Assessment Methodology Sample Clauses

Assessment Methodology. Prior to undertaking the initial inspection you are required to complete the Manufacturer’s section of the Check list for the initial inspection or monitoring of the factory production control according to the applicable standard and submit supporting evidence. TÜV UK will undertake an Initial Inspection of the Factory and Factory Production Control System and undertake Continuous surveillance of the FPC system in accordance with the requirements of the applicable standard.

Assessment Methodology. This compliance assessment involved activities before, during, and following the onsite visit by the monitoring team and the Parties. The team consists of Xx. Xxxxxxx X. Ray, X.Xx., Monitor; Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, MD, Psychiatrist; and, Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx, MD, Correctional Medicine. Pre-visit activities ensured involvement and input from officials and legal counsel representing the Territory (defendant) and the United States (plaintiff) in the planning of the site visit. Pre- visit activities included conference calls and exchange of relevant documents intended to maximize clarity and mutual understanding for baseline assessment visit purposes and scheduling, and monitoring expectations in general. Pursuant to Section X.D.1 of the 2013 Settlement Agreement, the Monitor provided the following information to the Territory and Department of Justice officials for review and comment. This information intended to provide to the Parties: 1) the description of how compliance with the Agreement will be assessed; 2) how information necessary for on and off site assessment work will be gathered; and, 3) what information the Monitor will require the defendants to routinely report and with what frequency.

Assessment Methodology. 12.2.1 This heritage impact assessment follows the criteria and guidelines stipulated in Annexes 10 and 19 of the TM on EIA Process together with the other guidelines and requirements discussed above. This assessment focuses on the potential impact on the cultural and historical heritage of proposed development in the vicinity of SEKD. 12.2.2 A comprehensive marine archaeological review was carried out to determine the archaeological potential of the study area. This included examination of AMO records and archaeological and historical academic publications. 12.2.3 All archives holding information on shipwrecks in Hong Kong waters were explored for relevant data.

Assessment Methodology. The SPA methodology herein is based on the standard CMS methodology and is described in the Framework for Independent Assessment of Security and Privacy Controls. The Auditor must prepare and Web-broker must submit a Security Privacy Controls Assessment Test Plan (SAP) that describes the Auditor’s scope and methodology of the assessment. Web-broker must submit the Auditor-prepared SAP at least thirty (30) Days prior to commencing the assessment. The assessment methods may include examination of documentation, logs, and configurations; interviews of personnel; and/or testing of technical controls. The SPA must provide an accurate depiction of the security and privacy controls in place, as well as potential security and privacy risks, by identifying the following: a. Application or system vulnerabilities, the associated business and system risks and potential impact; b. Weaknesses in the configuration management process such as weak system configuration settings that may compromise the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the system; c. Web-broker security and privacy policies and procedures; and d. Major documentation omissions and/or discrepancies. 9 This document is located on CMS zONE at the following link: xxxxx://xxxx.xxx.xxx/document/privacy-and- security-audit. 9F

Assessment Methodology. The SPA assessment methodology described herein is based on the standard CMS methodology used in the assessment of all CMS internal and business partner information systems. The Non-Exchange Entity shall prepare an assessment plan to evaluate any system vulnerabilities. The assessment methods may include examination of documentation, logs, and configurations; interviews of personnel; and/or testing of technical controls. The SPA assessment shall provide an accurate depiction of the security and privacy controls in place, as well as potential security and privacy risks, by identifying the following: a. Application or system vulnerabilities, the associated business and system risks and potential impact; b. Weaknesses in the configuration management process such as weak system configuration settings that may compromise the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the system; c. Non-Exchange Entity security and privacy policies and procedures; and d. Major documentation omissions and/or discrepancies.

Assessment Methodology. 5.1 – Global Performance - Objective: Eligible (Green) • 1001 AM - kits /third parties • 1002 CPM • 1003 P6 • 1004 P4 and P5 • 1005 MOGI-MIRIM a) Logistics:

Assessment Methodology. 7.5.1 The Project is tentatively scheduled to be commenced in early 2008 and to be completed in late 2009. The Project area is indicated in Drawing 7.1. The construction activities of the Project include: • demolition of an existing fuel hydrant system buried in south apron area; • demolition of underground fuel tanks near the ex-GFS building and fuel supply system (including refuelling pits and underground fuel pipelines) in the ex-GFS apron area; and • demolition of the fuel dolphin structure down to 1m below the existing seabed level. The abandoned fuel pipelines will be left in place and, if necessary, grouting it with concrete. • decontamination works, including excavation, biopiling and solidification/stabilization for the contaminated soil identified in the south apron, the narrow strip of the north apron near the Kai Tak Tunnel and the ex-GFS apron area. 7.5.2 All the decommissioning activities and decontamination process would be carried out within the Project area. There will be no off-site works area for this Project. All the construction activities would be carried out during 0700 to 1900 hours on weekdays (Monday to Saturday excluding general holidays). 7.5.3 Any construction activities taking place concurrently within 300m of a given noise assessment point are considered to contribute to the cumulative impact at that NSR. Referring to the construction programme of the Project and other projects within the study area, it is noted that construction period of following projects might overlap with this Project: • Kai Tak Development Advance Works – Construction of local access roads (Roads TD3, TD4 and Road L14), sewage pumping station, public landing steps cum fireboat berth, electricity substation (by CLP) etc commencing from 2008 to early 2012; • Contract 2 of Kai Tak Development Advance Works – Construction of Local Access Roads, and Sewage Pumping Station, etc at the former Kai Tak Airport runway commencing from early 2009 to early 2012; • Cruise Terminal Construction (including dredging, and construction of berth structure, transition structure, and terminal building) commencing from later half of 2008 until 2020; • Operation of the barging points and works area for removal of C&D materials from Development at Xxxx Xxx and Xxxxxx Valley (at former Kai Tak Airport runway) undertaking now and to be completed by December 2008. • Operation of the barging point at southwest of the former Kai Tak Airport runway and haul road within Kai Tak for re...

Assessment Methodology. The assessment methodology, depending on the Customer’s needs, follows the standards Ethical Hacking methodology including four phases.

Assessment Methodology. 7.4.1.1 Land contamination assessment was carried out according to the abovementioned EIAO-TM, Guidance Note, Practice Guide, Guidance Manual as well as the requirements given in Section

Assessment Methodology. 6.3.1.1 The assessment of waste management impacts arising from the construction and operation activities of the Revitalisation of Tai Wai Nullah, has been undertaken in accordance with the EIA Study Brief and criteria given in Annexes 7 and 15 of the EIAO-TM and includes the following tasks: ⚫ Identification of the construction and operation activities of the Project which could give rise to waste arising; ⚫ Estimation of types and quantities of waste generated; ⚫ Examination of opportunities for waste reduction and re-use (both on-site and off-site) and the required disposal options for each waste; ⚫ Evaluation of potential impacts caused by improper handling, collection, transportation and re-use / disposal of wastes with respect to potential hazards, air and odour emissions, noise, wastewater discharges and public transport.