Contract

31 (1988) Nr. 7‌‌‌‌‌

TRAC T A TENBLAD

VAN HET

K O N I N K R I J K D E R N E D E R L A N D E N

JAARGANG 2011 Nr. 128

A. TITEL

Verdrag tot bestrijding van wederrechtelijke gedragingen gericht tegen de veiligheid van de zeevaart;

Rome, 10 maart 1988

B. TEKST

De Engelse en de Franse tekst van het Verdrag zijn geplaatst in

Trb. 1989, 17. Zie voor een correctie Trb. 1992, 75.

De Engelse en de Franse tekst van het Protocol tot wijziging van 14 oktober 2005 zijn geplaatst in Trb. 2006, 223.

C. VERTALING

Zie Trb. 1989, 17, voor een correctie Trb. 1992, 75, en Trb. 2006, 223.

D. PARLEMENT

Zie Trb. 1992, 75 en Trb. 1993, 29.

Artikel 1 van de Rijkswet van 28 oktober 2010 (Stb. 2011, 23) luidt als volgt:

„Artikel 1

Het op 14 oktober 2005 te Londen tot stand gekomen Protocol van 2005 bij het Verdrag tot bestrijding van wederrechtelijke gedragingen gericht tegen de veiligheid van de zeevaart, waarvan de Engelse en Franse tekst alsmede de Nederlandse vertaling zijn geplaatst in Tracta- tenblad 2006, 223, wordt goedgekeurd voor het gehele Koninkrijk.”.

Deze Rijkswet is gecontrasigneerd door de Minister van Veiligheid en Justitie I. W. OPSTELTEN, de Minister van Buitenlandse Zaken X. XXXXXXXXX, de Staatssecretaris van Infrastructuur en Milieu J. J. ATSMA en de Minister van Defensie J. S. J. HILLEN.

Voor de behandeling in de Staten-Generaal zie Kamerstukken II 2009/ 2010, 2010/2011, 32256 (R1906); Hand. II 2010/2011, 32256 (R1906); Kamerstukken I 2010/2011, 32256 (R1906); Hand. I 2010/2011, 32256 (R1906).

E. PARTIJGEGEVENS

Zie Trb. 1989, 17, rubriek F van Trb. 1992, 75 en Trb. 2006, 223.

Partij	Onder- tekening	Ratificatie	Type*	In werking	Opzeg- ging	Buiten werking
Afghanistan		23-09-03	T	22-12-03
Albanië		19-06-02	T	17-09-02
Algerije		11-02-98	T	12-05-98
Andorra		17-07-06	T	15-10-06
Antigua en Barbuda		12-10-09	T	10-01-10
Argentinië	10-03-88	17-08-93	R	15-11-93
Armenië		08-06-05	T	06-09-05
Australië		19-02-93	T	20-05-93
Azerbeidzjan		26-01-04	T	25-04-04
Bahama’s	10-03-88	25-10-05	R	23-01-06
Bahrein		21-10-05	T	19-01-06
Bangladesh		09-06-05	T	07-09-05
Xxxxxxxx		00-00-00	X	00-00-00
Xxxxxxx	02-03-89	04-12-02	X	00-00-00
Xxxxxx	09-03-89	11-04-05	R	10-07-05
Benin		31-08-06	T	29-11-06
Bolivia		13-02-02	T	14-05-02
Bosnië en Herzegovina		28-07-03	T	26-10-03

