Common use of Assignment of School District’s Right to File Direct Claims against the Clause in Contracts

Assignment of School District’s Right to File Direct Claims against the. Prime Contractor for Architectural Designer’s Damages. The Architectural Designer agrees that in no event shall the School District be liable to the Architectural Designer for payment of additional compensation for any direct, indirect or impact damages, including but not limited to costs of acceleration or for loss of revenue, overhead or profit, or for any delay damages, costs or expenses, including but not limited to attorneys’ fees, court costs and legal expenses of whatever kind or nature, arising from any changes in any of the Architectural Designer’s Services required under this Contract, including, without limitation, additional or different services, or changes in the time of performance, that are caused by or attributed to the fault, negligence, breach of contract, or willful act or omission of the Prime Contractor or any of its subcontractors or consultants on the Project, or the delay, disruption, interference or hindrance of the Prime Contractor or any of its subcontractors or consultants in construction on the Project. Instead, as its sole right and remedy with respect to such fault, negligence, breach of contract, willful act or omission, or such delay, disruption, interference or hindrance, of the Prime Contractor or any of its subcontractors or consultants, the Architectural Designer shall be entitled to make, assert, file or bring a direct claim, action, cause of action or lawsuit against the Prime Contractor or any of its subcontractors or consultants, as an assignee of the School District, pursuant to this Paragraph 3.14.3. For the sole and only purposes of making, asserting, filing or bringing direct claims, actions, causes of actions or lawsuits against the Prime Contractor or any of its subcontractors or consultants, the School District hereby assigns to the Architectural Designer the School District’s right under the Prime Contract to make, assert, file or bring direct claims, actions, causes of action or lawsuits against the Prime Contractor or any of its subcontractors or consultants for any additional compensation, damages, losses, costs and expenses of the Architectural Designer that are caused by or attributed to the fault, negligence, breach of contract, or willful act or omission of the Prime Contractor or any of its subcontractors or consultants on the Project, or the delay, disruption, interference or hindrance of the Prime Contractor or any of its subcontractors or consultants in construction on the Project.

Assignment of School District’s Right to File Direct Claims against the. Prime Contractor for Architectural DesignerEnvironmental Consultant’s Damages. The Architectural Designer Environmental Consultant agrees that in no event shall the School District be liable to the Architectural Designer Environmental Consultant for payment of additional compensation for any direct, indirect or impact damages, including but not limited to costs of acceleration or for loss of revenue, overhead or profit, or for any delay damages, costs or expenses, including but not limited to attorneys’ fees, court costs and legal expenses of whatever kind or nature, arising from any changes in any of the Architectural DesignerEnvironmental Consultant’s Services required under this Contract, including, without limitation, additional or different services, or changes in the time of performance, that are caused by or attributed to the fault, negligence, breach of contract, or willful act or omission of the Prime Contractor or any of its subcontractors or consultants on the Project, or the delay, disruption, interference or hindrance of the Prime Contractor or any of its subcontractors or consultants in construction on the Project. Instead, as its sole right and remedy with respect to such fault, negligence, breach of contract, willful act or omission, or such delay, disruption, interference or hindrance, of the Prime Contractor or any of its subcontractors or consultants, the Architectural Designer Environmental Consultant shall be entitled to make, assert, file or bring a direct claim, action, cause of action or lawsuit against the Prime Contractor or any of its subcontractors or consultants, as an assignee of the School District, pursuant to this Paragraph 3.14.33.13.3. For the sole and only purposes of making, asserting, filing or bringing direct claims, actions, causes of actions or lawsuits against the Prime Contractor or any of its subcontractors or consultants, the School District hereby assigns to the Architectural Designer Environmental Consultant the School District’s right under the Prime Contract to make, assert, file or bring direct claims, actions, causes of action or lawsuits against the Prime Contractor or any of its subcontractors or consultants for any additional compensation, damages, losses, costs and expenses of the Architectural Designer Environmental Consultant that are caused by or attributed to the fault, negligence, breach of contract, or willful act or omission of the Prime Contractor or any of its subcontractors or consultants on the Project, or the delay, disruption, interference or hindrance of the Prime Contractor or any of its subcontractors or consultants in construction on the Project.

Assignment of School District’s Right to File Direct Claims against the. Prime Contractor for Architectural DesignerMEP Engineer’s Damages. The Architectural Designer MEP Engineer agrees that in no event shall the School District be liable to the Architectural Designer MEP Engineer for payment of additional compensation for any direct, indirect or impact damages, including but not limited to costs of acceleration or for loss of revenue, overhead or profit, or for any delay damages, costs or expenses, including but not limited to attorneys’ fees, court costs and legal expenses of whatever kind or nature, arising from any changes in any of the Architectural DesignerMEP Engineer’s Services required under this Contract, including, without limitation, additional or different services, or changes in the time of performance, that are caused by or attributed to the fault, negligence, breach of contract, or willful act or omission of the Prime Contractor or any of its subcontractors or consultants on the Project, or the delay, disruption, interference or hindrance of the Prime Contractor or any of its subcontractors or consultants in construction on the Project. Instead, as its sole right and remedy with respect to such fault, negligence, breach of contract, willful act or omission, or such delay, disruption, interference or hindrance, of the Prime Contractor or any of its subcontractors or consultants, the Architectural Designer MEP Engineer shall be entitled to make, assert, file or bring a direct claim, action, cause of action or lawsuit against the Prime Contractor or any of its subcontractors or consultants, as an assignee of the School District, pursuant to this Paragraph 3.14.3. For the sole and only purposes of making, asserting, filing or bringing direct claims, actions, causes of actions or lawsuits against the Prime Contractor or any of its subcontractors or consultants, the School District hereby assigns to the Architectural Designer MEP Engineer the School District’s right under the Prime Contract to make, assert, file or bring direct claims, actions, causes of action or lawsuits against the Prime Contractor or any of its subcontractors or consultants for any additional compensation, damages, losses, costs and expenses of the Architectural Designer MEP Engineer that are caused by or attributed to the fault, negligence, breach of contract, or willful act or omission of the Prime Contractor or any of its subcontractors or consultants on the Project, or the delay, disruption, interference or hindrance of the Prime Contractor or any of its subcontractors or consultants in construction on the Project.