of higher education may request rejection of the members of the group of experts, by submitting within three business days a reasoned application in written to the Study Accreditation Committee, explaining in it the causes of rejection with regard to each rejected expert. 5.4. Within two weeks the Study Accreditation Committee reviews the application by the institution of higher education, if the Study Accreditation Committee recognises this application as valid, the AIC shall nominate other candidates as experts for replacing the rejected ones, establishing a new group of experts, and inform the institution of higher education about new composition of the expert group. 6. The evaluation process 6.1. Prior to the on-site visit and during the on-site visit the expert group duties are: 6.1.1. to review the documents that regulate the accreditation of the study direction, and shall participate in training organised by the AIC before the on-site visit; 6.1.2. to review the self-assessment report of the institution of higher education and other relevant information; 6.1.3. to prepare the opinion on various aspects, including also topics/issues that should be paid special attention to during the on-site visit, and shall forward it electronically to the head of the group of experts and the assessment coordinator not later than one week before the start of the on-site visit; 6.1.4. to perform other tasks related to the assessment process, in accordance with the tasks allocated among the members of the group of experts 6.2. The head of the expert group is responsible for the group of experts on the whole and has following duties: 6.2.1. prior to the on-site visit, he or she shall organise (videoconference, phone conference, e-mail etc.) communication of the group members, after they have reviewed the documents; 6.2.2. prior to the on-site visit by the group of experts, shall discuss the schedule of work of the group of experts with the AIC;of

Novērtēšanas process. 6.1. Pirms novērtēšanas vizītes augstākās izglītības iestādē (turpmāk - vizīte) un vizītes laikā ekspertu grupas uzdevumi: 6.1.1. iepazīties ar dokumentiem, kas reglamentē studiju virziena akreditāciju, un pirms vizītes piedalīties AIC organizētās mācībās; 6.1.2. iepazīties ar augstākās izglītības iestādes pašnovērtējuma ziņojumu un citu ar vērtējamo studiju virzienu saistīto informāciju; 6.1.3. sagatavot savu viedokli par dažādiem aspektiem, iekļaujot arī tēmas/jautājumus, kuriem nepieciešams pievērst īpašu uzmanību novērtēšanas vizītes laikā, un elektroniski to nosūtīt ekspertu grupas vadītājam un novērtēšanas koordinatoram ne vēlāk kā vienu nedēļu pirms vizītes sākuma; 6.1.4. veikt citus uzdevumus, kas saistīti ar novērtēšanas procesu, saskaņā ar darbu dalījumu starp ekspertu grupas dalībniekiem. 6.2. Ekspertu grupas vadītājs ir atbildīgs par ekspertu grupas darbu kopumā un veic šādus pienākumus: 6.2.1. pēc iepazīšanās ar dokumentiem organizē ekspertu grupas dalībnieku komunikāciju (videokonferences, telefonkonferences, e-pasta u.c5.2. veidā); Study Accreditation Committee approves the group of experts and AIC within three working days informs the institution of higher education about composition of the group of experts. 5.3. The institution of higher education may request rejection of the members of the group of experts, by submitting within three business days a reasoned application in written to the Study Accreditation Committee, explaining in it the causes of rejection with regard to each rejected expert. 5.4. Within two weeks the Study Accreditation Committee reviews the application by the institution of higher education, if the Study Accreditation Committee recognises recognizes this application as valid, the AIC shall nominate other candidates as experts for replacing the rejected ones, establishing a new group of experts, and inform the institution of higher education about new composition of the expert group. 6. The evaluation process 6.1. Prior to the on-site visit and during the on-site visit the expert group duties are: 6.1.1. to review the documents that regulate the accreditation of the study direction, and shall participate in training organised organized by the AIC before the on-site visit; 6.1.2. to review the self-assessment report of the institution of higher education and other relevant information; 6.1.3. to prepare the opinion on various aspects, including also topics/issues that should be paid special attention to during the on-site visit, and shall forward it electronically to the head of the group of experts and the assessment coordinator not later than one week before the start of the on-on- site visit; 6.1.4. to perform other tasks related to the assessment process, in accordance with the tasks allocated among the members of the group of experts 6.2. The head of the expert group is responsible for the group of experts on the whole and has following duties: 6.2.1. prior to the on-site visit, he or she shall organise (videoconference, phone conferencetelefonkonferences, e-mail etc.) communication of the group members, after they have reviewed the documents; 6.2.2pasta u.c. prior to the on-site visit by the group of experts, shall discuss the schedule of work of the group of experts with the AICveidā);

