Reliability Network Upgrades Sample Clauses

Reliability Network Upgrades. The Interconnection Customer shall be entitled to a repayment of the amount the Interconnection Customer paid to the Distribution Provider for Reliability Network Upgrades as set forth in Appendix A and G, up to a maximum of $60,000 per MW of Generating Facility capacity. For purposes of this determination, the Generating Facility capacity will be based on the capacity of the Interconnection Customer’s Generating Facility at the time it achieves Commercial Operation. However, to the extent that such repayment does not cover all of the costs of Interconnection Customer’s Reliability Network Upgrades, the Interconnection Customer may receive Congestion Revenue Rights (as such term is defined in the ISO Tariff) from the ISO in accordance with the ISO Tariff for that portion of its Reliability Network Upgrades that are not covered by cash repayment.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (14)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Reliability Network Upgrades. The Interconnection Customer shall be responsible for funding its share of the costs of the Reliability Network Upgrades up to the maximum cost responsibility limit established for the Interconnection Customer in accordance with Section 4.6 of the GIP for such facilities. The costs set forth in Appendices A and G are estimates only. The Interconnection Customer shall be responsible for its share of the actual costs of Reliability Network Upgrades up to its maximum cost responsibility limit. The Interconnection Customer may be entitled to repayment of all or a portion of the costs it funded for Reliability Network Upgrades in accordance with Article 11.4.1.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (14)
Reliability Network Upgrades. The additions, modifications, and upgrades to the Transmission System at or beyond the Point of Interconnection, identified in the interconnection studies, as identified in Attachment 6, necessary to interconnect the Small Generating Facility safely and reliably to the Distribution System, which would not have been necessary but for the interconnection of the Small Generating Facility, including additions, modifications, and upgrades necessary to remedy short circuit or stability problems resulting from the interconnection of the Small Generating Facility to the Distribution System. The Reliability Network Upgrades also include, consistent with Applicable Reliability Standards and Applicable Reliability Council practice, the Distribution Provider’s facilities necessary to mitigate any adverse impact the Small Generating Facility’s interconnection may have on a path’s Applicable Reliability Council rating. The Reliability Network Upgrades do not include any Delivery Network Upgrades.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (8)
Reliability Network Upgrades. The Reliability Network Upgrades identified for Project1 are listed in Table A.2 and for Project2 in Table A.3. Table A.2: Reliability Network Upgrades, Estimated Costs, and Estimated Time to Construct for Project1 Type of Upgrade Upgrade Cost Allocation Factor Estimated Cost x 1,000 Escalated (Note 1) Estimated Time to Construct (Note 2) Reliability Network Upgrades To Physically Interconnect Expand the fenced area north at Melrose Substation to accommodate gen- tie connection • Extend the substation pad and fence 25 feet north to allow for required working clearances • Grade area north of the Melrose Substation • Install new fence around extended portion of the substation pad 100% $286 6 months Reliability Network Upgrades (Note 3) Participate in the modified proposed RAS to protect TL23006/23010/2300 2 San Xxxx Rey – San Xxxxxx 230kV lines (Note 6) SDG&E protection and communication equipment for substation(s)/switchyard(s) (Note 5) 11% $22 6 months Protection and communication equipment to interface between SDG&E and the Project (Note 4) 100% $250 6 months Total $558 Total adjusted based on the maximum cost responsibility $253.7
Sample 1
Reliability Network Upgrades. The Distribution Provider shall:
Sample 1
Reliability Network Upgrades. None identified as part of the Phase II Study.
Sample 1
Reliability Network Upgrades i. New Moorpark RAS – monitoring infrastructure.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Reliability Network Upgrades. None 2 Not subject to ITCC (Income Tax Component of Contribution). ITCC is exempt for wholesale generators that meet the IRS Safe Harbor Provisions. PG&E currently does not require the Interconnection Customer to provide security to cover the potential tax liability on the Interconnection Facilities, Distribution Upgrades, and Network Upgrades per the IRS Safe Harbor Provisions (IRS Notice 88-129). PG&E reserves the right to require, on a nondiscriminatory basis, the Interconnection Customer to provide such security, in a form reasonably acceptable to PG&E as indicated in Article 11 of the SGIA, an amount up to the cost consequences of any current tax liability. Upon request and within sixty (60) Calendar Days’ notice, the Interconnection Customer shall provide PG&E such ITCC security or ITCC payment in the event that Safe Harbor Provisions have not been met, in a form reasonably acceptable to PG&E.
Sample 1

Related to Reliability Network Upgrades

  • Network Upgrades The Transmission Owner shall design, procure, construct, install, and own the Network Upgrades described in Attachment 6 of this Agreement. If the Transmission Owner and the Interconnection Customer agree, the Interconnection Customer may construct Network Upgrades that are located on land owned by the Interconnection Customer. Unless the Transmission Owner elects to pay for Network Upgrades, the actual cost of the Network Upgrades, including overheads, shall be borne initially by the Interconnection Customer.

