Contract

61 (1956) Nr. 7‌‌‌‌‌

TRAC T A TENBLAD

VAN HET

K O N I N K R I J K D E R N E D E R L A N D E N

JAARGANG 2014 Nr. 88

A. TITEL

Verdrag inzake het verhaal in het buitenland van uitkeringen tot onderhoud;

New York, 20 juni 1956

B. TEKST

De Engelse en de Franse tekst van het Verdrag zijn geplaatst in

Trb. 1957, 121.

C. VERTALING

Zie Trb. 1957, 121.

D. PARLEMENT

Zie Trb. 1962, 106.

E. PARTIJGEGEVENS

Zie de rubrieken E en F van Trb. 1957, 121.

Partij	Onder- tekening	Ratificatie	Type*	In werking	Opzeg- ging	Buiten werking
Algerije		10-09-69	T	10-10-69
Argentinië		29-11-72	T	29-12-72
Australië		12-02-85	T	14-03-85
Xxxxxxxx		00-00-00	X	00-00-00
Xxxxxxx		14-11-96	T	14-12-96
België		01-07-66	T	31-07-66

Partij	Onder- tekening	Ratificatie	Type*	In werking	Opzeg- ging	Buiten werking
Bolivia	20-06-56
Bosnië en Xxxxxxxxxxx		00-00-00	XX	00-00-00
Xxxxxxxx	31-12-56	14-11-60	R	14-12-60
Burkina Faso		27-08-62	T	26-09-62
Cambodja	20-06-56
Centraal- Afrikaanse Republiek		15-10-62	T	14-11-62
Chili		09-01-61	T	08-02-61
Colombia	16-07-56	10-11-99	R	10-12-99
Xxxx	00-00-00
Xxxxxx		08-05-86	T	07-06-86
Denemarken	28-12-56	22-06-59	R	22-07-59
Xxxxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx	00-00-00
Xxxxxxxxx	20-06-56	20-07-59	R	19-08-59
Ecuador	20-06-56	04-06-74	R	04-07-74
Xx Xxxxxxxx	00-00-00
Xxxxxxx		08-01-97	T	07-02-97
Filipijnen	20-06-56	21-03-68	R	20-04-68
Finland		13-09-62	T	13-10-62
Frankrijk	05-09-56	24-06-60	R	24-07-60
Griekenland	20-06-56	01-11-65	R	01-12-65
Guatemala	26-12-56	25-04-57	R	25-05-57
Haïti	21-12-56	12-02-58	R	14-03-58
Heilige Stoel	20-06-56	05-10-64	R	04-11-64
Xxxxxxxxx		00-00-00	X	00-00-00
Xxxxxxx		26-10-95	T	25-11-95
Israël	20-06-56	04-04-57	R	25-05-57

Partij	Onder- tekening	Ratificatie	Type*	In werking	Opzeg- ging	Buiten werking
Italië	01-08-56	28-07-58	R	27-08-58
Joegoslavië (< 25-06-1991)	31-12-56	29-05-59	R	28-06-59
Kaapverdië		13-09-85	T	13-10-85
Kazachstan		28-03-00	T	27-04-00
Kirgistan		27-05-04	T	26-06-04
Kroatië		20-09-93	VG	08-10-91
Liberia		16-09-05	T	16-10-05
Luxemburg		01-11-71	T	01-12-71
Macedonië, de voormalige Joegoslavische Republiek		10-03-94	VG	17-11-91
Marokko		18-03-57	T	25-05-57
Mexico	20-06-56	23-07-92	R	22-08-92
Moldavië		24-07-06	T	23-08-06
Monaco	20-06-56	28-06-61	R	28-07-61
Montenegro		23-10-06	VG	03-06-06
Nederlanden, het Koninkrijk der – Nederland: – in Europa – Xxxxxxx – Xxxx Xxxxxxxxx – Xxxx – Xxxxx – Xxxxxxx – Sint Maarten	20-06-56	31-07-62 – – – – – –	R	25-05-57 10-10-10 10-10-10 10-10-10 01-01-86 10-10-10 10-10-10
Xxxxx-Xxxxxxx		00-00-00	X	28-03-86
Niger		15-02-65	T	17-03-65
Noorwegen		25-10-57	T	24-11-57
Xxxxxxxx		00-00-00	X	00-00-00
Xxxxxxxxxx	21-12-56	16-07-69	R	15-08-69
Pakistan		14-07-59	T	13-08-59

