Common use of Contract Dispute Resolution Board Clause in Contracts

Contract Dispute Resolution Board. There shall be a Contract Dispute Resolution Board composed of: 1. the chief administrative law judge of the Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings (“OATH”) or his or her designated OATH administrative law judge, who shall act as chairperson, and may adopt operational procedures and issue such orders consistent with this Section as may be necessary in the execution of the CDRB’s functions, including, but not limited to, granting extensions of time to present or respond to submissions; 2. the City Chief Procurement Officer (“CCPO”) or his or her designee; any designee shall have the requisite background to consider and resolve the merits of the dispute and shall not have participated personally and substantially in the particular matter that is the subject of the dispute or report to anyone who so participated; and 3. a person with appropriate expertise who is not an employee of the City. This person shall be selected by the presiding administrative law judge from a prequalified panel of individuals, established, and administered by OATH, with appropriate background to act as decision-makers in a dispute. Such individuals may not have a contract or dispute with the City or be an officer or employee of any company or organization that does, or regularly represent persons, companies, or organizations having disputes with the City.

Contract Dispute Resolution Board. There shall be a Contract Dispute Resolution Board composed of: 160.6.1. the The chief administrative law judge of the Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings (“OATH”) or his or his/her designated OATH administrative law judge, who shall act as chairperson, and may adopt operational procedures and issue such orders consistent with this Section Article as may be necessary in the execution of the CDRBContract Dispute Resolution Board’s functions, including, but not limited to, granting extensions of time to present or respond to submissions; 260.6.2. the City Chief Procurement Officer (“CCPO”) The CCPO or his or his/her designee; any designee shall have the requisite background to consider and resolve the merits of the dispute and shall not have participated personally and substantially in the particular matter that is the subject of the dispute or report to anyone who so participated; and 360.6.3. a A person with appropriate expertise who is not an employee of the City. This person shall be selected by the presiding administrative law judge from a prequalified panel of individuals, established, established and administered by OATH, OATH with appropriate background to act as decision-makers in a dispute. Such individuals individual may not have a contract or dispute with the City or be an officer or employee of any company or organization that does, or regularly represent represents persons, companies, or organizations having disputes with the City.

Contract Dispute Resolution Board. There shall be a Contract Dispute Resolution Board composed of: 1. the 27.6.1 The chief administrative law judge of the Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings (“OATH”) or his or his/her designated OATH administrative law judge, who shall act as chairperson, and may adopt operational procedures and issue such orders consistent with this Section Article 27 as may be necessary in the execution of the CDRBContract Dispute Resolution Board’s functions, including, but not limited to, granting extensions of time to present or respond to submissions; 2. the City Chief Procurement Officer (“CCPO”) 27.6.2 The CCPO or his or his/her designee; any designee shall have the requisite background to consider and resolve the merits of the dispute and shall not have participated personally and substantially in the particular matter that is the subject of the dispute or report to anyone who so participated; and 3. a 27.6.3 A person with appropriate expertise who is not an employee of the City. This person shall be selected by the presiding administrative law judge from a prequalified panel of individuals, established, established and administered by OATH, OATH with appropriate background to act as decision-makers in a dispute. Such individuals individual may not have a contract or dispute with the City or be an officer or employee of any company or organization that does, or regularly represent represents persons, companies, or organizations having disputes with the City.

Contract Dispute Resolution Board. There shall be a Contract Dispute Resolution Board composed of: 151.6.1. the The chief administrative law judge of the Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings (“OATH”) or his or his/her designated OATH administrative law judge, who shall act as chairperson, and may adopt operational procedures and issue such orders consistent with this Section Article as may be necessary in the execution of the CDRBContract Dispute Resolution Board’s functions, including, but not limited to, granting extensions of time to present or respond to submissions; 251.6.1.1. the City Chief Procurement Officer (“CCPO”) The CCPO or his or his/her designee; any designee shall have the requisite background to consider and resolve the merits of the dispute and shall not have participated personally and substantially in the particular matter that is the subject of the dispute or report to anyone who so participated; and 351.6.2. a A person with appropriate expertise who is not an employee of the City. This person shall be selected by the presiding administrative law judge from a prequalified panel of individuals, established, established and administered by OATH, OATH with appropriate background to act as decision-makers in a dispute. Such individuals individual may not have a contract or dispute with the City or be an officer or employee of any company or organization that does, or regularly represent represents persons, companies, or organizations having disputes with the City.

