AUDITS OF OPERATIONS. 5.1 Identification of the authorities/bodies that carried out the audits of operations, including the Audit Authority. 5.2 Description of the sampling methodology applied and information as to whether the methodology is in accordance with the audit strategy. 5.3 Indication of the sampling parameters and other information for statistical or non-statistical sampling procedures, the underlying calculations for sample selection (in a format permitting an understanding of the basic steps taken, in accordance with the specific sampling method used) and explanation of the professional judgement applied. The information should include: materiality level, confidence level, sampling unit, expected error rate, sampling interval, standard deviation, population value, population size, sample size and information on stratification. 5.4 Reconciliation between the costs recognised declared to the Commission for the 12 months period and the population from which the random sample was drawn. Reconciling items include negative items where financial adjustments/corrections have been made, as well as differences between amounts declared in euro and amounts in IPA III beneficiary currency, where relevant. 5.5 Where there are negative items, confirmation that they have been treated as a separate population. Analysis of the principal results of the audits of these units, namely focusing on verifying whether the amounts correspond to the decisions to apply financial adjustments/ corrections (taken by the IPA III beneficiary or by the Commission) and reconcile with the amounts included in the accounts as withdrawn and recovered / to be recovered. 5.6 Where a non-statistical sampling method is used, specify the reasons for using the method, the percentage of sampling units/costs recognised covered by audits, the steps taken to ensure randomness of the sample bearing in mind that the sample has to be representative. In addition, define the steps taken to ensure a sufficient size of the sample enabling the Audit Authority to draw up a valid audit opinion. A total (projected) error rate is also calculated where non-statistical sampling method has been used. 5.7 Summary table (see Section 9), broken down where applicable by programme, indicating the costs recognised and payments made declared to the Commission, the costs recognised audited and the errors identified. Information relating to the random sample is distinguished from that related to other samples if applicable (e.g. risk-based complementary samples). 5.8 Analysis of the main findings of the audits of operations, describing:
Appears in 4 contracts
Samples: Оквирни Споразум О Финансијском Партнерству, Оквирни Споразум О Финансијском Партнерству, Framework Agreement