Difference. Any difference arising between the Parties as to the interpretation, application, operation or alleged violation of the Agreement, including any difference arising over the suspension or dismissal of an employee, and including the question as to whether a matter is arbitrable, shall be finally and conclusively resolved without stoppage of work in the following manner:
Difference. This is calculated by deducting the ‘Closing Inventory – Calculated’ total from the ‘Closing Inventory – Physical’ total reported on the Packaged Product Movement Summary.
Difference. This is calculated by deducting the ‘Closing Inventory - Calculated’ total from the ‘Closing Inventory - Physical’ total reported on the Packaged Product Movement Summary. LDB Shrinkage Allowance Calculation The shrinkage allowance takes into account an acceptable volume of Product that may be consumed or written-off in BC due to normal manufacturing and warehousing activities. By allowing this, a manufacturer does not have to fully document each instance of breakage/destruction which may occur. The rate depends on the annual production volume of the manufacturer. The current rate of the LDB shrinkage allowance is 0.50% of ‘Total Calculated Packaged Product Moved in BC’ for the annual production. Self-Assessment Calculation This portion of the Packaged Product Movement Summary report calculates the ‘Total Deductions Subject to LDB Xxxx-up’. If the amount is positive, you owe the LDB xxxx-up because your non- sale inventory deductions exceed the shrinkage allowance. The LDB will invoice you to recover the xxxx-up value based on the LDB Established Retail Price of the excess volume of the unaccounted movement of inventory. Other With the submission of your Packaged Product Movement Summary report, you must provide the LDB a listing of all the Warehouses located in British Columbia where you stored any of your Product as at March 31.
Difference. All matters, questions, disputes, differences or claims arising between the Parties as to the effect, interpretation or application of this Agreement or as to their rights, duties or liabilities hereunder, or as to any act, matter or thing arising out of consequent to, or in connection with this Agreement (hereinafter called the Difference’) will be resolved amicably through negotiations. Such negotiations will commence within a period of seven (7) working days of the issue of notice in writing by either party calling for the same (hereinafter called ‘the Notice’).
Difference. This declaration shall be reviewed by an independent auditing firm and attached to the auditor’s report prepared by the said firm. The declaration shall only focus on recyclable containers that have a deposit or should have a deposit according to the Agreement relating to the Deposit, Recovery and Recycling of Non-Refillable Soft Drink Containers effective at the date of the Declaration SCHEDULE F Registration Form Agreement entered into and concluded pursuant to the Act respecting the sale and distribution of beer and soft drinks in non-returnable containers Name or Corporate Name of Applicant: Legal Status: ❒ Legal person or Partnership1 ❒ Sole Ownership Quebec Business Number2: Date of Incorporation: Shareholders or Partners: Directors: 1 If the Applicant is a legal person or a partnership, the Registrant must annex a certified resolution of the directors or of the partners, as the case may be, authorizing the signatory to sign this registration form. 2 Or a copy of the Company’s Incorporation Deed. Residential Address or Principal Place of Business: Mailing Address (if different): List of principal activities of the Applicant (as a percentage of total business volume): The Applicant has a Soft Drink distribution and recovery network for Softs Drink using vehicles principally dedicated for this purpose (check): No ❒ Yes ❒ If Yes, in the following areas: Environment and the Fight against climate change an application to obtain a permit pursuant to the Act respecting the sale and distribution of beer and soft drinks in non-returnable containers.
Difference. The next phase of the Accord, Xxxx III to Xxxx V from 1987 until 1990 I call the phase of difference.9 The union movement was smarting, but remained supportive of the Accord at the peak level. The two-tier award system was introduced by the decision the created the Accord Xxxx III. The basic premise behind the policies was that the government committed itself to substantial cuts in personal income tax and increases in family welfare in return for productivity based wage restraint (Xxxxxxxx, 1994:208). Xxxxx Xxxxxx (1988:59) quotes the ACTU President Xxxxx Xxxxx as stating in 1986 that “the Accord carries with it an aura of consensus and agreement. Properly promoted, I think that allows people to become aware of the good things that unions are doing”. Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx defended the Accord in an interview stating that the Accords had created gains in terms of the “protection of, and even the extension of, the living standards of the lowest paid” (Aarons & Xxxxxx, 1988/9:22). Between the years of 1988 and 1991, the structural efficiency principle of the Arbitration Commission required all unions (and employers) to commit to industry level negotiations to restructure their awards (Xxxxxx 1995:227). The deals were still done in the context of the centralised wage fixing system. So, however distasteful to those at the receiving end of the delays in improving the real standard of living, they still adhered to the principles of corporatism as labourism, as per the Xxxxxxxxx argument. This did not deter the growing ranks of critics, who on social democratic grounds had added their voices to the critics in the hard left. Most importantly, the much heralded industry policy was not in place in what has been termed the sunrise industries of telecommunications, and aerospace (Xxxx, 1996:3). In an effort to achieve industry policy through other means, the Accord was re-drafted four times with no major policy shifts but with the added focus of award restructuring and training reform (Xxxx 1996:3). Australia Reconstructed, adopted as ACTU policy at the 1987 biennial congress was being put into practice, and also renewed concern with industry development. This policy stated that Australian unions should continue to develop and formulate policy under the umbrella of the ACTU (ACTU, 1987: 189). However, relations between the ACTU and the government were strained, and to make the situation worse, the government had publicly supported a wage raise of 11% for parliamentarians (X...