Partij	Onder- tekening	Ratificatie	Type*	In werking	Opzeg- ging	Buiten werking
Polen		13-10-60	T	12-11-60
Portugal		25-01-65	T	24-02-65
Roemenië		10-04-91	T	10-05-91
Servië		12-03-01	VG	27-04-92
Seychellen		01-11-04	T	01-12-04
Slovenië		06-07-92	VG	25-06-91
Xxxxxxxxx		00-00-00	XX	00-00-00
Xxxxxx		00-00-00	X	00-00-00
Xxx Xxxxx	20-06-56	07-08-58	R	06-09-58
Suriname		12-10-79	T	11-11-79
Tsjechië		30-09-93	VG	01-01-93
Tsjechoslowakije (<01-01-1993)		03-10-58	T	02-11-58
Tunesië		16-10-68	T	15-11-68
Turkije		02-06-71	T	02-07-71
Xxxxxxx		00-00-00	X	00-00-00
Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx		13-03-75	T	12-04-75
Zweden	04-12-56	01-10-58	R	31-10-58
Zwitserland		05-10-77	T	04-11-77
* O=Ondertekening zonder voorbehoud of vereiste van ratificatie, R=Bekrachtiging, aanvaarding, goedkeuring of kennisgeving, T=Toetreding, VG=Voortgezette gebonden- heid, NB=Niet bekend

Uitgebreid tot	In werking	Buiten werking
Norfolk	12-02-1985

Uitbreidingen Australië

Frankrijk

Uitgebreid tot	In werking	Buiten werking
Comoren, de (< 06-07-1975)	24-07-1960	06-07-1975
Djibouti (< 27-06-1977)	24-07-1960	27-06-1977
Xxxxx-Xxxxxxxxx	00-00-0000
Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx	24-07-1960
Sint Pierre en Xxxxxxxx	00-00-0000

Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx

Uitgebreid tot	In werking	Buiten werking
Jersey	30-07-2003
Man	29-11-1984

Verklaringen, voorbehouden en bezwaren

Algerije, 10 september 1969

The Democratic and Popular Republic of Algeria does not consider itself bound by the provisions of article 16 of the Convention concerning the competence of the International Court of Justice and affirms that the agreement of all the parties concerned is required in each case before a dispute can be brought before the International Court of Justice.

Argentinië, 29 november 1972

(a) The Argentine Republic reserves the right, with respect to article 10 of the Convention, to restrict the application of the expression “highest priority” in the light of the provisions governing exchange controls in Argentina.

(b)In the event that another Contracting Party extends the application of the Convention to territories over which the Argentine Republic exer- cises sovereignty, such extension shall in no way affect the latter’s rights (the reference is to article 12 of the Convention).

(c) The Argentine Government reserves the right not to apply the proce- dure provided for in article 16 of the Convention in any dispute directly or indirectly related to the territories referred to in its declaration concerning article 12.

Bezwaar door Verenigd Koninkrijk, 13 maart 1975

With reference to article 17 (1) of the Convention [{] the Gov- ernment of the United Kingdom [objects] to reservations (b) and

(c) made by Argentina in respect of articles 12 and 16 upon accession to the Convention.

Australië, 12 februari 1985

Australia wishes to declare, in accordance with Article 12, that with the exception of the Territory of Norfolk Island, the Convention shall not be applicable to the territories for the International relations of which Aus- tralia is responsible.

