Termination for Patent Challenge Sample Clauses

Termination for Patent Challenge. Either Party shall have the right to terminate this Agreement solely on a Licensed Product-by-Licensed Product basis upon written notice if the other Party or any of its Affiliates challenges the validity, scope or enforceability of or otherwise opposes any Patent (i) included in the Vividion Intellectual Property and that is licensed to Celgene under this Agreement in any action or proceeding, or (ii) included in the Celgene Patents or Celgene License Collaboration Patents under this Agreement in any action or proceeding (subject to the exceptions described in this Section 14.3(d), a “Challenge”) (other than as may be necessary or reasonably required to assert a defense, cross-claim or a counter-claim in an action or proceeding asserted by either Party or any of its Affiliates or Licensee Partners against the other Party or any of its Affiliates or to respond to a court request or order or administrative law, request or order), it being understood and agreed that either Party’s right to terminate this Agreement under this Section 14.3(d) shall not apply to any actions undertaken by an Affiliate of the other Party (the “Challenging Party”) that first becomes such an Affiliate as a result of a Change of Control involving the Challenging Party, where such new Affiliate was undertaking any of the activities described in the foregoing clause prior to such Change of Control; provided that, a Party’s right to terminate this Agreement under this Section 14.3(d) shall apply to actions undertaken by such new Affiliate if the Challenging Party is the acquiror in such Change of Control and such new Affiliate does not terminate or otherwise cease participating in such action, proceeding, challenge or opposition within thirty (30) days after the effective date of such Change of Control. If a Licensee Partner of Celgene challenges the validity, scope or enforceability of or otherwise opposes any Patent included in any of the intellectual property described in this Section 14.3(d) under which such Licensee Partner is sublicensed in any action or proceeding, then Celgene shall, upon written notice from Vividion, terminate such sublicense. For the avoidance of doubt, an action by a Party or any of its Affiliates (collectively the “Pursuing Party”) in accordance with this Agreement or the Master Agreement to amend claims within a pending patent application of the other Party during the course of the Pursuing Party’s Prosecution of such pending patent application or in defen...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Termination for Patent Challenge. If, during the Term, AbbVie or any of its Affiliates or Sublicensees of Morphic Patents under this Agreement: (a) [***]; or (b) [***] (each of (a) and (b), a “Patent Challenge”), then except as otherwise set forth in this Section 12.2.5, Morphic shall have the right to terminate this Agreement upon at least [***] prior written notice to AbbVie; provided, that Morphic shall not have the right to terminate this Agreement if within [***] after receipt of such written notice from Morphic, (i) AbbVie or its Affiliate, as applicable, rescinds any and all of such Patent Challenge (or in the case of ex-parte proceedings, multi-party proceedings, or other Patent Challenges that AbbVie or such Affiliate does not have the power to unilaterally withdraw or cause to be withdrawn, AbbVie and its Affiliate, as applicable, knowingly ceases providing any support or assistance to any Person with respect to such Patent Challenge and, to the extent AbbVie or any of its Affiliates is a party to such Patent Challenge, it withdraws from such Patent Challenge) and provided, that neither AbbVie nor any AbbVie Affiliate thereafter continues such Patent Challenge or, knowingly, the provision of any direction, support or assistance to any Person in respect of the same or (ii) if such Patent Challenge is brought by a Sublicensee, AbbVie or its Affiliate terminates such Sublicensee’s sublicense or other right or authorization to the relevant Patent and ceases providing any direction, support or assistance to such Sublicensee related to such Patent Challenge, unless such termination is prohibited under Applicable Law. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Morphic shall not have the right to terminate this Agreement pursuant to this Section 12.2.5 if AbbVie or its Affiliate or Sublicensee takes any action described in clause (a) or (b) of the foregoing definition of Patent Challenge (x) in a proceeding involving a Morphic Patent where AbbVie, an Affiliate or Sublicensee has been compelled to participate in the proceeding by a court, patent office, or Third Party (other than any Sublicensee) or (y) that is necessary or reasonably required to assert a cross-claim or a counterclaim or to respond to a court request or order or administrative law request or order, including asserting any defense or counterclaim in, or otherwise responding to, an action for infringement of intellectual property asserted, filed, or threatened to be filed, against AbbVie or its Affiliate or Sublicensee by Morphic or an...
