Common use of Amendments to Key Concurrency Components Clause in Contracts

Amendments to Key Concurrency Components. (1) The procedures set forth in paragraph (2) shall apply in the event that the County, a City or the School Board wishes to amend any of the following: a. Level of service (LOS) standards; b. Concurrency service areas; c. Procedures of monitoring school demand and capacity; d. Procedures and methodology for making concurrency determinations for development approvals; e. Mitigation processes; f. The 5-Year Work Program for facilities that are located within the unincorporated areas of the County or City to the extent that such amendment is a major modification to the Program, however, minor amendments to the Program are not subject to this paragraph; and g. Those aspects of the Public Schools Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan that are common to the County and municipalities in the County. (2) Procedures: a. The party wishing to amend one of the above-listed items shall be the “Initiating Party.” The Initiating Party may be the County, the School Board, or a municipality within Lake County subject to the requirements of school concurrency. b. The party reviewing and commenting on proposed amendments shall be the “Reviewing Party.” The Reviewing Party shall include the County, the School Board, or a municipality within Lake County subject to the requirements of school concurrency. c. Before officially considering an amendment to one of the above-listed standards, and prior to submitting such amendments to the Department of Community Affairs, if required, the Initiating Party shall transmit to the Reviewing Parties a memorandum outlining the proposed amendment, including a narrative describing the purpose of the proposed amendment and a statement regarding the impact of the proposed amendment on the County or City’s Comprehensive Plan and other elements of school concurrency addressed by this Agreement. The memorandum also must include all data and analysis supporting the proposed amendment. d. Within sixty (60) days of its receipt of a proposed amendment from the Initiating Party, the Reviewing Party shall provide any written comments or objections to the Initiating Party, the County and the municipalities within Lake County. The Reviewing Party shall indicate whether it consents to the proposed amendment or, if it does not, the reasons for withholding its consent. Designees of the parties, and designees of the municipalities within Lake County, may meet and confer prior to the Reviewing Party’s submission of written comments in order to resolve any objections to the proposed amendment. Failure of any party to respond within the sixty (60) day period shall constitute consent to the proposed amendment. e. If the Reviewing Party is unable to consent to the proposed amendment, the matter will be resolved pursuant to the dispute resolution process set forth in this Agreement. f. The parties agree that no proposed amendment will be implemented if any of the Reviewing Parties raises an objection unless the dispute resolution process set forth in this Agreement has been concluded. g. The parties agree that, once a proposed amendment has the consent of or has not been objected to by each of the Reviewing Parties, or is determined to be appropriate through dispute resolution, each party will undertake Work Program, Comprehensive Plan, and regulatory changes necessary to effectuate the amendment.

Amendments to Key Concurrency Components. (1) The procedures set forth in paragraph (2) as follows shall apply in the event that the County, a City or the School Board wishes parties wish to amend any of the following: a. Level : level of service (LOS) standards; b. Concurrency ; concurrency service areas; c. Procedures ; procedures of monitoring school demand and capacity; d. Procedures ; procedures and methodology for making concurrency determinations for development approvals; e. Mitigation ; mitigation options and processes; f. The ; the District Facilities Work Program (aka ‘5-Year Facilities Work Program Plan’) for facilities that are located within the unincorporated areas of the County or City to the extent that such amendment is a major modification to the Program, however, minor amendments to the Program are not subject to this paragraph; and g. Those aspects within incorporated areas of the Public Schools Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan that are common to the County and municipalities in the Countyan affected City. (2) Procedures: a. 11.3.1 The party wishing to amend one of the above-listed items items, shall be the “Initiating Party.” The Initiating Party may be the County, a City, or the School Board, or a municipality within Lake County subject to the requirements of school concurrency. b. 11.3.2 The party reviewing and commenting on proposed amendments shall be the “Reviewing Party.” The Reviewing Party shall include may be the County, a City, or the School Board, or a municipality within Lake . The County subject and the Cities shall review proposed amendments and advise the other parties to this Interlocal Agreement on whether the requirements of school concurrencyproposed amendment is consistent with the comprehensive plan. c. 11.3.3 Before officially considering an amendment to one of the above-listed standardskey concurrency components, and prior to submitting transmitting such amendments to the Department of Community Affairsfor state agency review, if required, the Initiating Party shall transmit to the Reviewing Parties a memorandum outlining the proposed amendment, including a narrative describing the purpose of the proposed amendment and a statement regarding the impact of the proposed amendment on the County comprehensive plan of the County, or affected City’s Comprehensive Plan , and other elements of school concurrency addressed by this Interlocal Agreement. The memorandum also must include all data and analysis supporting the proposed amendment. d. 11.3.4 Within sixty (60) days of its receipt of a proposed amendment from the Initiating Party, the Reviewing Party shall provide any written comments or objections to the Initiating Party, the County and the municipalities within Lake County. The Reviewing Party shall indicate whether it consents to the proposed amendment or, if it does not, the reasons for withholding its consent. Designees of the parties, and designees of the municipalities within Lake County, the Cities and the School Board may meet and confer prior to the Reviewing Party’s submission of written comments in order to resolve any objections to the proposed amendment. Failure of any party to respond within the sixty (60) day period shall constitute consent to the proposed amendment. e. 11.3.5 If the Reviewing Party is unable to consent to the proposed amendment, the matter will be resolved pursuant to the dispute resolution process set forth in Section 13 of this Interlocal Agreement. f. 11.3.6 The parties agree that no proposed amendment will be implemented if any without the consent of the Reviewing Parties raises an objection or, where the consent of all Reviewing Parties is not obtained, that no proposed amendment will be implemented unless it is determined to be appropriate through the dispute resolution process set forth in of this Agreement has been concludedInterlocal Agreement. g. 11.3.7 The parties agree that, once a proposed amendment has the consent of or has not been objected to by each of the Reviewing Parties, or is determined to be appropriate through dispute resolution, each party will undertake Work Programwork program, Comprehensive Plancomprehensive plan, and or regulatory changes necessary to effectuate the amendment.

