Coordination in Prosecution Sample Clauses
The Coordination in Prosecution clause establishes how parties will work together when pursuing legal action, such as enforcing intellectual property rights or addressing infringements. Typically, this clause outlines procedures for sharing information, making joint decisions, and allocating responsibilities during prosecution efforts, which may include who leads the action and how costs are divided. Its core function is to ensure that both parties act in a coordinated and efficient manner, minimizing conflicts and maximizing the effectiveness of legal proceedings.
Coordination in Prosecution. Notwithstanding Metagenomi’s right to Prosecute and Maintain the Metagenomi-Prosecuted Patent Rights, the Parties will, and will cause their Affiliates to, cooperate and implement reasonable patent filing and prosecution strategies (including filing divisionals, continuations or otherwise) so that, to the extent reasonably feasible, Product-Specific Patent Rights and other Licensed Patent Rights are pursued in mutually exclusive patent applications.
Coordination in Prosecution. Notwithstanding Biogen’s right to prepare, file, prosecute, and maintain the Biogen-Prosecuted Patent Rights or C4’s right to prepare, file, prosecute, and maintain the C4-Prosecuted Patent Rights, the Parties will, and will cause their Affiliates to, cooperate and implement reasonable patent filing and prosecution strategies (including filing divisionals, continuations or otherwise) so that, to the extent reasonably feasible Product-Specific Patent Rights, Target-Specific Patent Rights, and Collaboration Platform Patent Rights are pursued in mutually exclusive patent applications.
Coordination in Prosecution. Notwithstanding Biogen’s right to prepare, file, prosecute and maintain the Biogen-Prosecuted Patent Rights or Sangamo’s right to prepare, file, prosecute and maintain the Sangamo-Prosecuted Patent Rights, the Parties will, and will cause their Affiliates to, cooperate and implement reasonable patent filing and prosecution strategies (including filing divisionals, continuations or otherwise) so that, to the extent reasonably feasible [*] Patent Rights and [*] Patent Rights are pursued [*].
Coordination in Prosecution. Notwithstanding [***], the Parties will, and will cause their Affiliates to, cooperate and implement reasonable patent filing and prosecution strategies (including filing divisionals, continuations, strategically using terminal disclaimers to overcome obviousness type double patenting rejections, as necessary, in accordance with standard patent practice) to (a) ensure that patent coverage will protect Codiak Platform Research Know-How, the Loaded Construct Research Know-How, and the Sarepta Payload Research Know-How and (b) maximize the patent term of all Codiak Owned Research Patent Rights, Sarepta Owned Research Patent Rights, and Jointly Owned Research Patent Rights. Without limiting the foregoing, [***]. In furtherance of the foregoing, the Parties will, and will cause their Affiliates to, cooperate and implement reasonable patent filing and prosecution strategies (including filing divisionals, continuations, or otherwise) so that Loaded Construct Research Patent Rights, Sarepta Payload Research Patent Rights, and Codiak Platform Research Patent Rights are pursued in mutually exclusive patent applications.