Difference. This is calculated by deducting the ‘Closing Inventory – Calculated’ total from the ‘Closing Inventory – Physical’ total reported on the Packaged Product Movement Summary. LDB Shrinkage Allowance Calculation The shrinkage allowance takes into account an acceptable volume of Product that may be consumed or written-off in BC due to normal manufacturing and warehousing activities. By allowing this, a manufacturer does not have to fully document each instance of breakage/destruction which may occur. The rate depends on the annual production volume of the manufacturer. The current rate of the LDB shrinkage allowance is 1.75% of ‘Total Calculated Packaged Product Moved in BC’ for the annual production of packaged wine-other products, and 0.50% for packaged cider and refreshment beverage products' annual production. Self-Assessment Calculation This portion of the Packaged Product Movement Summary calculates the Total Deductions Subject to LDB Xxxx-up. If the amount is positive, you owe the LDB xxxx-up because your non- sale inventory deductions exceed the LDB shrinkage allowance. The LDB will invoice you to recover the xxxx-up value based on the LDB Established Retail Price of the excess volume of the unaccounted movement of inventory. Other With the submission of your Packaged Product Movement Summary report, you must provide the LDB a listing of all the Warehouses located in British Columbia where you stored any of your Product as at March 31.
Difference. This declaration shall be reviewed by an independent auditing firm and attached to the auditor’s report prepared by the said firm. The declaration shall only focus on recyclable containers that have a deposit or should have a deposit according to the Agreement relating to the Deposit, Recovery and Recycling of Non-Refillable Soft Drink Containers effective at the date of the Declaration. SCHEDULE F Registration Form Agreement entered into and concluded pursuant to the Act respecting the sale and distribution of beer and soft drinks in non-returnable containers Name or Corporate Name of Applicant: Legal Status: Legal person or Partnership1 Sole Ownership Quebec Business Number2: Date of Incorporation:
Difference. Any difference arising between the parties as to the interpretation, application, operation or alleged violation of this agreement, including any differences over the suspension or dismissal of an employee, and including the question as to whether the matter is arbitrable, shall be finally and conclusively resolved without stoppage of work in the following manner: STAGE 1 The Shop Xxxxxxx with the employee(s) shall first discuss the matter with the xxxxxxx/Immediate Supervisor or their designate and shall try and resolve the matter within five (5) working days. Where the matter is not resolved in Stage 1, then:
Difference. This is calculated by deducting the ‘Closing Inventory – Calculated’ total from the ‘Closing Inventory – Physical’ total reported on the Product Movement Summary. LDB Shrinkage Allowance Calculation The shrinkage allowance takes into account an acceptable volume of packaged beverage alcohol that may be consumed or written-off in BC due to normal manufacturing and warehousing activities. By allowing this, a manufacturer does not have to fully document each instance of breakage/destruction which may occur. The rate depends on the annual production volume of the manufacturer. The current rate of the LDB shrinkage allowance is 1.75% of Total Calculated Product Moved in BC for the annual production of wine-other products and 0.50% for cider and cooler products' annual production. Self-Assessment Calculation This portion of the Product Movement Summary calculates the Total Deductions Subject to LDB Xxxx-up. If the amount is positive, you owe the LDB xxxx-up because your non-sale inventory deductions exceed the LDB shrinkage allowance. The LDB will invoice you to recover the xxxx-up value based on the LDB Established Retail Price of the excess volume of the unaccounted movement of inventory.