Termination for Patent Challenge. Nanobiotix shall have the right to terminate this Agreement with immediate effect by giving written notice to Lian if Lian or its Affiliates or Sublicensees bring or join any challenge to the validity or enforceability of any Nanobiotix Patent (a “Patent Challenge”) and does not withdraw such Patent Challenge within [***] days of written notice from Nanobiotix; provided that (i) a Patent Challenge does not include Lian’s or its Affiliates’ or its Sublicensees (A) responding to compulsory discovery, subpoenas or other requests for information in a judicial or arbitration proceeding or (B) complying with any Applicable Law or a court order; and (ii) the foregoing right of termination shall not apply with respect to any Patent Challenge that (I) is first made by Lian or any of its Affiliates or Sublicensees in defense of a claim of patent infringement brought by Nanobiotix under the applicable Patents or any Patent Challenge, (II) was brought by an acquirer of Lian prior to the effective date of such Change of Control, or (III) is brought by any non-Affiliate Sublicensee if Lian (1) causes such Patent Challenge to be terminated or dismissed (or in the case of ex-parte proceedings, multi-party proceedings, or other Patent Challenges in which the challenging party does not have the power to unilaterally cause the Patent Challenge to be withdrawn, causes such Sublicensee to withdraw as a party from such Patent Challenge and to cease actively assisting any other party to such Patent Challenge), or (2) terminates such Sublicensee’s sublicense to the Patents being challenged by the Sublicensee, in each case, within [***] days after Nanobiotix’s notice to Lian under this Section 14.2(d).
Termination for Patent Challenge. Prothena shall have the right to terminate this Agreement upon written notice if Celgene or any Affiliate of Celgene challenges the validity, scope or enforceability of or otherwise opposes any Patent included in the Prothena IP that is licensed to Celgene under this Agreement, in each case through a formal proceeding (other than as may be necessary or reasonably required to assert a cross-claim or a counter-claim or to respond to a court request or order or administrative law, request or order). If a Sublicensee of Celgene with respect to any Prothena IP challenges the validity, scope or enforceability of or otherwise opposes any Patent included in such Prothena IP under which such Sublicensee is sublicensed in each case through a formal proceeding (other than as may be necessary or reasonably required to assert a cross-claim or a counter-claim or to respond to a court request or order or administrative law, request or order), then Celgene shall, upon written notice from Prothena, terminate such sublicense.
Termination for Patent Challenge. Except to the extent the following is unenforceable under the laws of a particular jurisdiction, Licensor may terminate this Agreement in its entirety upon written notice to Licensee if Licensee or its Affiliates or sublicensees, individually or in association with any other person or entity, commences a legal action challenging the validity, enforceability or scope of any Licensed Patent anywhere in the world.
Termination for Patent Challenge. FibroGen may terminate this Agreement in its entirety immediately upon written notice to AstraZeneca if AstraZeneca or its Affiliates or Sublicensees (directly or indirectly, individually or in association with any other person or entity) challenges the validity, enforceability or scope of any FibroGen Patent in the Territory and such challenge is not permanently withdrawn within ninety (90) days.
