Common use of Carrier Selection Disputes Clause in Contracts

Carrier Selection Disputes. If any disputes should occur concerning the selection of primary LECs by the Customers of a Party, the following dispute escalation procedures shall be followed: (a) If a Customer denies authorizing a change in his or her primary local exchange carrier selection to a different LEC (“Unauthorized Switching”), SBC-AMERITECH shall switch that Customer back to CLEC in accordance with the terms of Michigan Bell Telephone Company Tariff, MPSC #20R, Part 22 (Resale Local Exchange Services) (the “Resale Tariff”). However, in the case of unauthorized changes of CLEC Customers to SBC-AMERITECH, SBC- AMERITECH shall also have the duties of the “Carrier” as enumerated in such Resale Tariff, but will pay the $50 compensation, described in the Resale Tariff, to CLEC. On January 10, 2000, the Commission issued an order in Case No. U- 11900 adopting revised procedures for changing telecommunications service providers (“Anti-Slamming Procedures”) to be followed by all telecommunications service providers operating in the State of Michigan. The Parties will adhere to the requirements adopted by the Commission in its Case No. U-11900 with respect to the selection of primary LECs and primary Interexchange Carriers. (b) If SBC-AMERITECH reports or otherwise provides information on unauthorized primary LEC changes to the FCC, the Commission or any other governmental entity, SBC-AMERITECH agrees to report on CLEC unauthorized primary LEC changes separately from unauthorized presubscribed interexchange carrier (“PIC”) changes. (c) The Parties agree that in the event the Resale Tariff is withdrawn by SBC-AMERITECH or materially revised, they will promptly meet and negotiate in good faith a revised procedure for resolving carrier selection disputes. If the Parties are unable to agree upon such revised procedure within thirty (30) days of a Party’s request to commence the negotiations, the dispute resolution procedures set forth in Section 28.3 will be implemented.

Appears in 4 contracts

Samples: Resale Agreement, Resale Agreement, Resale Agreement

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Carrier Selection Disputes. If any disputes should occur concerning the selection of primary LECs local exchange carriers by the Customers of a Party, the following dispute escalation procedures shall be followed: (a) If a Customer of either Party or a customer of any other carrier denies authorizing a change in his or her primary local exchange carrier selection to a different LEC (“Unauthorized Switching”), SBC-AMERITECH Ameritech shall switch that Customer customer back to CLEC the authorized primary local exchange carrier in accordance with the terms of Michigan Bell Telephone Company Tariff, MPSC #20R, Part 22 (Resale Local Exchange Services) (the Resale Tariff”). However, in the case of unauthorized changes of CLEC Requesting Carrier Customers to SBC-AMERITECHAmeritech, SBC- AMERITECH Ameritech shall also have the duties of the “Carrier” as enumerated in such Resale Tariff, but will pay to Requesting Carrier the $50 compensation, Unauthorized Switching Charge described in the such Resale Tariff, to CLEC. On January 10, 2000, the Commission issued an order in Case No. U- 11900 adopting revised procedures for changing telecommunications service providers (“Anti-Slamming Procedures”) to be followed by all telecommunications service providers operating in the State of Michigan. The Parties will adhere to the requirements adopted by the Commission in its Case No. U-11900 with respect to the selection of primary LECs and primary Interexchange Carriers. (b) If SBC-AMERITECH Ameritech reports or otherwise provides information on unauthorized primary LEC local exchange carrier changes to the FCC, the Commission or any other governmental entity, SBC-AMERITECH Ameritech agrees to report on CLEC Requesting Carrier unauthorized primary LEC local exchange carrier changes separately from unauthorized presubscribed interexchange carrier (“PIC”) PIC changes. (c) The Parties agree that in the event the Resale Tariff is withdrawn by SBC-AMERITECH Ameritech or materially revised, they will promptly meet and negotiate in good faith a revised procedure for resolving carrier selection disputes. If the Parties are unable to agree upon such revised procedure within thirty (30) days of a Party’s 's request to commence the negotiations, the dispute resolution procedures set forth in Section 28.3 will be implemented.

