July 2017. This is not intended as an exhaustive reference and in some cases consultation with a qualified health and safety professional is recommended so that relevant duties are clearly understood and suitably considered. High standards of health and safety applied by users of the facilities should be maintained at all times and every effort must be made by all parties to ensure that those standards provide a safe and healthy environment for all involved with exhibitions and events at the venues. Our objective is to ensure that all persons attending the facility have a safe and enjoyable experience. To achieve this, we will require the full co-operation of everyone involved in the exhibition process. Health and safety is everyone’s concern so please be diligent and enjoy your visit to the Dubai World Trade Centre. ‘The Organiser’, referenced in this document, represents the organiser’s manual issued by the Dubai World Trade Centre.
July 2017. “We also get to eat salmon” – New fishing restrictions supported by people upstream the River Teno, xxxxx://xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx/en/borders/2017/07/we-also-get- eat-salmon-new-fishing-restrictions-supported-people-upstream-river-teno.
July 2017. “We also get to eat salmon” – New fishing restrictions supported by people upstream the River Teno. Available at: xxxxx://xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx/en/bord ers/2017/07/we-also-get-eat-salmon- new-fishing-restrictions-supported- people-upstream-river-teno (Viewed 7.11.2018). The Local. 21 July 2017. Northern Norwegian islands in moratorium over fishing rights. Available at: xxxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxx.xx/20170721/north ern-norwegian-islands-in-moratorium- over-fishing-rights (Viewed 15.11.2018).
July 2017. Xx. Xxx Chi Xxx, Xxxxxx has confirmed that he has no disagreement with the Board and there is no matter which needs to be brought to the attention of the Shareholders or the Stock Exchange in respect of his resignation as the agent for accepting service of process and notices on behalf of the Company.
July 2017. If advertiser/sponsor does not meet the above-published deadlines, SPE cannot guarantee advertising space and reserves the right to invoke penalties for late submissions.
July 2017. A completed registration form or a written indication by email of your or your organization’s intention to participate is sufficient. If your organization has not been represented before, please include some information on the relevance to the Agreement. UNEP/CMS/ASCOBANS Secretariat, UN Campus, Xxxxx xxx Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx 0, 00000 Xxxx, Xxxxxxx Tel. +00 000 000 0000 - - E-Mail: xxxxxxxx.xxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxx.xxx - xxx.xxxxxxxx.xxx Parties will be requested to inform the Secretariat of any objections by 5 August 2017. Unless objections are received from more than one third of the Parties (i.e. four objections), the applicant will be admitted as a non-voting observer. The Secretariat will promptly notify all applicants of the final decision.
July 2017. The European Union (EU) and Japan last week agreed in principle to ratify a free trade agreement (FTA) that is seen as a pointed challenge to the Xxxxx administration’s “America First” nationalism and threats of trade war. Despite being hyped as a victory for free trade over protectionism, the FTA signals the accelerating division of the world into competing trade blocs and the growing danger of trade conflict and war. The FTA, the result of four years of intense secret negotiations, must now be ratified by each member state of the EU and the Japanese parliament—a complicated process without guaranteed success. Nevertheless, the trade deal covers 640 million people, 30 percent of the world’s gross domestic product and 40 percent of global trade by volume. It is the largest of its kind ever negotiated. If ratified, it would be the biggest trading bloc in the world, ahead of the US-led North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). Economic analysts have focused on the FTA’s reduction of tariffs on automobiles and dairy products. Several media outlets labelled it the “cars and cheeses deal.” Under its terms, the EU will lower restrictions on Japanese automakers in European markets, while Japan will reciprocate by eliminating its traditionally high tariffs on wine and dairy imports over the next 10-15 years. The agreement has been portrayed as a boon for European agriculture, which, due to increased competition and reduced subsidies, has been losing jobs and profits, particularly in the dairy industry. Similarly in Japan, the deal has been touted as a major boost for automakers. This was a key factor in Japan agreeing to negotiations in 2013, following the ratification of a similar agreement between the EU and South Korea in 2012. Despite these supposed benefits, progress in talks was slow and mired in sharp disagreements until the election of Xxxxxx Xxxxx. His junking of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), involving the US, Japan and 10 other nations, was a significant blow to Japanese Prime Minister Xxxxxx Xxx, who hoped the bloc would help revive the stagnant Japanese economy. As for the EU, the FTA deal with Japan is part of efforts to shift its economic and strategic dependence away from the US—a drive led by Germany, which has come under attack by Xxxxx for supposedly unfair trade practices. In thinly-veiled references to Xxxxx, the European Commission and Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs both spoke of the need to reach an agreement as soon as possib...