Partij	Onder- tekening	Ratificatie	Type*	In werking	Opzeg- ging	Buiten werking
Botswana		14-09-00	T	13-12-00
Brazilië	10-03-88	25-10-05	X	00-00-00
Xxxxxx	03-02-89	04-12-03	R	03-03-04
Bulgarije	10-03-88	08-07-99	R	06-10-99
Burkina Faso		15-01-04	T	14-04-04
Cambodja		18-08-06	T	16-11-06
Canada	10-03-88	18-06-93	R	16-09-93
Chili	10-03-88	22-04-94	R	21-07-94
China	20-08-88	20-08-91	R	01-03-92
Comoren, de		06-03-08	T	04-06-08
Cookeilanden		00-00-00	X	00-00-00
Xxxxx Xxxx	10-03-88	25-03-03	R	23-06-03
Cuba		20-11-01	T	18-02-02
Xxxxxx		00-00-00	X	00-00-00
Xxxxxxxxxx	26-10-88	25-08-95	R	23-11-95
Djibouti		09-06-04	T	07-09-04
Dominica		31-08-01	T	29-11-01
Dominicaanse Republiek, de		03-07-08	T	01-10-08
Duitsland		06-11-90	T	01-03-92
Ecuador	10-03-88	10-03-03	R	08-06-03
Egypte	16-08-88	08-01-93	R	08-04-93
El Salvador		07-12-00	T	07-03-01
Equatoriaal Guinee		15-01-04	T	14-04-04
Estland		15-02-02	T	16-05-02
Fiji-eilanden		21-05-08	T	19-08-08
Filipijnen, de	10-03-88	06-01-04	R	05-04-04
Finland	18-11-88	12-11-98	R	10-02-99

Partij	Onder- tekening	Ratificatie	Type*	In werking	Opzeg- ging	Buiten werking
Frankrijk	10-03-88	02-12-91	R	01-03-92
Gambia		01-11-91	T	01-03-92
Georgië		11-08-06	T	09-11-06
Ghana		01-11-02	T	30-01-03
Grenada		09-01-02	T	09-04-02
Griekenland	10-03-88	11-06-93	R	09-09-93
Guatemala		26-08-09	T	24-11-09
Guinee		01-02-05	T	02-05-05
Guinee-Bissau		14-10-08	T	12-01-09
Guyana		02-01-03	T	02-04-03
Honduras		17-05-05	T	15-08-05
Hongarije	10-03-88	09-11-89	X	00-00-00
Xxxxxxx		10-09-04	T	09-12-04
IJsland		28-05-02	T	26-08-02
Xxxxx		00-00-00	X	00-00-00
Xxxx	00-00-00
Xxxx		30-10-09	T	28-01-10
Israël	10-03-88	06-01-09	R	06-04-09
Italië	10-03-88	26-01-90	R	01-03-92
Jamaica		17-08-05	T	15-11-05
Japan		24-04-98	T	23-07-98
Jemen		30-06-00	T	28-09-00
Jordanië	10-03-88	02-07-04	R	30-09-04
Xxxxxxxxxx		00-00-00	X	00-00-00
Xxxxxxxxxx		24-11-03	T	22-02-04
Kenia		21-01-02	T	21-04-02
Kiribati		17-11-05	T	16-02-06
Xxxxxxx		00-00-00	X	28-09-03

Partij	Onder- tekening	Ratificatie	Type*	In werking	Opzeg- ging	Buiten werking
Kroatië		18-08-05	T	16-11-05
Letland		04-12-02	T	04-03-03
Xxxxxxx		00-00-00	X	00-00-00
Xxxxxxx	10-03-88	05-10-95	R	03-01-96
Libië		08-08-02	T	06-11-02
Liechtenstein		08-11-02	T	06-02-03
Litouwen		30-01-03	T	30-04-03
Luxemburg		05-01-11	T	05-04-11
Macedonië, de voormalige Joegoslavische Republiek		07-08-07	T	05-11-07
Madagaskar		15-09-06	T	14-12-06
Mali		29-04-02	T	28-07-02
Malta		20-11-01	T	18-02-02
Marokko	10-03-88	08-01-02	R	08-04-02
Marshalleilan- den, de		29-11-94	T	27-02-95
Mauritanië		17-01-08	T	16-04-08
Mauritius		03-08-04	T	01-11-04
Mexico		13-05-94	T	11-08-94
Micronesia		10-02-03	T	11-05-03
Moldavië		11-10-05	T	09-01-06
Monaco		25-01-02	T	25-04-02
Mongolië		22-11-05	T	20-02-06
Montenegro		03-06-06	VG	03-06-06
Mozambique		08-01-03	T	08-04-03
Myanmar		19-09-03	T	18-12-03
Namibië		10-07-04	T	18-10-04
Xxxxx		00-00-00	T	09-11-05