Appears in 2 contracts

Samples: Interconnection Agreement, Interconnection Agreement

Carrier Selection Disputes. If any disputes should occur concerning the selection of primary LECs by the Customers of a Party, the following dispute escalation procedures shall be followed: (a) If a Customer denies authorizing a change in his or her primary local exchange carrier selection to a different LEC (“Unauthorized Unauthor ized Switching”), SBC-AMERITECH shall switch that Customer back to CLEC AT&T in accordance with the terms of Michigan Bell Xxxx Telephone Company Tariff, MPSC #20R, Part 22 (Resale Local Exchange Services) (the “Resale TariffTar iff”). However, in the case of unauthorized changes of CLEC AT&T Customers to SBC-AMERITECH, SBC- AMERITECH shall also have the duties of the “Carrier” as enumerated in such Resale Tariff, but will pay the $50 compensation, described in the Resale Tariff, to CLEC. AT&T. On January 10, 2000, the Commission issued an order in Case NoXxxx Xx. U- 11900 X- 00000 adopting revised procedures for changing telecommunications service providers (“Anti-Slamming ProceduresProcedur es”) to be followed by all telecommunications service providers operating in the State of Michigan. The Parties will adhere to the requirements adopted by the Commission in its Case No. U-11900 with respect to the selection of primary LECs and primary Interexchange Carriers. (b) If SBC-AMERITECH reports or otherwise provides information on unauthorized primary LEC changes to the FCC, the Commission or any other governmental entity, SBC-AMERITECH agrees to report on CLEC AT&T unauthorized primary LEC changes separately from unauthorized presubscribed interexchange carrier (“PIC”) changes. (c) The Parties agree that in the event the Resale Tariff is withdrawn by SBC-AMERITECH or materially revised, they will promptly meet and negotiate in good faith a revised procedure for resolving carrier selection disputes. If the Parties are unable to agree upon such revised procedure within thirty (30) days of a Party’s request to commence the negotiations, the dispute resolution procedures set forth in Section 28.3 will be implemented.Section

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Interconnection Agreement

Carrier Selection Disputes. If any disputes should occur -------------------------- concerning the selection of primary LECs local exchange carriers by the Customers of a Party, the following dispute escalation procedures shall be followed: (a) If a Customer denies authorizing a change in his or her primary local exchange carrier selection to a different LEC (“Unauthorized Switching”"UNAUTHORIZED SWITCHING"), SBC-AMERITECH Ameritech shall switch that Customer back to CLEC Focal in accordance with the terms of Michigan Bell Xxxx Telephone Company Tariff, MPSC #20R, Part 22 (Resale Local Exchange Services) (the “Resale Tariff”"RESALE TARIFF"). However, in the case of unauthorized changes of CLEC Focal Customers to SBC-AMERITECHAmeritech, SBC- AMERITECH Ameritech shall also have the duties of the "Carrier" as enumerated in such Resale Tariff, but will pay the $50 compensation, described in the Resale Tariff, to CLEC. On January 10, 2000, the Commission issued an order in Case No. U- 11900 adopting revised procedures for changing telecommunications service providers (“Anti-Slamming Procedures”) to be followed by all telecommunications service providers operating in the State of Michigan. The Parties will adhere to the requirements adopted by the Commission in its Case No. U-11900 with respect to the selection of primary LECs and primary Interexchange CarriersFocal. (b) If SBC-AMERITECH Ameritech reports or otherwise provides information on unauthorized primary LEC local exchange carrier changes to the FCC, the Commission or any other governmental entity, SBC-AMERITECH Ameritech agrees to report on CLEC Focal unauthorized primary LEC local exchange carrier changes separately from unauthorized presubscribed interexchange carrier (“PIC”) PIC changes. (c) The Parties agree that in the event the Resale Tariff is withdrawn by SBC-AMERITECH Ameritech or materially revised, they will promptly meet and negotiate in good faith a revised procedure for resolving carrier selection disputes. If the Parties are unable to agree upon such revised procedure within thirty (30) days of a Party’s 's request to commence the negotiations, the dispute resolution procedures set forth in Section SECTION 28.3 will be ------------ implemented.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Interconnection Agreement (Focal Communications Corp)

