Common use of Additional Disease Indications Clause in Contracts

Additional Disease Indications. 2.4.1 At any time prior to the ****of the Effective Date (the “Election Term”), Licensee may nominate in writing to Licensor a specific disease indication for inclusion in the “Field” under this Agreement. Within **** of Licensor’s receipt of such notice, Licensor will inform Licensee in writing whether the nominated disease indication is available for licensing based on whether it: (a) is a disease indication set forth on Exhibit D; provided that the indications so listed do not constitute a limitation on the indications Licensee may nominate; (b) is the subject of a conflicting license with a Third Party (or the subject of a license being negotiated with a Third Party, as to which (i) there has been a written request for license terms from such Third Party, (ii) such Third Party or Licensor has submitted a written proposal for terms for a license (which may be limited to financial terms), (iii) Licensor and such Third Party have entered into a confidentiality agreement for purposes of such Third Party conducting a due diligence review, and (iv) a “writing” for purposes of the foregoing clauses includes e-mail correspondence); or (c) is part of an existing Licensor program (i.e., a program that is the subject of on-going advanced preclinical study (e.g., there has been a pre-IND meeting) or is in clinical development or at a later stage of development or commercialization). If the nominated disease indication is subject to a conflicting Third Party license or subject to an existing Licensor program, then the disease indication will be deemed rejected. Otherwise, the specific disease indication will be deemed available for licensing, and the Field will automatically be deemed to include the nominated specific disease indication immediately upon Licensor’s delivery of a confirmatory written notice. For purposes of nominating a disease indication for inclusion in the ****CERTAIN INFORMATION HAS BEEN OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION. CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT HAS BEEN REQUESTED WITH RESPECT TO THE OMITTED PORTIONS. CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED “Field,” the indication must be a specific type of condition and not a general disease class, for instance “mucopolysaccharidosis (MPS) VI” and not “mucopolysaccharidosis (MPS)” and “hemophilia A” not “hemophilia.” If Licensor determines that a disease indication nominated by Licensee pursuant to this Section 2.4 is not specific, Licensor will notify Licensee within ****of Licensor’s receipt of the notice of nomination, and the Parties will negotiate in good faith as to the proposed scope and definition of the nominated disease indication.

Additional Disease Indications. 2.4.1 At any time prior to the […****…]of the Effective Date (the “Election Term”), Licensee may nominate in writing to Licensor a specific disease indication for inclusion in the “Field” under this Agreement. Within […**** …] of Licensor’s receipt of such notice, Licensor will inform Licensee in writing whether the nominated disease indication is available for licensing based on whether it: (a) is a disease indication set forth on Exhibit D; provided that the indications so listed do not constitute a limitation on the indications Licensee may nominate; (b) is the subject of a conflicting license with a Third Party (or the subject of a license being negotiated with a Third Party, as to which (i) there has been a written request for license terms from such Third Party, (ii) such Third Party or Licensor has submitted a written proposal for terms for a license (which may be limited to financial terms), (iii) Licensor and such Third Party have entered into a confidentiality agreement for purposes of such Third Party conducting a due diligence review, and (iv) a “writing” for purposes of the foregoing clauses includes e-mail correspondence); or (c) is part of an existing Licensor program (i.e., a program that is the subject of on-going advanced preclinical study (e.g., there has been a pre-IND meeting) or is in clinical development or at a later stage of development or commercialization). If the nominated disease indication is subject to a conflicting Third Party license or subject to an existing Licensor program, then the disease indication will be deemed rejected. Otherwise, the specific disease indication will be deemed available for licensing, and the Field will automatically be deemed to include the nominated specific disease indication immediately upon Licensor’s delivery of a confirmatory written notice. For purposes of nominating a disease indication for inclusion in the *** Confidential Treatment Requested **CERTAIN INFORMATION HAS BEEN OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION. CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT HAS BEEN REQUESTED WITH RESPECT TO THE OMITTED PORTIONS. CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED * “Field,” the indication must be a specific type of condition and not a general disease class, for instance “mucopolysaccharidosis (MPS) VI” and not “mucopolysaccharidosis (MPS)” and “hemophilia A” not “hemophilia.” If Licensor determines that a disease indication nominated by Licensee pursuant to this Section 2.4 is not specific, Licensor will notify Licensee within […****…]of Licensor’s receipt of the notice of nomination, and the Parties will negotiate in good faith as to the proposed scope and definition of the nominated disease indication.

Additional Disease Indications. 2.4.1 At any time prior to the […****…]of the Effective Date (the “Election Term”), Licensee may nominate in writing to Licensor a specific disease indication for inclusion in the “Field” under this Agreement. Within […**** …] of Licensor’s receipt of such notice, Licensor will inform Licensee in writing whether the nominated disease indication is available for licensing based on whether it: (a) is a disease indication set forth on Exhibit DD ; provided that the indications so listed do not constitute a limitation on the indications Licensee may nominate; (b) is the subject of a conflicting license with a Third Party (or the subject of a license being negotiated with a Third Party, as to which (i) there has been a written request for license terms from such Third Party, (ii) such Third Party or Licensor has submitted a written proposal for terms for a license (which may be limited to financial terms), (iii) Licensor and such Third Party have entered into a confidentiality agreement for purposes of such Third Party conducting a due diligence review, and (iv) a “writing” for purposes of the foregoing clauses includes e-mail correspondence); or (c) is part of an existing Licensor program (( i.e., a program that is the subject of on-going advanced preclinical study (( e.g., there has been a pre-IND meeting) or is in clinical development or at a later stage of development or commercialization). If the nominated disease indication is subject to a conflicting Third Party license or subject to an existing Licensor program, then the disease indication will be deemed rejected. Otherwise, the specific disease indication will be deemed available for licensing, and the Field will automatically be deemed to include the nominated specific disease indication immediately upon Licensor’s delivery of a confirmatory written notice. For purposes of nominating a disease indication for inclusion in the *** Confidential Treatment Requested **CERTAIN INFORMATION HAS BEEN OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION. CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT HAS BEEN REQUESTED WITH RESPECT TO THE OMITTED PORTIONS. CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED * “Field,” the indication must be a specific type of condition and not a general disease class, for instance “mucopolysaccharidosis (MPS) VI” and not “mucopolysaccharidosis (MPS)” and “hemophilia A” not “hemophilia.” If Licensor determines that a disease indication nominated by Licensee pursuant to this Section 2.4 is not specific, Licensor will notify Licensee within […****…]of Licensor’s receipt of the notice of nomination, and the Parties will negotiate in good faith as to the proposed scope and definition of the nominated disease indication.