Novērtēšanas process. 6.1. Pirms novērtēšanas vizītes augstākās izglītības iestādē (turpmāk - vizīte) un vizītes laikā ekspertu grupas uzdevumi: 6.1.1. iepazīties ar dokumentiem, kas reglamentē studiju virziena akreditāciju, un pirms vizītes piedalīties AIC organizētās mācībās; 6.1.2. iepazīties ar augstākās izglītības iestādes pašnovērtējuma ziņojumu un citu ar vērtējamo studiju virzienu saistīto informāciju; 6.1.3. sagatavot savu viedokli par dažādiem aspektiem, iekļaujot arī tēmas/jautājumus, kuriem nepieciešams pievērst īpašu uzmanību novērtēšanas vizītes laikā, un elektroniski to nosūtīt ekspertu grupas vadītājam un novērtēšanas koordinatoram ne vēlāk kā vienu nedēļu pirms vizītes sākuma; 6.1.4. veikt citus uzdevumus, kas saistīti ar novērtēšanas procesu, saskaņā ar darbu dalījumu starp ekspertu grupas dalībniekiem. 6.2. Ekspertu grupas vadītājs ir atbildīgs par ekspertu grupas darbu kopumā un veic šādus pienākumus: 6.2.1. pēc iepazīšanās ar dokumentiem organizē ekspertu grupas dalībnieku komunikāciju (videokonferences, telefonkonferences, e-pasta u.c. veidā); higher education about composition of the group of experts. 5.3. The institution of higher education may request rejection of the members of the group of experts, by submitting within three business days a reasoned application in written to the Study Accreditation Committee, explaining in it the causes of rejection with regard to each rejected expert. 5.4. Within two weeks the Study Accreditation Committee reviews the application by the institution of higher education, if the Study Accreditation Committee recognises recognizes this application as valid, the AIC shall nominate other candidates as experts for replacing the rejected ones, establishing a new group of experts, and inform the institution of higher education about new composition of the expert group. 6. The evaluation process 6.1. Prior to the on-site visit and during the on-site visit the expert group duties are: 6.1.1. to review the documents that regulate the accreditation of the study direction, and shall participate in training organised organized by the AIC before the on-site visit; 6.1.2. to review the self-assessment report of the institution of higher education and other relevant information; 6.1.3. to prepare the opinion on various aspects, including also topics/issues that should be paid special attention to during the on-site visit, and shall forward it electronically to the head of the group of experts and the assessment coordinator not later than one week before the start of the on-on- site visit; 6.1.4. to perform other tasks related to the assessment process, in accordance with the tasks allocated among the members of the group of experts 6.2. The head of the expert group is responsible for the group of experts on the whole and has following duties: 6.2.1. prior to the on-site visit, he or she shall organise organize (videoconference, phone conference, e-mail etc.) communication of the group members, after they have reviewed the documents; 6.2.2. prior to the on-site visit by the group of experts, shall discuss the schedule of work of the group of experts with the AIC;group

Novērtēšanas process. 6.1. Pirms novērtēšanas vizītes augstākās izglītības iestādē (turpmāk - vizīte) un vizītes laikā ekspertu grupas uzdevumi: 6.1.1. iepazīties ar dokumentiem, kas reglamentē studiju virziena akreditāciju, un pirms vizītes piedalīties AIC organizētās mācībās; 6.1.2. iepazīties ar augstākās izglītības iestādes pašnovērtējuma ziņojumu un citu ar vērtējamo studiju virzienu saistīto informāciju; 6.1.3. sagatavot savu viedokli par dažādiem aspektiem, iekļaujot arī tēmas/jautājumus, kuriem nepieciešams pievērst īpašu uzmanību novērtēšanas vizītes laikā, un elektroniski to nosūtīt ekspertu grupas vadītājam un novērtēšanas koordinatoram ne vēlāk kā vienu nedēļu pirms vizītes sākuma; 6.1.45.2. veikt citus uzdevumus, kas saistīti ar novērtēšanas procesu, saskaņā ar darbu dalījumu starp ekspertu grupas dalībniekiem. 6.2. Ekspertu grupas vadītājs ir atbildīgs par ekspertu grupas darbu kopumā un veic šādus pienākumus: 6.2.1. pēc iepazīšanās ar dokumentiem organizē ekspertu grupas dalībnieku komunikāciju (videokonferences, telefonkonferences, e-pasta u.c. veidā); Study Accreditation Committee approves the group of experts and AIC within three working days informs the institution of higher education about composition of the group of experts. 5.3. The institution of higher education may request rejection of the members of the group of experts, by submitting within three business days a reasoned application in written to the Study Accreditation Committee, explaining in it the causes of rejection with regard to each rejected expert. 5.4. Within two weeks the Study Accreditation Committee reviews the application by the institution of higher education, if the Study Accreditation Committee recognises recognizes this application as valid, the AIC shall nominate other candidates as experts for replacing the rejected ones, establishing a new group of experts, and inform the institution of higher education about new composition of the expert group. 6. The evaluation process 6.1. Prior to the on-site visit and during the on-site visit the expert group duties are: 6.1.1. to review the documents that regulate the accreditation of the study direction, and shall participate in training organised organized by the AIC before the on-site visit; 6.1.2. to review the self-assessment report of the institution of higher education and other relevant information; 6.1.3. to prepare the opinion on various aspects, including also topics/issues that should be paid special attention to during the on-site visit, and shall forward it electronically to the head of the group of experts and the assessment coordinator not later than one week before the start of the on-site visit; 6.1.4. to perform other tasks related to the assessment process, in accordance with the tasks allocated among the members of the group of experts 6.2. The head of the expert group is responsible for the group of experts on the whole and has following duties: 6.2.1. prior to the on-site visit, he or she shall organise (videoconference, phone conference, e-mail etc.) communication of the group members, after they have reviewed the documents; 6.2.2. prior to the on-site visit by the group of experts, shall discuss the schedule of work of the group of experts with the AICkoordinatoram ne vēlāk kā vienu nedēļu pirms vizītes sākuma;