Partij	Onder- tekening	Ratificatie	Type*	In werking	Opzeg- ging	Buiten werking
Nederlanden, het Koninkrijk der – Nederland: – in Europa – Xxxxxxx – Xxxx Xxxxxxxxx – Xxxx – Xxxxx – Xxxxxxx – Sint Maarten	23-01-89	05-03-92 08-10-10 08-10-10 08-10-10 15-12-04 – –	R R	03-06-92 10-10-10 10-10-10 10-10-10 15-12-04 – –
Xxxxxxxxx		00-00-00	X	00-00-00
Xxxxx-Xxxxxxx	08-12-88	10-06-99	R	08-09-99
Niger		30-08-06	T	28-11-06
Nigeria	09-09-88	24-02-04	R	24-05-04
Niue		22-06-09	T	20-09-09
Noorwegen	10-03-88	18-04-91	R	01-03-92
Oekraïne	02-03-89	21-04-94	R	20-07-94
Oezbekistan		25-09-00	T	24-12-00
Oman		24-09-90	T	01-03-92
Oostenrijk	10-03-88	28-12-89	R	01-03-92
Pakistan		20-09-00	T	19-12-00
Palau		04-12-01	T	04-03-02
Panama		03-07-02	T	01-10-02
Xxxxxxxx		00-00-00	X	00-00-00
Xxxx		19-07-01	T	17-10-01
Polen	22-11-88	25-06-91	R	01-03-92
Portugal		05-01-96	T	04-04-96
Qatar		18-09-03	T	17-12-03
Roemenië		02-06-93	T	31-08-93
Russische Federatie	02-03-89	04-05-01	R	02-08-01
Saint Kitts en Nevis		17-01-02	T	17-04-02

Partij	Onder- tekening	Ratificatie	Type*	In werking	Opzeg- ging	Buiten werking
Saint Lucia		20-05-04	T	18-08-04
Saint Vincent en de Grenadines		09-10-01	T	07-01-02
Samoa		18-05-04	T	16-08-04
Sao Tomé en Principe		05-05-06	T	03-08-06
Saudi-Xxxxxx	10-03-88	02-02-06	R	03-05-06
Senegal		09-08-04	T	07-11-04
Servië		10-05-04	T	08-08-04
Seychellen, de	24-01-89	24-01-89	R	01-03-92
Singapore		03-02-04	T	03-05-04
Slovenië		18-07-03	T	16-10-03
Slowakije		08-12-00	T	08-03-01
Soedan		22-05-00	T	20-08-00
Spanje	28-09-88	07-07-89	X	00-00-00
Xxx Xxxxx		04-09-00	T	03-12-00
Swaziland		17-04-03	T	16-07-03
Syrië		24-03-03	T	22-06-03
Tadzjikistan		12-08-05	T	10-11-05
Tanzania		11-05-05	T	09-08-05
Togo		10-03-03	T	08-06-03
Tonga		06-12-02	T	06-03-03
Xxxxxxxx xx Xxxxxx		00-00-00	X	00-00-00
Xxxxxxxx		10-12-04	T	10-03-05
Tunesië		06-03-98	T	04-06-98
Turkije	10-03-88	06-03-98	R	04-06-98
Turkmenistan		08-06-99	T	06-09-99
Tuvalu		02-12-05	T	02-03-06

