Common use of Consequences for Non-Compliance Clause in Contracts

Consequences for Non-Compliance. If the Department has reason to believe that the District is not in substantial compliance with one or more of the statutory or regulatory requirements applicable to the District, the Department shall notify the District that it has ninety (90) days after the date of notice to come into compliance. If, at the end of the ninety-day period, the Department finds the District is not substantially in compliance with the applicable statutory or regulatory requirements, meaning that the District has not yet taken the necessary measures to ensure that it meets the applicable legal requirements as soon as practicable, the District may be subject to the interventions specified in sections 00-00-000 through 00-00-000, C.R.S. If the District has failed to comply with the provisions of article 44 of title 22 or article 45 of title 22, the District does not remedy the noncompliance within ninety (90) days and loss of accreditation is required to protect the interests of the students and parents of students enrolled in the District public schools, the Department may recommend to the State Board that the State Board remove the District’s accreditation. If the Department determines that the District has substantially failed to meet requirements specified in this accreditation contract and that immediate action is required to protect the interests of the students and parents of students enrolled in the District’s public schools, the Department may lower the District’s accreditation category.

Consequences for Non-Compliance. If the Department has reason to believe that the District Institute is not in substantial compliance with one or more of the statutory or regulatory requirements applicable to the DistrictInstitute, the Department shall notify the District Institute that it has ninety (90) days after the date of notice to come into compliance. If, at the end of the ninety-day period, the Department finds the District Institute is not substantially in compliance with the applicable statutory or regulatory requirements, meaning that the District Institute has not yet taken the necessary measures to ensure that it meets the applicable legal requirements as soon as practicable, the District Institute may be subject to the interventions specified in sections 00-00-000 through 00-00-000, C.R.S. If the District Institute has failed to comply with the provisions of article 44 of title 22 or article 45 of title 22, the District Institute does not remedy the noncompliance within ninety (90) days and loss of accreditation is required to protect the interests of the students and parents of students enrolled in the District Institute public schools, the Department may recommend to the State Board that the State Board remove the DistrictInstitute’s accreditation. If the Department determines that the District Institute has substantially failed to meet requirements specified in this accreditation contract and that immediate action is required to protect the interests of the students and parents of students enrolled in the DistrictInstitute’s public schools, the Department may lower the DistrictInstitute’s accreditation category.