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Carrier Selection Disputes. If any disputes should occur concerning the selection of primary LECs local exchange carriers by the Customers of a Party, the following dispute escalation procedures shall be followed: (aA) If a Customer denies authorizing a change in his or her primary local exchange carrier selection to a different LEC ("Unauthorized Switching"), SBC-AMERITECH Ameritech shall switch that Customer back to CLEC 21st Century in accordance with Applicable Law, including the terms of Michigan Bell Telephone Company Tariff, MPSC #20RILL. C.C. No. 20, Part 22 (Resale Local Exchange Services) (the "Resale Tariff"). However, in the case of unauthorized changes of CLEC 21st Century Customers to SBC-AMERITECHAmeritech, SBC- AMERITECH Ameritech shall also have the duties of the "Carrier", as enumerated in such Resale Tariff, but will pay the $50 compensation, as described in the Resale Tariff, to CLEC. On January 10, 2000, the Commission issued an order in Case No. U- 11900 adopting revised procedures for changing telecommunications service providers (“Anti-Slamming Procedures”) to be followed by all telecommunications service providers operating in the State of Michigan. The Parties will adhere to the requirements adopted by the Commission in its Case No. U-11900 with respect to the selection of primary LECs and primary Interexchange Carriers21st Century. (bB) If SBC-AMERITECH Ameritech reports or otherwise provides information on unauthorized primary LEC local exchange carrier changes to the FCC, the Commission or any other governmental entity, SBC-AMERITECH Ameritech agrees to report on CLEC 21st Century unauthorized primary LEC local exchange carrier changes separately from unauthorized presubscribed interexchange carrier (“PIC”) PIC changes. (cC) The Parties agree that in the event that either (i) the Resale Tariff is withdrawn by SBC-AMERITECH Ameritech or materially revisedrevised or (ii) there is no other Applicable Law relating to Local Exchange Carrier selection disputes, they will promptly meet and negotiate in good faith a revised procedure for resolving carrier selection disputes. If the Parties are unable to agree upon such revised procedure within thirty (30) days of a Party’s 's request to commence the negotiations, the dispute resolution procedures set forth in Section 28.3 will be implemented.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Interconnection Agreement (21st Century Telecom Group Inc)

Carrier Selection Disputes. If any disputes should occur concerning the selection of primary LECs by the Customers of a Party, the following dispute escalation procedures shall be followed: (a) If a Customer denies authorizing a change in his or her primary local exchange carrier selection to a different LEC (“Unauthorized Switching”), SBC-AMERITECH shall switch that Customer back to CLEC AT&T in accordance with the terms of Michigan Bell Telephone Company Tariff, MPSC #20R, Part 22 (Resale Local Exchange Services) (the “Resale Tariff”). However, in the case of unauthorized changes of CLEC AT&T Customers to SBC-AMERITECH, SBC- AMERITECH shall also have the duties of the “Carrier” as enumerated in such Resale Tariff, but will pay the $50 compensation, described in the Resale Tariff, to CLEC. AT&T. On January 10, 2000, the Commission issued an order in Case No. U- 11900 adopting revised procedures for changing telecommunications service providers (“Anti-Slamming Procedures”) to be followed by all telecommunications service providers operating in the State of Michigan. The Parties will adhere to the requirements adopted by the Commission in its Case No. U-11900 with respect to the selection of primary LECs and primary Interexchange Carriers. (b) If SBC-AMERITECH reports or otherwise provides information on unauthorized primary LEC changes to the FCC, the Commission or any other governmental entity, SBC-AMERITECH agrees to report on CLEC AT&T unauthorized primary LEC changes separately from unauthorized presubscribed interexchange carrier (“PIC”) changes. (c) The Parties agree that in the event the Resale Tariff is withdrawn by SBC-AMERITECH or materially revised, they will promptly meet and negotiate in good faith a revised procedure for resolving carrier selection disputes. If the Parties are unable to agree upon such revised procedure within thirty (30) days of a Party’s request to commence the negotiations, the dispute resolution procedures set forth in Section 28.3 will be implemented.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Interconnection Agreement

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!