Common use of 280G Cutback Clause in Contracts

280G Cutback. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Agreement to the contrary, in the event that the Company determines in good faith that any payment or benefit received or to be received by Executive pursuant to this Agreement, or otherwise (all such payments and benefits, including, without limitation, salary and bonus payments, being hereinafter called the “Total Payments”) would be subject to the excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), by reason of being considered “contingent on a change in ownership or control” of the Company within the meaning of Section 280G of the Code, then such Total Payments shall be reduced to the extent necessary so that the Total Payments will be less than three times Executive’s “base amount” (as defined in Section 280G(b)(3) of the Code), unless the amount of such reduction would equal or exceed 110% of the excise taxes that would be imposed by Section 4999 of the Code on such payments and benefits. The reduction of the Total Payments shall apply as follows, unless otherwise agreed and such agreement is in compliance with Section 409A of the Code: (i) first, any cash severance payments due under the Agreement shall be reduced, with the last such payment due first forfeited and reduced, and sequentially thereafter working from the next last payment, and (ii) second, any acceleration of vesting of any equity shall be deferred with the tranche that would vest last (without any such acceleration) first deferred.

Appears in 4 contracts

Samples: Employment Agreement (Goodman Distribution, Inc.), Employment Agreement (Goodman Sales CO), Employment Agreement (Goodman Sales CO)

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.