Amendments to Key Concurrency Components. (1a) The procedures set forth in paragraph (2b) shall apply in the event that the County, a City or the School Board wishes to amend any of the following: a. Level 1. level of service (LOS) standards; b. Concurrency 2. concurrency service areas; c. Procedures of 3. procedures for monitoring school demand and capacity; d. Procedures 4. procedures and methodology for making concurrency determinations for development approvals; e. Mitigation 5. mitigation options and processes; f. The 6. the 5-Year Work Program for facilities that are located within the unincorporated areas whose CSA includes a portion of the County or City to the extent that such amendment is a major modification to the Program, however, minor amendments to the Program are not subject to this paragraphCity; and g. Those 7. those aspects of the Public Schools Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan that are common to the City and the County and or other municipalities in the County. (2b) Procedures: a. 1. The party wishing to amend one of the above-listed items items, shall be the “Initiating Party.” The Initiating Party may be the City, County, the School Board, or a another municipality within Lake Hillsborough County subject to the requirements of school concurrency. b. 2. The party reviewing and commenting on a proposed amendments amendment shall be the “Reviewing Party.” The Reviewing Party shall include the City, County, the School Board, or a another municipality within Lake Hillsborough County subject to the requirements of school concurrency.. The Planning Commission shall review the proposed amendment and advise the City on whether the proposed amendment is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan as required by sections 163.3177 and 163.3187, F.S. c. 3. Before officially considering an amendment to one of the above-listed standards, and prior to submitting such amendments to the Department of Community Affairs, if required, the Initiating Party shall transmit to the Reviewing Parties a memorandum outlining the proposed amendment, including a narrative describing the purpose of the proposed amendment and a statement regarding the impact of the proposed amendment on the County or City’s Comprehensive Plan and other elements of school concurrency addressed by this Agreement. The memorandum also must include all data and analysis supporting the proposed amendment. d. 4. Within sixty (60) days of its receipt of a proposed amendment from the Initiating Party, the Reviewing Party shall provide any written comments or objections to the Initiating Party, the County County, and the other municipalities within Lake Hillsborough County. The Reviewing Party shall indicate whether it consents to the proposed amendment or, if it does not, the reasons for withholding its consent. Designees of the parties, and designees of the County and other municipalities within Lake Hillsborough County, may meet and confer prior to the Reviewing Party’s submission of written comments in order to resolve any objections to the proposed amendment. Failure of any party to respond within the sixty (60) day period shall constitute consent to the proposed amendment. e. 5. If the Reviewing Party is unable to consent to the proposed amendment, the matter will be resolved pursuant to the dispute resolution process set forth in Section 8 of this Agreement. f. 6. The parties agree that no proposed amendment will be implemented if any without the consent of the Reviewing Parties raises an objection or, where the consent of all Reviewing Parties is not obtained, that no proposed amendment will be implemented unless it is determined to be appropriate through the dispute resolution process set forth in Section 8 of this Agreement has been concludedAgreement. g. 7. The parties agree that, once a proposed amendment has the consent of or has not been objected to by each of the Reviewing Parties, or is determined to be appropriate through dispute resolution, each party will undertake Work Program, Comprehensive Plan, and regulatory changes necessary to effectuate the amendment.