Belarus, 14 november 1996 [{]

Pursuant to article 3, paragraph 2, we have the honour to inform you that, for the recovery of maintenance in the territory of the Republic of Belarus, the Transmitting Agencies of the States parties to the Conven- tion are obliged to submit the following documents:

1. Xxxxxxxx’x application for the recognition and execution of the court decision.

2. The court decision or a certified copy thereof and the official docu- ment concerning the decision’s entry into force.

3. The document indicating that the party against whom the decision was taken and who did not take part in the court proceedings was duly notified or represented.

4. The document confirming partial execution of decisions at the time of its transmittal. Samples of the aforementioned documents are annexed hereto.

[{]

Colombia, 27 oktober 2003

Proceedings relating to maintenance for minors

“Maintenance” is understood to mean everything essential for the sup- port, housing, clothing, medical treatment, recreation, comprehensive training and education or instruction of the minor. Maintenance shall include the obligation to pay the mother’s pregnancy and childbirth expenses. Article 133, Decree No. 2737 of 1989, Minors’ Code.

Every minor is entitled to the protection, care and assistance necessary to achieve adequate physical, mental, moral and social development, and such rights are recognized from the time of conception. Article 3 of Decree No. 2737, Minors’ Code.

In the event of non-compliance with the maintenance obligation towards a minor, a request for conciliation may be submitted to the Family Ombudsman, the competent judges, the Family Commissioner or the Corrections Inspector of the minor’s place of residence by either parent, by the child’s relatives, by the guardian or person caring for the child or motu proprio. Article 136, Decree No. 2737 of 1989, Minors’ Code.

The right to claim maintenance may not be waived and is non-transferable in the event of death. The right to claim maintenance may not be sold or assigned in any way.

The person owing maintenance (respondent) may not ask the claimant to offset that debt with sums owed to him by the claimant.

Even if the parents have been deprived of parental authority, their main- tenance obligation does not cease. This obligation ceases when the minor is adopted.

As long as the respondent does not fulfil or agree to fulfil the mainte- nance obligation towards the minor, he may not claim custody and per- sonal care or exercise other rights over the minor.

When necessary, the judge will decide who is to have custody and care of the minor(s) on whose behalf the proceedings were instituted, with- out prejudice to the relevant judicial actions. Article 150, Decree No. 2737, Minors’ Code.

An expectant mother may claim maintenance in respect of the offspring of the legitimate father (husband) or of the man who has recognized paternity in the case of a child to be born out of wedlock. Article 135, Decree No. 2737 of 1989, Minors’ Code.

Conciliation

Act No. 23 of 1991, Act No. 446 of 1998 and Act No. 640 of 2001 Article 35 of Act No. 640 of 2001. “Admissibility requirement. In cases suitable for conciliation, extrajudicial conciliation as of right is an admissibility requirement for application to the civil, administrative law, labour and family courts, as specified in this Act for each of these areas.” Accordingly, in requests for imposition of maintenance payments for a minor, the child’s mother or father or the child’s relatives or officials dealing with the case may initiate conciliation with the person obligated to pay such maintenance.

In this case, the (non-compliant) person obligated to pay maintenance will be summoned to the office of the Family Commissioner, the Family Ombudsman or the competent judge to try to reach agreement on the amount of the maintenance payments, the means of making them, their timing and guarantees of observance. The respondent may authorize deduction from his salary of the agreed amounts.

When conciliation has produced agreement on the maintenance figure, method of payment, timing of the payments and relevant guarantee, a record will be prepared for signature by the presiding official and the parties. The official will then approve it by means of a writ and the con- ciliation will thus become enforceable; in other words, in case of non- compliance by the respondent, maintenance enforcement proceedings will be initiated.

If the person summoned does not appear, after being summoned twice and after the reason for the summons has been given, or if the concili- ation fails, the official may establish a provisional maintenance figure and the writ establishing it will be enforceable. The official must submit the claim for maintenance to the competent judge in order for the figure provisionally established to be confirmed by the judge.