Partij	Onder- tekening	Ratificatie	Type*	In werking	Opzeg- ging	Buiten werking
Uganda		11-11-03	T	09-02-04
Uruguay		10-08-01	T	08-11-01
Vanuatu		00-00-00	X	00-00-00
Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx, het	22-09-88	03-05-91	R	00-00-00
Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, de		00-00-00	X	00-00-00
Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxx van Amerika, de	10-03-88	06-12-94	R	06-03-95
Vietnam		12-07-02	T	10-10-02
Zuid-Afrika		08-07-05	T	06-10-05
Zuid-Korea		14-05-03	T	12-08-03
Zweden	10-03-88	13-09-90	R	01-03-92
Zwitserland	10-03-88	12-03-93	R	10-06-93
* O=Ondertekening zonder voorbehoud of vereiste van ratificatie, R=Bekrachtiging, aanvaarding, goedkeuring of kennisgeving, T=Toetreding, VG=Voortgezette gebonden- heid, NB=Niet bekend

Uitgebreid tot	In werking	Buiten werking
Xxxxxxxx XXX	00-00-0000

Xxxxxxxxxxxxx Xxxxx

Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx, het

Uitgebreid tot	In werking	Buiten werking
Man	08-02-1999

Verklaringen, voorbehouden en bezwaren

Algerije, 11 februari 1998

The Government of the People’s Democratic Republic of Algeria does not consider itself bound by the provisions of article 16, paragraph 1 of the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts Against the Safety of Maritime Navigation concluded in Rome on 10 March 1988. The

Government of the People’s Democratic Republic of Algeria declares that for a dispute to be submitted to arbitration or to the International Court of Justice, the agreement of all the parties involved shall be nec- essary in each case.

Andorra, 17 juli 2006

Andorra is a landlocked State and, at the time of its accession to the Convention and the Protocol, has no official ships registered. However, in accordance with the Traffic Code of 10 June 1999, individuals of Andorran nationality and foreigners residing legally in the country may have their sports vessels entered in a register established by the Govern- ment of Andorra.

In this context, Andorra reserves the right recognized in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, in particular article 125, to request transit States (the Kingdom of Spain and the Republic of France) for right of access to and from the sea, and freedom of transit through their territories for that purpose.

We, the Co-princes, having read and considered the above-mentioned Convention and Protocol, hereby express the consent of the State to be bound by the provisions contained therein, and to that end we command issuance of this instrument of accession, signed by us and countersigned by the Head of the Government.

Argentinië, 17 augustus 1993

The Argentine Republic declares, in accordance with the provisions of article 16, paragraph 2, of the Convention, that it shall not be bound by any of the provisions of paragraph 1 of that article.

Armenië, 8 juni 2005

The Republic of Armenia declares that it does not consider itself bound by the 2nd sentence of Article 16, paragraph 1, of the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Maritime Navigation.

Azerbeidzjan, 26 januari 2004

In accordance with paragraph 2 of Article 16 of the Convention, the Republic of Azerbaijan declares that it does not consider itself bound by paragraph 1 of Article 16.

Brazilië, 25 oktober 2005

[{] with reservation to article 6, paragraph 2; article 8 and article 16, paragraph 1 of the Convention and to article 3, paragraph 2 of the Protocol.

Canada, 18 juni 1993

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 6, paragraph 3 of the Convention, the Secretary-General has been informed that Canada has established

jurisdiction over offences in all of the cases cited in Article 6, paragraph 2 of the Convention.

Chili, 22 april 1994

In connection with the provisions of article 4 of the present Convention, the Government of Chile shall not apply the provisions thereof to inci- dents that occur in its internal waters and in the waters of Magellan Strait.

China, 20 augustus 1991

The People’s Republic of China shall not be bound by paragraph 1 of article 16 of the said Convention.

Cuba, 20 november 2001

The Republic of Cuba, in accordance with paragraph 2 of article 16, declares that it does not consider itself bound by the provisions of para- graph 1 of the aforesaid article, with respect to the settlement of disputes between States Parties, since it considers that such disputes should be settled by amicable agreement. Similarly, the Republic of Cuba reiter- ates that it does not recognize the compulsory jurisdiction of the Inter- national Court of Justice.

Denemarken, 25 augustus 1995

[{] with the qualification, however, that the Convention as well as the Protocol will not apply to the Faroes nor to Greenland, pending a fur- ther decision.