  • System Upgrades The Connecting Transmission Owner shall procure, construct, install, and own the System Upgrade Facilities and System Deliverability Upgrades described in Attachment 6 of this Agreement. To the extent that design work is necessary in addition to that already accomplished in the Class Year Interconnection Facilities Study for the Interconnection Customer, the Connecting Transmission Owner shall perform or cause to be performed such work. If all the Parties agree, the Interconnection Customer may construct System Upgrade Facilities and System Deliverability Upgrades.

  • Network Connectivity Farmington Area Public Schools makes no guarantee that their network will be up and running 100% of the time. In the rare case that the network is down, the District will not be responsible for lost or missing data. Attribution 4*

  • Network Resource Interconnection Service (check if selected)

  • Network Interconnection Architecture Each Party will plan, design, construct and maintain the facilities within their respective systems as are necessary and proper for the provision of traffic covered by this Agreement. These facilities include but are not limited to, a sufficient number of trunks to the point of interconnection with the tandem company, and sufficient interoffice and interexchange facilities and trunks between its own central offices to adequately handle traffic between all central offices within the service areas at P.01 grade of service or better. The provisioning and engineering of such services and facilities will comply with generally accepted industry methods and practices, and will observe the rules and regulations of the lawfully established tariffs applicable to the services provided.

  • Network Congestion Reduced Speed for Routing or Answering 911 Dialing Calls. There may be a greater possibility of network congestion and/or reduced speed in the routing of a 911 Dialing call made utilizing the Service as compared to traditional 911 dialing over traditional public telephone networks.

  • Connectivity User is solely responsible for providing and maintaining all necessary electronic communications with Exchange, including, wiring, computer hardware, software, communication line access, and networking devices.

  • Service Specification The Parties have agreed upon the scope and specification of the Services provided under this Service Agreement in the Service Specification.

  • Service Levels Annex 1 to this Part A of this Call Off Schedule sets out the Service Levels the performance of which the Parties have agreed to measure. The Supplier shall monitor its performance of this Call Off Contract by reference to the relevant performance criteria for achieving the Service Levels shown in Annex 1 to this Part A of this Call Off Schedule (the Service Level Performance Criteria) and shall send the Customer a Performance Monitoring Report detailing the level of service which was achieved in accordance with the provisions of Part B (Performance Monitoring) of this Call Off Schedule. The Supplier shall, at all times, provide the Services in such a manner that the Service Levels Performance Measures are achieved. If the level of performance of the Supplier of any element of the provision by it of the Services during the Call Off Contract Period: is likely to or fails to meet any Service Level Performance Measure or is likely to cause or causes a Critical Service Failure to occur, the Supplier shall immediately notify the Customer in writing and the Customer, in its absolute discretion and without prejudice to any other of its rights howsoever arising including under Clause 12 of this Call Off Contract (Service Levels and Service Credits), may: require the Supplier to immediately take all remedial action that is reasonable to mitigate the impact on the Customer and to rectify or prevent a Service Level Failure or Critical Service Level Failure from taking place or recurring; and if the action taken under paragraph (a) above has not already prevented or remedied the Service Level Failure or Critical Service Level Failure, the Customer shall be entitled to instruct the Supplier to comply with the Rectification Plan Process; or if a Service Level Failure has occurred, deduct from the Call Off Contract Charges the applicable Service Level Credits payable by the Supplier to the Customer in accordance with the calculation formula set out in Annex 1 of this Part A of this Call Off Schedule; or if a Critical Service Level Failure has occurred, exercise its right to Compensation for Critical Service Level Failure in accordance with Clause 13 of this Call Off Contract (Critical Service Level Failure) (including subject, for the avoidance of doubt, the proviso in Clause 13.1.2 of this Call Off Contract in relation to Material Breach). Approval and implementation by the Customer of any Rectification Plan shall not relieve the Supplier of any continuing responsibility to achieve the Service Levels, or remedy any failure to do so, and no estoppels or waiver shall arise from any such Approval and/or implementation by the Customer. SERVICE CREDITS Annex 1 to this Part A of this Call Off Schedule sets out the formula used to calculate a Service Credit payable to the Customer as a result of a Service Level Failure in a given service period which, for the purpose of this Call Off Schedule, shall be a recurrent period of [one Month] during the Call Off Contract Period (the Service Period).

  • Service Level Expectations Without limiting any other requirements of the Agreement, the Service Provider shall meet or exceed the following standards, policies, and guidelines:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.