Contract Dispute Resolution Board. There shall be a Contract Dispute Resolution Board composed of: 127.6.1. the The chief administrative law judge of the Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings (“OATH”) or his or his/her designated OATH administrative law judge, who shall act as chairperson, and may adopt operational procedures and issue such orders consistent with this Section Article 27 as may be necessary in the execution of the CDRBContract Dispute Resolution Board’s functions, including, but not limited to, granting extensions of time to present or respond to submissions; 227.6.2. the City Chief Procurement Officer (“CCPO”) The CCPO or his or his/her designee; any designee shall have the requisite background to consider and resolve the merits of the dispute and shall not have participated personally and substantially in the particular matter that is the subject of the dispute or report to anyone who so participated; and 327.6.3. a A person with appropriate expertise who is not an employee of the City. This person shall be selected by the presiding administrative law judge from a prequalified panel of individuals, established, established and administered by OATH, OATH with appropriate background to act as decision-makers in a dispute. Such individuals individual may not have a contract or dispute with the City or be an officer or employee of any company or organization that does, or regularly represent represents persons, companies, or organizations having disputes with the City.

Contract Dispute Resolution Board. There shall be a Contract Dispute Resolution Board composed of: 160.6.1. the The chief administrative law judge of the Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings (“OATH”) or his or his/her designated OATH administrative law judge, who shall act as chairperson, and may adopt operational procedures and issue such orders consistent with this Section Article 60 as may be necessary in the execution of the CDRBContract Dispute Resolution Board’s functions, including, but not limited to, granting extensions of time to present or respond to submissions; 260.6.2. the City Chief Procurement Officer (“CCPO”) The CCPO or his or his/her designee; any designee shall have the requisite background to consider and resolve the merits of the dispute and shall not have participated personally and substantially in the particular matter that is the subject of the dispute or report to anyone who so participated; and 360.6.3. a A person with appropriate expertise who is not an employee of the City. This person shall be selected by the presiding administrative law judge from a prequalified panel of individuals, established, established and administered by OATH, OATH with appropriate background to act as decision-makers in a dispute. Such individuals individual may not have a contract or dispute with the City or be an officer or employee of any company or organization that does, or regularly represent represents persons, companies, or organizations having disputes with the City.

Contract Dispute Resolution Board. There shall be a Contract Dispute Resolution Board composed of: 1. the chief administrative law judge of the Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings (“OATH”) or his or her designated OATH administrative law judge, who shall act as chairperson, and may adopt operational procedures and issue such orders consistent with this Section 12.03 as may be necessary in the execution of the CDRB’s functions, including, but not limited to, granting extensions of time to present or respond to submissions; 2. the City Chief Procurement Officer (“CCPO”) or his or her designee; any designee shall have the requisite background to consider and resolve the merits of the dispute and shall not have participated personally and substantially in the particular matter that is the subject of the dispute or report to anyone who so participated; and 3. a person with appropriate expertise who is not an employee of the City. This person shall be selected by the presiding administrative law judge from a prequalified panel of individuals, established, and administered by OATH, with appropriate background to act as decision-makers in a dispute. Such individuals may not have a contract or dispute with the City or be an officer or employee of any company or organization that does, or regularly represent persons, companies, or organizations having disputes with the City.

Contract Dispute Resolution Board. There shall be a Contract Dispute Resolution Board composed of: 160.6.1. the The chief administrative law judge of the Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings (“OATH”) or his or his/her designated OATH administrative law judge, who shall act as chairperson, and may adopt operational procedures and issue such orders consistent with this Section Article as may be necessary in the execution of the CDRBContract Dispute Resolution Board’s functions, including, but not limited to, granting extensions of time to present or respond to submissions; 260.6.1.1. the City Chief Procurement Officer (“CCPO”) The CCPO or his or his/her designee; any designee shall have the requisite background to consider and resolve the merits of the dispute and shall not have participated personally and substantially in the particular matter that is the subject of the dispute or report to anyone who so participated; and 360.6.2. a A person with appropriate expertise who is not an employee of the City. This person shall be selected by the presiding administrative law judge from a prequalified panel of individuals, established, established and administered by OATH, OATH with appropriate background to act as decision-makers in a dispute. Such individuals individual may not have a contract or dispute with the City or be an officer or employee of any company or organization that does, or regularly represent represents persons, companies, or organizations having disputes with the City.

Contract Dispute Resolution Board. There shall be a Contract Dispute Resolution Board composed of: 1. (a) the chief administrative law judge of the Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings (“OATH”) or his or his/her designated OATH administrative law judge, who shall act as chairperson, and may adopt operational procedures and issue such orders consistent with this Section section as may be necessary in the execution of the CDRB’s functions, including, but not limited to, granting extensions of time to present or respond to submissions; 2. (b) the City Chief Procurement Officer (“CCPO”) or his or his/her designee; any designee shall have the requisite background to consider and resolve the merits of the dispute and shall not have participated personally and substantially in the particular matter that is the subject of the dispute or report to anyone who so participated; participated , and 3. (c) a person with appropriate expertise who is not an employee of the City. This person shall be selected by the presiding administrative law judge from a prequalified panel of individuals, established, established and administered by OATH, with appropriate background to act as decision-makers in a dispute. Such individuals may not have a contract or dispute with the City or be an officer or employee of any company or organization that does, or regularly represent persons, companies, or organizations having disputes with the City.