Duitsland, 6 november 1990

In accordance with article 16, paragraph 2, of the Convention the Fed- eral Republic of Germany declares that it does not consider itself bound by article 16, paragraph 1, of the Convention.

Egypte, 8 januari 1993

1. A reservation is made to article 16 on the peaceful settlement of dis- putes because it provides for the binding jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice, and also with regard to the application of the Conven- tion to seagoing ships in internal waters which are scheduled to navigate beyond territorial waters.

2. A reservation is made to article 6, paragraph 2, of the Convention and article 3, paragraph 2, of the Protocol because those articles permit the optional jurisdiction of blackmailed States (which are asked by the per- petrator of an act of terrorism to do or abstain from doing any act). This is in compliance with the provision of paragraph 4 of each of the two articles.

Frankrijk, 2 december 1991

1. As far as article 3, paragraph 2, is concerned the French Republic understands by “tentative”, “incitation”, “complicité” and “menace”, la tenative, l’incitation, la complicité and la menace as defined in the con- ditions envisaged by French criminal law.

2. The French Republic does not consider itself bound by the provisions of article 16, paragraph 1, according to which: “Any dispute between two or more States Parties concerning the interpretation or application of this Convention which cannot be settled through negotiation within a reasonable time shall, at the request of one of them, be submitted to arbi- tration. If, within six months from the date of the request for arbitration, the parties are unable to agree on the organization of the arbitration any one of those parties may refer the dispute to the International Court of Justice by request in conformity with the Statute of the Court.”

India, 15 oktober 1999

In accordance with Article 16(2) of the Convention for Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Maritime Navigation, 1988, the Government of the Republic of India hereby declares that it does not consider itself bound by the provisions of Article 16(1).

Irak, 10 maart 1988

This signature does not in any way imply recognition of Israel or entry into any relationship with it.

Bezwaar door Israël, 6 januari 2009

The Government of the State of Israel has noted that the reser- vation made upon the signature of Iraq of the aforementioned Convention contains a statement with respect to the State of Israel.

The Government of the State of Israel considers that such a state- ment, which is explicitly of a political nature, is incompatible with the purposes and objectives of the Convention.

The Government of the State of Israel, therefore, objects to the aforesaid statement made by Iraq.

Iran, 30 oktober 2009

Pursuant to Article 16, paragraph 2 of the Convention for the Suppres- sion of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Maritime Navigation, the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran declares that it does not consider itself bound by the provisions of Article 16, paragraph 1 of the Convention. The Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran affirms that the consent of all parties to such a dispute is necessary in each indi- vidual case, for the submission of the dispute to arbitration or to the International Court of Justice. The Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran can, if it deems appropriate, agree with the submission of the

dispute to arbitration in accordance with the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran and related domestic Law.

With regard to Article 11, paragraph 4, the Islamic Republic of Iran con- siders that the extradition would be applicable only to the State Party within the territorial jurisdiction of which the crime has occurred. In the case where an extradition agreement exists between the requesting State and the State in which the crime has occurred, the agreement shall be applied.

Israël, 6 januari 2009

Pusuant to Article 16, paragraph 2 of the Convention for the Suppres- sion of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Maritime Navigation, the Government of Israel declares that it does not consider itself bound by the provisions of Article 16, paragraph 1 of the Convention.

Jamaica, 17 augustus 2005

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 6, paragraph 2(c) of the Conven- tion, the Secretary-General has been informed that Jamaica has estab- lished jurisdiction over the offences set forth in Article 3.

Mexico, 13 mei 1994

Mexico’s accession to the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Maritime Navigation, 1988, and to its Proto- col for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Fixed Platforms Located on the Continental Shelf, 1988, is on the understand- ing that in matters relating to extradition, both article 11 of the Conven- tion and article 3 of the Protocol will be applied in the Republic of Mexico subject to the modalities and procedures laid down in the appli- cable provisions of national law.