Maintenance conciliations may vary depending on the circumstances of the person obligated to pay maintenance and the needs of the person

receiving the financial support. In addition, the judicial decision award- ing maintenance may be reviewed in order to revise the maintenance fig- ure, when the respondent is the father of another minor or other minors. The conciliation record must contain the following information:

Place, date and time of the conciliation hearing; Name of the Conciliator;

Name of the persons summoned to the conciliation and indication of who attended the proceedings;

Brief account of the claims that are the subject of the conciliation; Agreement reached by the parties during the proceedings.

Each of the parties participating in the conciliation must receive a copy of the record.

Claims for maintenance for minors

Claims for maintenance for minors are dealt with in the manner estab- lished in Decree No. 2737 of 1989 (Minors’ Code); as specified in Decree No. 2272 of 1989, the decision is not subject to appeal.

Claims for maintenance must contain the name of the parties, their address for notification purposes (place of residence, domicile, wherea- bouts or place of work), the amount of maintenance claimed, the justi- fication for the claim and the evidence adduced and must be accompa- nied by any documents in the possession of the claimant. Claims may be submitted orally or in writing. If any document is missing that the claimant is unable to attach, the judge may, at the request of a party or ex officio, order the relevant authority to issue the document.

If he deems it necessary, the judge may order attachment of the respond- ent’s salary (in an amount that he considers appropriate) in the writ authorizing submission of the claim (in order to guarantee fulfilment of the maintenance obligation), for which purpose he shall communicate officially with the respondent’s employer. He may also order retention of an amount that he considers appropriate from the respondent’s severance pay, in order to guarantee the minor’s maintenance in the event that the respondent resigns or is laid off from his employment.

Evidence

Any judicial decision must be based on the evidence duly and regularly produced in the proceedings. Article 174 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Means of proof. The means of proof are statements by the parties, responses under oath, testimony of third parties, expert opinions, physi- cal examination of exhibits, documents, circumstantial evidence and any other means that may help the judge to form an opinion. Article 175 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Evidence located abroad

When the civil proceedings require formalities on foreign territory, the judge may, depending on the nature and urgency of the matter:

1. Send letters rogatory, through the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, to one of the judicial authorities in the country where the formalities are to take place so that it may conduct them and send the evidence back through the diplomatic or consular agent of Colombia or of a friendly country.

2. Directly request the consul or diplomatic agent of Colombia in the country concerned to conduct the formalities in accordance with national legislation and to send the evidence back directly. The consuls and diplo- matic agents of Colombia abroad are authorized to conduct all the judi- cial formalities in civil cases entrusted to them under article 193 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Evidence is provided at the request of the parties or following an offi- cial order from the judge, if he considers it necessary for verification of the facts alleged by the parties. The cost of providing evidence is shared equally by the parties, without prejudice to the judge’s decision regard- ing the costs of the proceedings.

Deposition. Statement made before the judge in exercise of his func- tions. Other statements are extra-judicial.

Questioning. The judge may officially summon the parties to answer under oath any questions he wishes to put to them. He may also sum- mon one of the parties, at the request of the other, provided that the request is made in due form.

Oath. When the law authorizes the judge to request any of the parties to take an oath, the oath must be taken at the time when the evidence is to be presented, at the date and time appointed.

Statements by third parties. All persons are obliged to make statements if requested, except in the cases specified by law.

Expert opinion. An opinion requiring the participation of experts or per- sons specializing in specific scientific, technical or artistic subjects.

Physical examination of exhibits. Proof established by verification of certain facts germane to the proceedings.

Circumstantial evidence. In order for a fact to be considered as circum- stantial evidence, it must be fully proved in the proceedings. The judge is authorized to deduce circumstantial evidence from the behaviour of the parties.