Termination for Patent Challenge. Checkpoint will be permitted to terminate this Agreement by written notice effective upon receipt if TGTX or its Affiliates or its Sublicensees, directly or indirectly through assistance granted to a Third Party, commence any interference or opposition proceeding, challenge in a legal or administrative proceeding the validity or enforceability of, or oppose in a legal or administrative proceeding any extension of or the grant of a supplementary protection certificate with respect to, any Licensor Patents (a “Patent Challenge”). TGTX will include provisions in all agreements granting Sublicenses of TGTX’s rights hereunder (other than agreements with manufacturers, services providers, distributors and other agents) providing that if the Sublicensee or its Affiliates undertake a Patent Challenge with respect to any Licensor Patents under which the Sublicensee is Sublicensed, TGTX will be permitted to terminate such Sublicense agreement. If a Sublicensee of TGTX (or an Affiliate of such Sublicensee) undertakes a Patent Challenge of any such Licensor Patent Rights under which such Sublicensee is sublicensed, then TGTX upon receipt of notice from Checkpoint of such Patent Challenge will terminate the applicable Sublicense agreement. If TGTX fails to so terminate such Sublicense agreement, Checkpoint may terminate TGTX’s right to Sublicense in the country(ies) covered by such Sublicense agreement and any Sublicenses previously granted in such country(ies) shall automatically terminate. In connection with such Sublicense termination, TGTX shall cooperate with Checkpoint’s reasonable requests to cause such a terminated Sublicensee to discontinue activities with respect to the Licensed Product in such country(ies).
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Termination for Patent Challenge. If either Party or any of its Affiliates or Sublicensees: (a) commences or otherwise voluntarily determines to participate in any action or proceeding (including any patent opposition or re-examination proceeding), challenging or denying the validity of any of the other Party’s Patents or Joint Patents licensed hereunder or any claim thereof, or (b) actively assists any other Person in bringing or prosecuting any action or proceeding (including any patent opposition or re-examination proceeding) challenging or denying the validity of any of such Patents or any claim thereof, the non-challenging Party shall *** = Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment. An unredacted version of this exhibit has been filed separately with the Commission. have the right to terminate this Agreement with respect to the Option or Licensed Program to which such Patents are subject upon *** written notice to the other Party. Any such termination shall only become effective if the challenging Party or its Affiliate or Sublicensee, as applicable, has not withdrawn such action before the end of the above notice period.
Termination for Patent Challenge. If a Party (the “Challenging Party”) (a) commences or actively and voluntarily participates in any action or proceeding (including any Patent opposition or re-examination proceeding), or otherwise asserts any claim, challenging or denying the validity or enforceability of any claim of any Patent that is licensed to the Challenging Party under this Agreement or (b) actively and voluntarily assists any other Person in bringing or prosecuting any action or proceeding (including any Patent opposition or re-examination proceeding) challenging or denying the validity or enforceability of any claim of any Patent that is licensed to the Challenging Party under this Agreement by the other Party (the “Non-Challenging Party”) (each of (a) and (b), a “Patent Challenge”), then, to the extent permitted by Applicable Law, the Non-Challenging Party shall have the right, in its sole discretion, to give notice to the Challenging Party that the Non-Challenging Party may terminate the license(s) granted under such Patent to the Challenging Party [***] days following such notice, and, unless the Challenging Party withdraws or causes to be withdrawn all such challenge(s), or in the case of ex-parte proceedings, multi-party proceedings, or other Patent Challenges that the Challenging Party does not have the power to unilaterally withdraw or cause to be withdrawn, the Challenging Party ceases assisting any other party to such Patent Challenge and, to the extent the Challenging Party is a party to such Patent Challenge, it withdraws from such Patent Challenge within such [***]-day period, the Non-Challenging Party shall have the right to deem the Challenging Party to have exercised an Opt-Out with respect to any Shared Product(s) Covered by a Patent that is the subject of such Patent Challenge, by providing written notice thereof to the Challenging Party, in which case the provisions of Section 17.3 shall apply; provided, however, [***]. The foregoing right of the Non-Challenging Party shall not apply with respect to any Patent Challenge where the Patent Challenge is made in defense of an assertion of the relevant Patent that is first brought by the Non-Challenging Party against the Challenging Party. For the avoidance of doubt, any participation by the Challenging Party or its employees in any claim, challenge or proceeding in response to a subpoena or as required under a pre-existing agreement between the Challenging Party’s employee(s) or consultant(s) and their prior employer(...
Termination for Patent Challenge. Harvard may terminate this Agreement immediately, as to Type I or Type II Licensed Products or both, upon written notice to Licensee if Licensee commences an action in which it challenges the validity, enforceability or scope of any of the Patent Rights. All rights and licenses granted herein shall survive such termination as to the Licensed Product that is not terminated.
Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.