Moldavië, 11 oktober 2005

Until the full re-establishment of the territorial integrity of the Republic of Moldova, the provisions of the Convention shall be applied only on the territory controlled by the authorities of the Republic of Moldova. The Republic of Moldova shall apply the provisions of article 8, para- graph 1 of the Convention as far as it will not infringe its own national legislation.

The Republic of Moldova declares that it shall establish its own juris- diction over the offences specified in article 3 of the Convention, in cases provided in article 6, paragraph 2 of this Convention.

According to article 16, paragraph 2 of the Convention, the Republic of Moldova does not consider itself bound by the provisions of article 16, paragraph 1 of the Convention.

Mozambique, 8 januari 2003

The Republic of Mozambique does not consider itself bound by the pro- visions of article 16, paragraph 1, of the Convention.

In this connection, the Republic of Mozambique states that, in each indi- vidual case, the consent of all Parties to such a dispute is necessary for the submission of the dispute to arbitration or to International Court of Justice.

Furthermore, the Republic of Mozambique declares that:

The Republic of Mozambique, in accordance with its Constitution and domestic laws, can not extradite Mozambique citizens.

Therefore, Mozambique citizens will be tried and sentenced in national courts.

Myanmar, 19 september 2003

The Government of the Union of Myanmar wished to express reserva- tion of Article 16(1) relating to

arbitration and does not consider itself bound by the same.

Paraguay, 12 november 2004

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 6 of the Convention, the Secretary- General has been informed that the Republic of Paraguay has established jurisdiction in accordance with Article 6, paragraph 2 of the Convention.

Portugal, 5 januari 1996

In face of its internal law Portugal considers that the handing over of the suspect mentioned in article 8 of the Convention can only be based on strong suspicions that he committed any of the crimes mentioned in arti- cle 3, and will always depend on a court decision. Furthermore it will not be admitted in the event that the crime ascribed entails death sentence.

Qatar, 18 september 2003

Subject to reservation in respect of article 16(a).

Russische Federatie, 4 mei 2001

The Russian Federation applies the provisions of point 1 of article 8 of the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts Against the Safety of Maritime Navigation to the extent to which they do not conflict with its own legislation.

Saudi-Xxxxxx, 2 februari 2006

This document announces the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia’s accession to and approval of the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts Against the Safety of Maritime Navigation and the Protocol for the Sup- pression of Unlawful Acts Against the Safety of Fixed Platforms Lo- cated on the Continental Shelf, with full reservation as to Article 11 and Article 16, paragraph 1, of the Convention.

Tunesië, 6 maart 1998

The Republic of Tunisia, in agreeing to accede to the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Maritime Navigation concluded in Rome on 10 March 1988, declares that it does not consider itself bound by the provisions of paragraph 1 of article 16 of the Con- vention and maintains that disputes concerning the interpretation or application of the Convention may be submitted to arbitration or to the International Court of Justice only with the prior agreement of all the parties involved.

Turkije, 6 maart 1998

In signing the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Maritime Navigation and the Protocol for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Fixed Platforms Located on the Continental Shelf, the Government of the Republic of Turkey, under the article 16(2) of the said Convention declares that it does not consider itself bound by the provisions of paragraph (1) of the article 16 of the said Convention.

Verenigd Koninkrijk, het, 3 mei 1991

[{] that until consultations with various territories under the territorial sovereignty of the United Kingdom are completed, the Convention and Protocol will apply in respect of the United Kingdom and Northern Ire- land only. Consultations with the territories are in hand and are expected to be completed by the end of 1991.

Verenigde Arabische Emiraten, de, 15 september 2005

The Government of the United Arab Emirates has taken cognizance of the provisions of the aforementioned Convention and Protocol and accedes to them with full reservation in respect of the provisions of arti- cle 16, paragraph 1 of the Convention, concerning the settlement of a dispute between States Parties to the Convention by arbitration or, if they are unable to agree on the organization of arbitration, by referral of the dispute to the International Court of Justice. It also enters a full res- ervation with respect to the provisions of article 1 of the Protocol, inso- far as they refer to article 16, paragraph 1 of the Convention for the Sup- pression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Maritime Navigation.