Documents. Documents may be public or private. Public documents are those issued by a public official in the performance of his duties or with his intervention. Private documents are those not meeting the require- ments to be considered as public documents.

Authentic document. A document regarding which certainty exists as to the person who drafted, wrote or signed it. A public document is pre- sumed to be authentic, unless the contrary is proved by evidence of for- gery. Private documents are authentic if they meet the requirements specified by law.

In order for proceedings to be initiated for recovery of maintenance for minors, the relationship between the minor claiming maintenance and the person obligated to provide it must be proved. This shall be done by reference to the Civil Registry where the minor’s birth is recorded. The financial ability of the respondent to provide maintenance must also be proved, even summarily (reason to believe). If such ability cannot be proved, an analysis will have to be made of the respondent’s social posi-

tion and habits and it will ultimately be presumed that the respondent will pay the minor the minimum wage.

In order to demonstrate the respondent’s ability to pay, a certificate of income and statutory allowances, if he is employed, may be requested as evidence (documentary or oral). The Land Registry Office may be requested to report on immovable property owned by the respondent. The Transit and Transport Secretariat may be asked to determine the ownership of automobiles registered to the respondent. The Chamber of Commerce may be asked to establish the respondent’s ownership of or participation in commercial firms. The national Tax Office may be asked to provide the respondent’s tax return, and credit or banking institutions may be asked to report on the respondent’s balances and on credit card usage. Oral evidence may also be sought, in which persons are asked about the respondent’s income.

Maintenance is due at the time of the first claim and must be paid monthly in advance, during the first five days of the month in question. Article 421 of the Civil Code, in conformity with the second paragraph of article 498 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Decree No. 2282 of 1989. The maintenance order may specify:

An amount to be deducted from the respondent’s pay or salary, which may not exceed 50 per cent of his monthly income. Establishment of a fund, the income from which will be used to make the established main- tenance payments.

A specific sum of money, depending on the respondent’s demonstrated ability to pay.

Maintenance payments will increase annually, either in order to reflect cost-of-living increases or as agreed between the parties during the conciliation.

Maintenance enforcement proceedings

In the event of non-compliance with the maintenance obligation agreed during the conciliation or decreed by decision of the judge, the family judge concerned may initiate maintenance enforcement proceedings, with the legal consequences, if necessary, of attachment and auction of property.

Complaints of failure to provide maintenance

“Any person who without good reason fails to provide maintenance legally due to his relatives in the ascending line, descendants, adopter or adoptee, or spouse shall be liable to imprisonment for a term ranging from one (1) to three (3) years and a fine ranging from ten (10) to twenty

(20) times the monthly legal minimum wage in force.”

“The penalty shall be imprisonment ranging from two (2) to four (4) years and a fine ranging from fifteen (15) to twenty-five (25) times the monthly legal minimum wage in force if the failure to provide mainte- nance concerns a minor under fourteen (14) years of age.” Article 233 of the Penal Code.

“Aggravating circumstances. The penalty specified in the preceding arti- cle shall be increased by up to one third if the respondent has fraudu-

lently concealed, reduced or encumbered his income or assets in order to avoid paying maintenance.” Article 234 of the Penal Code. “Repetition. Enforcement of the sentence shall not preclude the initia- tion of further proceedings if the person concerned again fails to make maintenance payments.” Article 235 of the Penal Code.

Israël, 4 april 1957

Article 5: The Transmitting Agency shall transmit under paragraph 1 any order, final or provisional, and any other judicial act, obtained by the claimant for the payment of maintenance in a competent tribunal of Israel, and, where necessary and possible, the record of the proceedings in which such order was made.

Article 10: Israel reserves the right:

a) to take the necessary measures to prevent transfers of funds under this Article for purposes other than the bona fide payment of existing maintenance obligations;

b) to limit the amounts transferable pursuant to this Article, to amounts necessary for subsistence.

