Conclusions for sharing patterns analysis Sample Clauses

Conclusions for sharing patterns analysis. On average, about 75% of the blocks accesses and from 35% to 40% of blocks/pages (depending on the granularity) on the analyzed applications correspond to instruction blocks, which, unlike data blocks, do not require coherence maintenance. Moreover, despite the fact that it is detected a high sharing degree of data blocks among cores, indeed only SW blocks (just 40% of the total number of data blocks) require coherence. Considering accesses, SW blocks agglutinate 60%, on average, of the total number of accesses. That means that if snoopy-based coherence is used, the broadcast traffic reduction will be around 40%, while if directory-based coherence is used, then the benefits will increase. In order to ease data classification, different page granularity degrees can be used at the expense of causing a loss of accuracy due to block misclassification. We observed that in the case of block counting there is a high misclassification degree. As a counterpart, in the number of accesses the degradation of classifying block or pages is lower. Also, it is observed that SW blocks are not spread over all the pages, but they are indeed distributed between a limited number of pages. In particular, less than 40% of data pages require coherence. Deeping inside SW pages, we observe that they hardly are populated, containing about 30% and 10% of blocks, on average, for 4KB and 64KB pages, respectively. Among them, the number of SW blocks is the majority. Furthermore, about 30% of the accesses to blocks of SW pages correspond to store operations. Finally, it is observed that the impact of the producer-consumer sharing pattern in the analyzed applications is negligible. Less than 1,5% of the blocks accessed in SW pages present such a behavior, which discourages the application of update policies for coherence purposes in an extensive way. Further discussion must be done in order to decide which can be the best options among all the coherence protocols in the literature, taking into account also the characteristics of the target system of the study. As aforementioned, the impact of producer-consumer pattern is insignificant and therefore an invalidation-based protocol would be the best choice, which also will reduce the amount of cache-to-cache traffic and consequently reduce the amount of cache bandwidth and energy consumption. As seen on the analysis results, we found that for page granularities most blocks and accesses are classified as SW and, therefore, it may not be suita...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Conclusions for sharing patterns analysis

  • Motions for Directions (1) Class Counsel or the Settling Defendants may apply to the Ontario Court and/or such other courts as may be required by the Courts for directions in respect of the interpretation, implementation and administration of this Settlement Agreement. Unless the Courts order otherwise, motions for directions that do not relate specifically to the matters affecting the Quebec Action shall be determined by the Ontario Court. (2) All motions contemplated by this Settlement Agreement shall be on notice to the Parties.

  • Errors, Questions, and Complaints a. In case of errors or questions about your transactions, you should as soon as possible contact us as set forth in Section 6 of the General Terms above. b. If you think your periodic statement for your account is incorrect or you need more information about a transaction listed in the periodic statement for your account, we must hear from you no later than sixty (60) days after we send you the applicable periodic statement for your account that identifies the error. You must: 1. Tell us your name; 2. Describe the error or the transaction in question, and explain as clearly as possible why you believe it is an error or why you need more information; and, 3. Tell us the dollar amount of the suspected error. c. If you tell us orally, we may require that you send your complaint in writing within ten (10) Business Days after your oral notification. Except as described below, we will determine whether an error occurred within ten (10) Business Days after you notify us of the error. We will tell you the results of our investigation within three (3) Business Days after we complete our investigation of the error, and will correct any error promptly. However, if we require more time to confirm the nature of your complaint or question, we reserve the right to take up to forty-five (45) days to complete our investigation. If we decide to do this, we will provisionally credit your Eligible Transaction Account within ten (10) Business Days for the amount you think is in error. If we ask you to submit your complaint or question in writing and we do not receive it within ten (10) Business Days, we may not provisionally credit your Eligible Transaction Account. If it is determined there was no error we will mail you a written explanation within three (3) Business Days after completion of our investigation. You may ask for copies of documents used in our investigation. We may revoke any provisional credit provided to you if we find an error did not occur.

  • Packing Materials and Containers for Shipment Packing materials and containers in which the good is packed for shipment shall be disregarded in determining whether-- (i) the non-originating materials used in the production of the good undergo an applicable change in tariff classification set out in subdivision (t) of this note; and (ii) the good satisfies a regional value-content requirement.

  • Technology Research Analyst Job# 1810 General Characteristics

  • Packaging Materials and Containers for Retail Sale 1. When packaging materials and containers in which a good is packaged for retail sales are classified in the Harmonized System with the good, they shall not be taken into account in determining whether all non-originating materials used in the production of the good undergo the applicable change in tariff classification set out in Annex 4.03. 2. When the good is subject to a requirement of regional value content, the value of these packaging materials and containers shall be taken into account as originating or non-originating materials, as the case may be, in calculating the regional value content of the good.

  • Solicitations for Subcontracts, Including Procurement of Materials and Equipment In all solicitations either by competitive bidding or negotiation made by the Local Government for work to be performed under a subcontract, including procurement of materials or leases of equipment, each potential subcontractor or supplier will be notified by the Local Government of the Local Government’s obligations under this Agreement and the Acts and Regulations relative to Nondiscrimination on the grounds of race, color, or national origin.

  • Complete Copies of Materials The Company has delivered or made available true and complete copies of each document (or summaries of same) that has been requested by Parent or its counsel.

  • Commercialization Reports Throughout the term of this Agreement and during the Sell-Off Period, and within thirty (30) days of December 31st of each year, Company will deliver to University written reports of Company’s and Sublicensees’ efforts and plans to develop and commercialize the innovations covered by the Licensed Rights and to make and sell Licensed Products. Company will have no obligation to prepare commercialization reports in years where (a) Company delivers to University a written Sales Report with active sales, and (b) Company has fulfilled all Performance Milestones. In relation to each of the Performance Milestones each commercialization report will include sufficient information to demonstrate achievement of those Performance Milestones and will set out timeframes and plans for achieving those Performance Milestones which have not yet been met.

  • CERTIFICATION OF NO ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIALS OR WORK 8.1 The Contractor shall be responsible for ensuring that no asbestos containing materials or work is included within the scope of the Work. The Contractor shall take whatever measures it deems necessary to insure that all employees, suppliers, fabricators, material men, subcontractors, or their assigns, comply with this requirement. 8.2 The Contractor shall ensure that Texas Department of Health licensed individuals, consultants or companies are used for any required asbestos work including asbestos inspection, asbestos abatement plans/specifications, asbestos abatement, asbestos project management and third-party asbestos monitoring.

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order. (b) The technical evaluation committee may call the responsive bidders for discussion or presentation to facilitate and assess their understanding of the scope of work and its execution. However, the committee shall have sole discretion to call for discussion / presentation. (c) Financial bids of only those bidders who qualify the technical criteria will be opened provided all other requirements are fulfilled. (d) AIIMS Jodhpur shall have right to accept or reject any or all tenders without assigning any reasons thereof.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!