Vietnam, 12 juli 2000

According to the Convention, the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam makes its reservation to paragraph 1 of article 16 thereof.

Protocol van 14 oktober 2005

Partij	Onder- tekening	Ratificatie	Type*	In werking	Opzeg- ging	Buiten werking
Algerije		25-01-11	T	25-04-11
Xxxxxxxxx	00-00-00
Xxxxxxxxx	11-09-06	07-10-10	R	05-01-11
Cookeilanden		12-03-07	T	28-07-10
Denemarken	09-02-07
Dominicaanse Xxxxxxxxx, xx		00-00-00	X	00-00-00
Xxxxxxx	08-02-07	16-05-08	X	00-00-00
Xxxx-xxxxxxxx		21-05-08	T	28-07-10
Xxxxxxx	00-00-00
Xxxxxxxxx	14-02-06
Xxxxxxxxxxx	00-00-00
Xxxxxx	01-02-07
Xxxxxxx		00-00-00	X	00-00-00
Xxxxxxxxxxxxx		28-08-09	T	28-07-10
Marshalleilan- den, de		09-05-08	T	28-07-10
Nauru		29-04-10	T	28-07-10
Nederlanden, het Koninkrijk der – Nederland: – in Europa – Xxxxxxx – Xxxx Xxxxxxxxx – Xxxx – Xxxxx – Xxxxxxx – Sint Maarten	31-01-07	01-03-11 01-03-11 01-03-11 01-03-11 – – –	R R R R	30-05-11 30-05-11 30-05-11 30-05-11 – – –
Nieuw-Zeeland	24-01-07
Xxxxxxxxx	00-00-00
Xxxxxxxxxx	12-05-06	18-06-10	R	16-09-10

Partij	Onder- tekening	Ratificatie	Type*	In werking	Opzeg- ging	Buiten werking
Panama		24-02-11	T	25-05-11
Portugal	14-06-06
Saint Kitts en Nevis		29-03-07	T	28-07-10
Saint Vincent en de Grenadines		05-07-10	T	03-10-10
Servië		08-07-10	T	06-10-10
Spanje	12-02-07	16-04-08	R	28-07-10
Turkije	15-08-06	19-07-10	R	17-10-10
Vanuatu		00-00-00	X	00-00-00
Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx, het	23-01-07
Verenigde Xxxxxx xxx Xxxxxxx, xx	00-00-00
Xxxxxx	14-02-06
Zwitserland		15-10-08	T	28-07-10
* O=Ondertekening zonder voorbehoud of vereiste van ratificatie, R=Bekrachtiging, aanvaarding, goedkeuring of kennisgeving, T=Toetreding, VG=Voortgezette gebonden- heid, NB=Niet bekend

Verklaringen, voorbehouden en bezwaren

Letland, 16 november 2009

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 8bis, paragraph 15 of the Protocol, the Republic of Latvia notifies that the authority to receive and respond to requests for assistance is:

Naval Forces Coast Guard Service of the National Armed Forces of the

Republic of Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxx. 0x, Xxxx, XX-0000

Xxxxxx

Phone: x000 00000000

Fax:x000 00000000

E-mail: xxxx@xxxx.xx

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 8bis, paragraph 15 of the Protocol, the Republic of Latvia further notifies that the authorities to receive and

respond to requests for confirmation of nationality and for authorization to take appropriate measures within the scope of their competence are: Security Police

Xx. Xxxxxx Xxx. 00x, Xxxx, XX-0000

Xxxxxx

Phone: x000 00000000

Fax: x000 00000000

E-mail: xx@xx.xxx.xx Prosecutor General’s Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxx. 0

Xxxx, XX-0000

Xxxxxx

Phone: x000 00000000

Fax: x000 00000000

E-mail: xxxxxxxxx@xxx.xxx.xx

Nederlanden, het Koninkrijk der, 1 maart 2011

The Kingdom of the Netherlands declares that it will apply the provi- sions of article 3ter of the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Maritime Navigation, 2005, in accordance with the principles of its criminal law concerning family exemptions of liability.