Kaapverdië, 2 november 1985

[{] the evidence normally required under the law of the State of the Receiving Agency for the proof of maintenance claims, the manner in which such evidence should be submitted, and other requirements to be complied with under such law, are as follows:

(a) Certification of the degree of relationship: marriage certificate, where the claimant is the spouse and birth certificate in the case of children entitled to a maintenance allowance.

(b)A declaration from the employer of the claimant stating his income if he is employed; if not, a declaration issued by the administrative auth- orities of the place of residence certifying that the claimant does not have an income.

Moldavië, 24 juli 2006

Until the full re-establishment of the territorial integrity of the Republic of Moldova, the provisions of the Convention shall be applied only on the territory controlled effectively by the authorities of the Republic of Moldova.

Moldavië, 7 november 2007

In its capacity as Receiving Agency, the Ministry of Justice shall limit the performance of its duties to receiving documents from foreign claim- ants and, where appropriate, communicating replies. It will also have the right, pursuant to article 3, paragraph 3, of the aforementioned Conven- tion, to appoint the national authority authorized to act on behalf of the claimant.

Pursuant to article 3, paragraph 2, of the aforementioned Convention, the evidence required for the proof of maintenance claims is as follows:

– the power of attorney granted to the Receiving Agency of the coun- try in which the respondent is domiciled;

– a certified copy of the marriage or divorce certificate, as appropriate;

– a certified copy of the child’s birth certificate.

For claimants over the age of 18 who do not have a regular income, the following is also required:

– a statement of monthly income and a certificate concerning the increase in maintenance;

– any other documents attesting to the claimant’s delicate financial situation (school certificates, medical certificates in the case of disabled persons, etc.);

– the bank account of the claimant into which the respondent may transfer maintenance payments from abroad;

– photographs, where available, of the claimant and respondent;

– such other additional documents as may be requested by the courts. The aforementioned documents must be submitted in duplicate, both copies having been duly authorized.

The Republic of Moldova hereby declares that all documents submitted to the Republic of Moldova pursuant to the provisions of the Conven- tion must be accompanied by certified translations into Moldovan.

Nederlanden, het Koninkrijk der, 31 juli 1962

With regard to Article 1 of the Convention, the Government of xxx Xxxx- dom of the Netherlands reserves the right not to facilitate the recovery of maintenance under this article if the claimant and the respondent are both in the territory of the Netherlands, Suriname, the Netherlands Antil- les or Dutch New Guinea, and are receiving benefit or the equivalent under the Social Assistance Act, and if maintenance is normally not recovered from respondents in this situation, having regard to the cir- cumstances of the case.

Nederlanden, het Koninkrijk der, 8 juli 2011

With regard to Article 1 of the Convention, the Government of xxx Xxxx- dom of the Netherlands reserves the right not to facilitate the recovery of maintenance under this article if the claimant and the respondent are both in the territory of the European part of the Netherlands, Aruba, Curaçao, Sint Maarten and the Caribbean part of the Netherlands (the islands of Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba), and are receiving benefit or the equivalent under the Social Assistance Act, and if maintenance is normally not recovered from respondents in this situation, having regard to the circumstances of the case.

Polen, 13 oktober 1960

The person authorized to file a claim on a maintenance obligation against a respondent residing abroad, can deposit an application on this subject, accompanied by the respective explanatory documents, as provided in Article 3 paragraph 4 of the Convention, in the County Court

of his residence. The County Court will transmit this application to the Ministry of Justice for further consideration. The County Courts will not impose any charges for the functions connected with the acceptance of applications and their enclosures, in accordance with the provisions of Article 4 of the Convention.

Seychellen, 1 november 2004

The Republic of Seychelles reserves the right, with respect to article 10 of the Convention, to restrict the application of the expression ’highest priority’ in the light of the legal provisions governing exchange control in Seychelles.

Tunesië, 16 oktober 1968

(1) Persons living abroad may only claim the advantages provided for in the Convention when considered non-residents under the exchange regulations in force in Tunisia.