July 2017. Xxxxxx Xxx JC: 1 The plaintiff, Alacran Design Pte Ltd (“Alacran”), claimed against the defendant, Broadley Construction Pte Ltd (“Broadley”), a sum of $423,407.34 for equipment supplied to Broadley in the construction of a residential development project (“the Project”), of which Xxxxxxxx was a sub-contractor. The main contractor of the Project was Singbuild Pte Ltd (“Singbuild”). It is undisputed that Xxxxxxxx owed that sum to Alacran. The dispute centres on whether a letter of undertaking discharged Broadley from liability for payment of the sum on the basis that Singbuild was authorised to pay the sum to Alacran on Xxxxxxxx’x behalf.
July 2017. As of 20 June 2017, you and the cotenant (if any) has not yet terminated the contract and cleared the contents of your Safe Deposit Box. The Bank urges you to urgently visit Charoenkrung Branch to terminate the Safe Deposit Box Rental Agreement, clear the contents and return the keys to the Bank no later than 7 August 2017. This letter is to remind you that failure to terminate the Safe Deposit Rental Agreement and clear the contents of Safe Deposit Box within 7 August 2017, the Bank will terminate the Safe Deposit Rental Agreement with effect on such date. Also, the Bank reserves the right to open the Safe Deposit Box immediately and process as stipulated in the agreement and in accordance with the Bank’s procedures. Once again, we would like to thank you for your trust in banking with us and would like to offer our apologies in advance should you experience any inconvenience during this business transfer process. Should you have any queries, please contact Charoenkrung Branch at telephone no. 00-0000000-00, 00-0000000 Exit 7111, 7131, 7230 or 082-2247002, 082-2247277, 082-2247067, 082-2247284 Yours Sincerely Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Senior Branch Manager, Charoenkrung Branch
July 2017. The DRP requested to see the scheme again. Considered key elements of the Masterplan need to be tied down. Details of guidelines and degree of flexibility in the parameters also need to be progressed. • Requested further development of the technical studies (wind and sunlight issues) plus view studies in a Townscape analysis. • Welcomed the central space. Should ensure that outward facing facades and elevations do not present “backs“ to the wider urban context. • Felt the mid-rise buildings were too uniform. Generally, too tall, and bulky, when compared to some of the large footprint buildings surrounding the site. • Would prefer larger breaks and greater variation between the blocks in the development zones. • Ask to explore different ways the tops of the blocks could be articulated. Seek interest to the skyline silhouette. Variation in height between the west and eastern side of the space. • Not convinced at this stage about the proposed repositioning of the tower element. Would add bulk and massing to the south of the site. Lose the gateway narrative of the previous masterplan proposal (dialogue created with the tower under construction on the northern side of Westway). • Concerned about sense of openness at ground floor level regardless of the size of building. Desire to stimulate and drive the footfall through to connect to the northern site. • Residential element tucked away in the south-eastern corner. Reassurances requested regarding quality of amenity to these units given the proximity of the tower element and the West Cross Route. • Positive about the proposed servicing strategy and supported segregation of vehicular and pedestrian movements. Concern that the route to the tunnel may involve greater land take than the currently shown, how the provision is tied into the phasing and what trigger the ability to deliver it. • Would like to see further development of the public realm and landscaping especially at the arrival space. Public realm needs to react to the buildings and vice-versa, but limited information available at this stage. The applicants are encouraged to develop features in the space to draw people through and look at the possibility of a strong public offer – a cultural / leisure space that could animate the space and ensure vitality.
