Planning Process. By November 30, the Trustees shall give notice of a Meeting of the Members in order to review the proposed budget and the use of the Funds Available for the next fiscal year. The notice of the meeting shall be given in the manner set out in Article 8.
Planning Process. Contractor shall ensure that the person-centered planning process is initiated and the service plan is developed within fifteen (15) days after Contractor is notified that the Enrollee is determined eligible for HCBS Waiver services. The planning process shall be led, when possible, by the Enrollee and include individuals chosen by the Enrollee. An Enrollee’s HCBS Provider(s), or those who have an interest in or are employed by the HCBS Provider(s), shall not participate in the planning process, unless the provision at 42 CFR 441.301(c)(1)(vi) is met. Contractor is responsible for procedures to assist Enrollees in the planning process, including how to resolve conflicts and disagreements that includes conflict-of- interest guidelines. The Enrollee’s Care Coordinator will assist the Enrollee in leading the HCBS Waiver person-centered service planning and will coordinate with the Interdisciplinary Care Team (ICT).
Planning Process i. Give a brief history of the scoping process and all other public involvement, coordination, and previous planning efforts (corridor or subarea plans) relevant to the current project.
ii. Discuss the related studies and relevant documents, including state and local long- range plans, comprehensive plans, land use plans, transportation plans, and other thoroughfare and mobility plans and their context for the proposed project. DocuSign Envelope ID: 96ECF328-ADFC-48E2-AAEF-44272BE1E265
iii. If the proposed project is not reflected in the state or regional plan, explain the basis for the proposed project.
iv. List and justify issues for detailed study as determined by the scoping process or previous plan-level studies that meet the State’s requirements for public involvement and agency coordination.
v. List and justify issues eliminated from detailed study based on the scoping process or previous plan-level studies that meet the State’s requirements for public involvement and agency coordination.
Planning Process. Where the Site has been selected by the Relevant Participant notwithstanding advice by hubco that there is a there is a significant risk of any Planning Appeal, Planning Call-In or Planning Proceeding and, other than as a result of breach of this Agreement by hubco or any hubco Party or failure to comply with the Planning Act by hubco or any hubco Party, there is a significant risk of any Planning Appeal, Planning Call-In or Planning Proceeding, it may be appropriate to increase the relevant element of the Project Development Fee specified in Proforma [2]. [mechanical aspects to be developed where relevant by Preferred Tenderer's Final Tender Submission26] Part 6 - APPROVAL PROCESS FOR NEW PROJECTS The purpose of this Schedule Part 6 (Approval Process for New Projects) is to set out how hubco and the Participants will work together to agree which New Projects will be taken forward and approved for development by xxxxx and on what basis. It sets out a two‑stage approval process for New Projects. The provisions of paragraphs 3 to 6 of this Schedule Part 6 shall apply in relation to Qualifying Projects whether or not the period of ten (10) years from the Commencement Date has expired. The Parties may agree to utilise this process (amended as appropriate) in respect of other Project Services under Clause 9.3 but are not obliged to do so. hubco will, as an integral part of its overall service delivery in relation to the development and approval of New Projects and without entitlement to specific or additional payment: work with the Participants and relevant Community Planning Partnerships to develop local delivery plans which will then form the basis of the updated TDP; and work with the Participants to review the applicability of the TDP to the provision of Community Services in the Territory and to decide which New Projects to proceed with, so that Participants can make informed decisions as to which projects may become New Projects. hubco will, as an integral part of its overall service delivery in relation to the development and approval of New Projects and without entitlement to specific or additional payment, work with the Participants and other members of the TPB (and, where relevant, with the Community Planning Partnerships) to: identify, analyse and discuss the Participants' collective and individual accommodation requirements; assist in the development of local delivery plans and review their applicability to the provision of Community Services in the...
Planning Process. Unless specifically waived by the State Board, the Charter School shall comply with all requirements of state law for a goal setting and planning process, including, without limitation, the establishment of annual goals and objectives, the establishment of a Unified Improvement Plan (UIP), the creation and involvement of an accountability committee, and publication of an annual report to the public to be presented at a District School Board meeting. The Charter School’s accountability committee (“SAC”) shall report to the District’s Accountability Committee (“DAC”) to the same extent and in the same format as other District schools.
Planning Process i. Give a brief history of the scoping process and all other public involvement, coordination, and previous planning efforts (corridor or subarea plans) relevant to the current project.
ii. Discuss the related studies and relevant documents, including state and local long- range plans, comprehensive plans, land use plans, transportation plans, and other thoroughfare and mobility plans and their context for the proposed project.
iii. If the proposed project is not reflected in the state or regional plan, explain the basis for the proposed project.
iv. List and justify issues for detailed study as determined by the scoping process or previous plan-level studies that meet the State’s requirements for public involvement and agency coordination.
v. List and justify issues eliminated from detailed study based on the scoping process or previous plan-level studies that meet the State’s requirements for public involvement and agency coordination.
Planning Process. 4.1 The Parties will review, on a quarterly basis, Groundco's Quarterly Forecast of Hub Operating Requirements and Airco's capability for the next four quarters no later than 30 days prior to the start of each fiscal quarter. The Parties will conduct, in the third quarter of each year, a formal annual budget review with respect to the Services for the upcoming year. The initial Quarterly Forecast of Hub Operating Requirements is set forth in Schedule 8. During the fourth quarter of each fiscal year, the Parties will hold weekly meetings at the option of either Party.
Planning Process. (a) Annually, the School Board shall submit to the local governments the TDEFP inclusive of the education plant survey of approved projects, for review and comment twenty (20) days prior to the public hearing for adoption by the School Board. The Plan shall be consistent with the requirements of Section 1013.35, Florida Statutes, and include projected student populations apportioned geographically, an inventory of existing school facilities, projections of facility space needs, information on relocatables, options to reduce the need for additional permanent student stations, and as an attachment general locations of new schools for the five (5), ten (10) and twenty (20) year time periods.
(b) Amendments to the five (5) year work program and/or the Educational Plant survey shall be submitted to working group for comment.
(c) The financially feasible School Board Work Program (hereinafter the “SBWP”) shall use the first five (5) years of the Tentative District Educational Facilities Work Program.
(d) Within ten (10) days of submittal, the Working Group shall review the SBWP program and provide a written report to the School Board regarding:
(1) Infrastructure and service needs associated with the proposed education facilities and other applicable information; and
(2) Whether a comprehensive plan amendment will be necessary for any proposed educational facility.
(e) Based on the written report, the School Board shall consider changes and make same as needed to the SBWP where appropriate.
(f) Amendments to the SBWP and/or the TDEFP shall be submitted to the Working Group for comment.
Planning Process. City and NRD agree to cooperate to facilitate exchanges of land or transfer of NRD trails and trail corridor to City that may be advantageous to preserve and improve trails and ensure future planned trails are possible. Once transfers of trail corridor property to City, City shall utilize its personnel and expertise to make judgments as to desirable urban development patterns and standards and specification for roadway and utility development, as well as work on successful negotiations with developers and landowners that City may already have worked with in the past. Control of the land by City shall ensure that the trails are protected and the public interest is served in the development process.
Planning Process. The Parties intend that this Agreement will fulfill the NCCPA requirements pertaining to planning agreements and will establish a mutually agreeable process for preparing a Plan that fulfills the requirements of the NCCPA and FESA.
5.1. NCCPA Planning Process for the Santa Xxxxx Valley HCP/NCCP The process used to develop the Plan will incorporate independent scientific input and analysis, and public participation to ensure that the general public, as well as key stakeholders, have sufficient opportunity for comment.