(2) A dispute may only be referred to the International Court of Justice with the agreement of all the parties to the dispute.

Bezwaar door Polen, 5 februari 1969

The Government of the Polish People’s Republic wishes to ex- press its objection, in accordance with article 17, paragraph 1, of the said Convention, to the first two reservations made by the Government of Tunisia in its instrument of accession.

Zweden, 1 oktober 1958

Article 1: Sweden reserves the right to reject, where the circumstances of the case under consideration appear to make this necessary, any appli- cation for legal support aimed at the recovery of maintenance from a person who entered Sweden as a political refugee.

Article 9: Where the proceedings are pending in Sweden, the exemptions in the payment of costs and the facilities provided in article 9, para- graphs 1 and 2, shall be granted only to nationals of or stateless persons resident in a another State Party to the Convention or to any person who would otherwise enjoy such advantages under an agreement concluded with the State of which he is a national.

Zweden, 11 november 1988

Sweden withdraws the reservations made in respect of Article 9, para- graph 2 in the Convention done at New York on 20 June 1956 on the recovery abroad of maintenance, and makes the following limited reser- vations in respect of paragraph 1 of the same Article:

Where the proceedings are pending in Sweden, the exemptions in the payment of costs and the facilities provided in paragraph 1 shall be granted only to persons resident in a State Party to the Convention or to any person who would otherwise enjoy such advantages under an agree- ment concluded with the State of which he is a national.

G. INWERKINGTREDING‌

Zie Trb. 1962, 106 en Trb. 1970, 31

Wat betreft het Koninkrijk der Nederlanden, geldt het Verdrag dat voorheen voor Nederland (het Europese deel), de Nederlandse Antillen en Aruba gold, vanaf 10 oktober 2010 voor Nederland (het Europese en het Caribische deel), Aruba, Curaçao en Sint Maarten.

J. VERWIJZINGEN

Zie voor verwijzingen en overige verdragsgegevens Trb. 1957, 121,

Trb. 1962, 106, Trb. 1969, 2, Trb. 1970, 31, Trb. 1980, 28 en Trb. 1996,

54.

Verbanden

Het verdrag wordt in de betrekkingen tussen verdragsluitende partijen vervangen door:

Titel : Verdrag inzake de internationale inning van xxxxxxxx- derhoud voor kinderen en andere familieleden;

’s-Gravenhage, 23 november 0000

Xxxxx : Trb. 2011, 144 (Frans, Engels en vertaling)

Titel : Protocol inzake het recht dat van toepassing is op onderhoudsverplichtingen;

’s-Gravenhage, 23 november 0000

Xxxxx : Trb. 2011, 145 (Frans, Engels en vertaling)

Overige verwijzingen

Titel : Handvest van de Verenigde Naties;

San Francisco, 26 juni 1945

Laatste Trb. : Trb. 2012, 200

Titel : Statuut van het Internationaal Gerechtshof; San Francisco, 26 juni 1945

Laatste Trb. : Trb. 2012, 128

Titel : Verdrag nopens de erkenning en de tenuitvoerlegging van beslissingen over onderhoudsverplichtingen jegens kinderen;

’s-Gravenhage, 15 april 1958

Laatste Trb. : Trb. 2013, 121

Titel : Verdrag inzake de erkenning en de tenuitvoerlegging van beslissingen over onderhoudsverplichtingen;

’s-Gravenhage, 2 oktober 1973

Laatste Trb. : Trb. 2013, 23

Titel : Verdrag inzake de wet die van toepassing is op onderhoudsverplichtingen;

’s-Gravenhage, 2 oktober 1973

Laatste Trb. : Trb. 2013, 24

Uitgegeven de twaalfde mei 2014.

De Minister van Buitenlandse Zaken,

F.C.G.M. TIMMERMANS

trb-2014-88

ISSN 0920 - 2218

’s-Gravenhage 2014