Best Interests and No Dilution Sample Clauses

Best Interests and No Dilution. The Joint Advisor believes that (i) participation in the Merger is in the best interests of each of CCT and FSIC and (ii) the interests of existing stockholders of CCT and FSIC will not be diluted as a result of the Merger.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Best Interests and No Dilution. GC Advisors believes that (i) participation in the Mergers is in the best interests of each of GBDC 3 and GBDC and (ii) the interests of existing stockholders of GBDC 3 and GBDC will not be diluted (as provided under Rule 17a-8 of the Investment Company Act) as a result of the Mergers.
Best Interests and No Dilution. Adviser believes that (i) participation in the Mergers is in the best interests of each of SLIC and PIF and (ii) the interests of existing stockholders of SLIC and members of PIF will not be diluted (as provided under Rule 17a-8 promulgated under the Investment Company Act) as a result of the Mergers.
Best Interests and No Dilution. Each of BCIA (in the case of BCIC) and TCP (in the case of TCPC) believes that (i) participation in the Merger is in the best interests of BCIC (in the case of BCIA) and TCPC (in the case of TCP), and (ii) the interests of existing stockholders of BCIC (in the case of BCIA) and TCPC (in the case of TCP), as applicable, will not be diluted (as provided under Rule 17a-8 of the Investment Company Act) as a result of the Merger.
Best Interests and No Dilution. Each of OTF Adviser (in the case of OTF) and OTF II Adviser (in the case of OTF II) believes that (i) participation in the Mergers is in the best interests of OTF II (in the case of OTF II Adviser) and OTF (in the case of OTF Adviser), as applicable, and (ii) the interests of existing stockholders of OTF II and OTF will not be diluted (as provided under Rule 17a-8 of the Investment Company Act) as a result of the Mergers.
Best Interests and No Dilution. Each of CSL III Advisor (in the case of CSL III) and CGCIM (in the case of CSL) believes that (i) participation in the Mergers is in the best interests of each of CSL III (in the case of CSL III Advisor) and CSL (in the case of CGCIM) and (ii) the interests of existing shareholders of CSL III (in the case of CSL III Advisor) and CSL (in the case of CSL), as applicable, will not be diluted (as provided under Rule 17a-8 of the Investment Company Act) as a result of the Mergers.
Best Interests and No Dilution. Each of OBDC Adviser (in the case of OBDC) and OBDE Adviser (in the case of OBDE) believes that (i) participation in the Mergers is in the best interests of OBDE (in the case of OBDE Adviser) and OBDC (in the case of OBDC Adviser), as applicable, and (ii) the interests of existing stockholders of OBDE and OBDC will not be diluted (as provided under Rule 17a-8 of the Investment Company Act) as a result of the Mergers.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Best Interests and No Dilution. OFA believes that (i) participation in the Mergers is in the best interests of each of OCSI and OCSL and (ii) the interests of existing stockholders of OCSI and OCSL will not be diluted as a result of the Mergers.
Best Interests and No Dilution. SCP believes that (i) participation in the Mergers is in the best interests of each of SUNS and SLRC and (ii) the interests of existing stockholders of SUNS and SLRC will not be diluted as a result of the Mergers.
Best Interests and No Dilution. The Joint Advisor believes that (i) participating in the Mergers is in the best interests of each of FSK and FSKR and (ii) the interests of existing stockholders of FSK and FSKR will not be diluted as a result of the Mergers.
Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!