Common use of CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Clause in Contracts

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW. The Commission, under the provisions of Section 252(e)(1) of the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996,4 is required to review negotiated interconnection agree- ments. It may only reject a negotiated agreement upon a finding that its implementation would be discriminatory to a nonparty or inconsistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity.5 Based upon its review of the Agreement between CenturyLink and Onvoy and its findings of fact, the Commission concludes the Agreement is neither discriminatory nor inconsistent with the public interest and shall be approved.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW. The Commission, under the provisions of Section 252(e)(1) of the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996,4 is required to review negotiated interconnection agree- ments. It may only reject a negotiated agreement upon a finding that its implementation would be discriminatory to a nonparty or inconsistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity.5 Based upon its review of the Agreement between CenturyLink and Onvoy Comcast and its findings of fact, the Commission concludes that the Agreement is neither discriminatory nor inconsistent with the public interest and shall be approved.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW. The Commission, under the provisions of Section 252(e)(1) of the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996,4 is required to review negotiated interconnection agree- mentsagreements. It may only reject a negotiated agreement upon a finding that its implementation implementa- tion would be discriminatory to a nonparty or inconsistent with the public interest, convenience conven- ience and necessity.5 Based upon its review of the Agreement amendments to the agreement between CenturyLink and Onvoy and its findings of fact, the Commission concludes that the Agreement agreement as amended is neither discriminatory nor inconsistent with the public interest and shall be approved.