Zwitserland, 15 oktober 0000

Xxxxxxxxxxx declares that article 2bis of the SUA Convention, as con- tained in the Protocol of 14 October 2005 must not be interpreted as excusing or rendering lawful any acts in other respects unlawful or as excluding the bringing of an action under other legislation.

G. INWERKINGTREDING

Zie Trb. 1992, 75, Trb. 1993, 29, Trb. 2005, 182 en Trb. 2006, 223.

Wat betreft het Koninkrijk der Nederlanden, geldt het Verdrag, dat vanaf 3 juni 1992 voor het Europese deel van Nederland en vanaf 15 december 2004 voor Aruba gold, vanaf 10 oktober 2010 eveneens voor het Caribische deel van Nederland.

De bepalingen van het Protocol van 2005 zijn ingevolge artikel 18, eerste lid, op 28 juli 2010 in werking getreden.

De bepalingen van het Protocol van 2005 zijn ingevolge artikel 18, tweede lid, op 30 mei 2011 voor het Koninkrijk der Nederlanden in wer- king getreden.

Wat betreft het Koninkrijk der Nederlanden, geldt het Protocol van 2005 voor Nederland (het Europese en het Caribische deel).

J. VERWIJZINGEN

Zie voor verwijzingen en andere verdragsgegevens Trb. 1989, 17,

Trb. 1992, 75, Trb. 1993, 29, Trb. 1996, 204, Trb. 2005, 182 en Trb. 2006,

223.

Verbanden

Titel : Protocol tot bestrijding van wederrechtelijke gedragin- gen gericht tegen de veiligheid van vaste platforms op het continentale plat;

Rome, 10 maart 1988

Laatste Trb. : Trb. 2011, 129

Overige verwijzingen

Titel : Handvest van de Verenigde Naties;

San Francisco, 26 juni 1945

Laatste Trb. : Trb. 2011, 57

Titel : Verdrag inzake de Internationale Maritieme Organisatie; Genève, 6 maart 1948

Laatste Trb. : Trb. 2008, 26

Titel : Internationaal Verdrag voor de beveiliging van mensen- levens op zee, 1974;

Londen, 1 november 1974

Laatste Trb. : Trb. 2011, 65

Titel : Verdrag van de Verenigde Naties inzake het recht van de zee;

Montego-Bay, 10 december 1982

Laatste Trb. : Trb. 2009, 77

Titel : Protocol tot bestrijding van wederrechtelijke daden van geweld op luchthavens voor de internationale burger- luchtvaart bij het Verdrag tot bestrijding van weder- rechtelijke gedragingen tegen de veiligheid van de bur- gerluchtvaart, gedaan te Montreal op 23 september 1971;

Montreal, 24 februari 1988

Laatste Trb. : Trb. 2011, 41

Titel : Verdrag inzake het merken van kneedspringstoffen ten behoeve van de opsporing ervan;

Montreal, 1 maart 1991

Laatste Trb. : Trb. 2011, 34

Titel : Verdrag inzake de bestrijding van terroristische bomaanslagen;

New York, 15 december 1997

Laatste Trb. : Trb. 2010, 158

Titel : Internationaal Verdrag ter bestrijding van de financie- ring van terrorisme;

New York, 9 december 1999

Laatste Trb. : Trb. 2010, 151

Titel : Internationaal Verdrag ter bestrijding van daden van nucleair terrorisme;

New York, 13 april 2005

Laatste Trb. : Trb. 2010, 232

Uitgegeven de zeventiende augustus 2011.

De Minister van Buitenlandse Zaken,

X. XXXXXXXXX

trb-2011-128 ISSN 0920 - 2218

’s-Gravenhage 2011