Case Study Design. The research adopted a comparative case study approach (Xxx, 1994). Data were collected from a total of 23 construction projects, 10 in Australia/New Zealand and 13 in the United States of America. For each project, features of work were purposefully identified by project participants in consultation with the research team. Features of work were selected as the unit of analysis because they presented a particular health and safety problem or challenge. “Features of work were selected as the unit of analysis because they presented a particular health and safety problem or challenge.” For each feature of work, comprehensive data was collected to capture decisions that were made in relation to the design of the feature of work, the process by which it was to be constructed and the way that health and safety hazards were to be addressed. Data were collected by conducting
Appears in 10 contracts
Samples: icsafe.mlsoc.vt.edu, icsafe.mlsoc.vt.edu, icsafe.mlsoc.vt.edu
Case Study Design. The research adopted a comparative case study approach (XxxYin, 1994). Data were collected from a total of 23 construction projects, 10 in Australia/New Zealand and 13 in the United States of America. For each project, features of work were purposefully identified by project participants in consultation with the research team. Features of work were selected as the unit of analysis because they presented a particular health and safety problem or challenge. “Features of work were selected as the unit of analysis because they presented a particular health and safety problem or challenge.” For each feature of work, comprehensive data was collected to capture decisions that were made in relation to the design of the feature of work, the process by which it was to be constructed and the way that health and safety hazards were to be addressed. Data were collected by conducting
Appears in 4 contracts
Samples: icsafe.mlsoc.vt.edu, icsafe.mlsoc.vt.edu, icsafe.mlsoc.vt.edu