Basis for Request. A written request for a Position Responsibility Review may be submitted by an employee, the Association President, or a supervisor who believes a substantial change in the employee’s assigned job responsibilities has occurred (other than through an Interim Assignment). Relief for the position shall be provided only if:
Basis for Request. The reclassification review process, when requested, is intended to resolve the issue of whether an individual’s regularly assigned job responsibilities require a change in the individual’s job classification. A written request for a reclassification review may be submitted by an employee, the Association President, or an administrator who asserts a substantial change in the employee’s assigned job responsibilities has occurred. The request shall be granted only if such changes have resulted in at least half of the employee’s time being spent on duties appropriate only to a different position (by comparison to the historic base, rather than looking only at recent incremental changes).
Basis for Request. A written request for a reclassification review may be submitted by an employee, the Association President or an administrator who believes a substantial change in the employee’s assigned job responsibilities has occurred. The request shall be granted only if such changes have resulted in at least half of the employee’s time being spent on duties appropriate only to a different position (by comparison to the historic base, rather than looking only at recent incremental changes).
Basis for Request. The Company enters into this Agreement with the understanding and on the representation that the District shall act fairly and reasonably in the event that, pursuant to the Cable Act, the District, subsequent to the Effective Date of this Agreement, grants, renews or renegotiates one (1) or more other franchises for the operation of an Open Video System in the Franchise Area (“Other OVS Franchise”).
Basis for Request. The Company enters into this Agreement with the understanding and on the representation that the District shall act fairly and reasonably in the event that, pursuant to the Cable Act, the District, subsequent to the Effective Date of this Agreement, grants, renews or renegotiates one (1) or more other franchises for the operation of a Cable Communications System in the Franchise Area (“Other Cable Franchise”). To the extent the District does not have lawful authority over the relevant benefits and burdens described in the following paragraph, the term “Other Cable Franchise” as used in this Section 14 shall not include municipally owned Cable Communications Systems or Open Video Systems, video dialtone systems or similar systems. If the Company believes the agreement pursuant to which such Other Cable Franchise may be granted (hereinafter the “Other Cable Franchise Agreement”) bestows benefits and imposes burdens on the franchisee which, as an economic or operational matter, on balance, are materially more advantageous to such third party than the benefits bestowed and burdens imposed on the Company by this Agreement are to the Company, then, at any one (1) time but not sooner than the effective date of the Other Cable Franchise or later than eighteen (18) months after the effective date of the Other Cable Franchise, the Company may request that OCTT make a determination to such effect; in the event of such a determination, the Company may request renegotiation of the terms and conditions of this Agreement as provided below. The discharge in bankruptcy of any obligations of the Other Cable Franchise Agreement shall not be a basis for the Company to request such a determination.