Contract Dispute Resolution Board. There shall be a Contract Dispute Resolution Board composed of: 151.6.1. the The chief administrative law judge of the Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings (“OATH”) or his or his/her designated OATH administrative law judge, who shall act as chairperson, and may adopt operational procedures and issue such orders consistent with this Section Article 51 as may be necessary in the execution of the CDRBContract Dispute Resolution Board’s functions, including, but not limited to, granting extensions of time to present or respond to submissions; 251.6.2. the City Chief Procurement Officer (“CCPO”) The CCPO or his or his/her designee; any designee shall have the requisite background to consider and resolve the merits of the dispute and shall not have participated personally and substantially in the particular matter that is the subject of the dispute or report to anyone who so participated; and 351.6.3. a A person with appropriate expertise who is not an employee of the City. This person shall be selected by the presiding administrative law judge from a prequalified panel of individuals, established, established and administered by OATH, OATH with appropriate background to act as decision-makers in a dispute. Such individuals individual may not have a contract or dispute with the City or be an officer or employee of any company or organization that does, or regularly represent represents persons, companies, or organizations having disputes with the City.

Contract Dispute Resolution Board. There shall be a Contract Dispute Resolution Board composed of: 1. the chief administrative law judge of the Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings (“OATH”) or his or her designated OATH administrative law judge, who shall act as chairperson, and may adopt operational procedures and issue such orders consistent with this Section as may be necessary in the execution of the CDRB’s functions, including, but not limited to, granting extensions of time to present or respond to submissions; 2. the City Chief Procurement Officer (“CCPO”) or his or her designee; any designee shall have the requisite background to consider and resolve the merits of the dispute and shall not have participated personally and substantially in the particular matter that is the subject of the dispute or report to anyone who so participated; and 3. a person with appropriate expertise who is not an employee of the City. This person shall be selected by the presiding administrative law judge from a prequalified panel of individuals, established, and administered by OATH, with appropriate background to act as decision-makers decision‐makers in a dispute. Such individuals may not have a contract or dispute with the City or be an officer or employee of any company or organization that does, or regularly represent persons, companies, or organizations having disputes with the City.

Contract Dispute Resolution Board. There shall be a Contract Dispute Resolution Board composed of: 1. the chief administrative law judge of the Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings (“OATH”) or his or her designated OATH administrative law judge, who shall act as chairperson, and may adopt operational procedures and issue such orders consistent with this Section as may be necessary in the execution of the CDRB’s functions, including, but not limited to, granting extensions of time to present or respond to submissions; 2. the City Chief Procurement Officer (“CCPO”) or his or her designee; any designee shall have the requisite background to consider and resolve the merits of the dispute and shall not have participated personally and substantially in the particular matter that is the subject of the dispute or report to anyone who so participated; and 3. a person with appropriate expertise who is not an employee of the City. This person shall be selected by the presiding administrative law judge from a prequalified panel of individuals, established, and administered by OATH, with appropriate background to act as decision-decision‐ makers in a dispute. Such individuals may not have a contract or dispute with the City or be an officer or employee of any company or organization that does, or regularly represent persons, companies, or organizations having disputes with the City.

Contract Dispute Resolution Board. There shall be a Contract Dispute Resolution Board composed of: 1. the (a) The chief administrative law judge of the Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings (“OATH”) or his or his/her designated OATH administrative law judge, who shall act as chairperson, and may adopt operational procedures and issue such orders consistent with this Section section as may be necessary in the execution of the CDRB’s functions, including, but not limited to, granting extensions of time to present or respond to submissions; 2. the (b) The City Chief Procurement Officer (“CCPO”) or his or his/her designee; any designee shall have the requisite background to consider and resolve the merits of the dispute and shall not have participated personally and substantially in the particular matter that is the subject of the dispute or report to anyone who so participated; , and 3. a (c) A person with appropriate expertise who is not an employee of the City. This person shall be selected by the presiding administrative law judge from a prequalified panel of individuals, established, established and administered by OATH, with appropriate background to act as decision-makers in a dispute. Such individuals may not have a contract or dispute with the City or be an officer or employee of any company or organization that does, or regularly represent persons, companies, or organizations having disputes with the City.