Current Agreement Sample Clauses

Current Agreement. The Executive and the Company acknowledge that prior to the Effective Date, the Executive’s employment shall continue to be governed by the existing written agreement between the Executive and the Company. From and after the Effective Date, except as specifically provided herein, this Agreement shall supersede any other employment agreement between the parties.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Current Agreement. Executive Board; 07/23/2020
Current Agreement. 1. The Current Agreement will contain only the language that is in effect at present. 2. The Current Agreement will be available online to RASW members and administrators.
Current Agreement. The City is presently contracted with the following Contractor(s) to provide this service/product. A scan of the City's written agreement may be viewed online at xxxxx://xxx.xxxx.xxx/activity/city-and-county-contracts and searching for the contract number(s).
Current Agreement. All the terms and conditions of the existing collective bargaining Agreement shall continue in full force and effect, without resort to strike or lock-out until the expiration date of said Agreement, or the expiration of any mutually agreed upon extension.
Current Agreement. If any provisions of this BAA conflict with any of the terms of the Agreement or any other agreement between the parties, the terms of this BAA shall control. The current Agreement between the parties shall continue in full force and effect.
Current Agreement. Remainder of Article – Current Agreement
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Current Agreement. Unlike all of the previous Minnesota-Wisconsin tuition reciprocity agreements, the current agree- ment does not include an expiration date. Rather, the agreement is automatically renewed each year unless terminated or modified with the consent of both states. However, proposed changes to the agreement must be approved by the Joint Commit- tee on Finance. At the time of renewal, the most significant changes made to the agreement, which first ap- plied to reciprocity studen ts enrolled in the 1998-99 academic year, were due in large part to two fac- tors. Since, historically, resident tuition at Minne- sota institutions was generally higher than at Wis- consin institutions, Wisconsin residents attending Minnesota institutions under the agreement paid lower tuition than Minnesota residents attending the same institution. This situation proved awk- xxxx for Minnesota and for a number of years, that state sought to increase tuition rates paid by Wis- consin residents attending Minnesota institutions in order to reduce the tuition differential. While Wisconsin had been opposed to such increases in the past, as its liability obligation increased, finally resulting in a payment to Minnesota in December of 1996, Wisconsin negotiators began to consider higher tuition for Wisconsin residents attending Minnesota schools in order to reduce the state's payment to Minnesota. Negotiations for the renewal of the current agreement, which began in the fall of 1995, were carried out by a group of representatives from each state. In Wisconsin, this group consisted of repre- sentatives from the UW System, HEAB, Wisconsin Technical College System (WTCS) and the Depart- ment of Administration (DOA). While the agree- ment is not included in the Minnesota statutes, Wisconsin law specifies that the agreement is sub- ject to the approval of the Joint Committee on Fi- xxxxx. The Committee approved the proposed agreement, with some modifications, in August of 1997. However, legislation was required to codify some of the changes that were approved by the Committee. These statutory modifications were accomplished in 1997 Act 200. Prior to 1998-99, the reciprocity tuition rate paid by a participating student was defined in the stat- utes as "the average academic fee that would be charged the student at a comparable public institu- tion of higher education located in his or her state of residence, as specified in the agreement." Act 200 modified the statutes to require that the agreement e...
Current Agreement. 2.1 This PA sets forth the terms under which TFS shall manage the K-8 school at a facility located at 0000 Xxxxxxxx Xxxx, Xxxxx Xxxxx, XX 00000 while the school is under the jurisdiction of the RSD. 2.2 TFS shall provide educational services according to the educational standards established by law, and this Agreement; measure student progress toward stated goals; and participate in student assessments required by law, regulation, and BESE policy. TFS shall manage the school in a financially prudent manner and provide BESE and/or the LDE and/or the RSD with timely and accurate reporting. 2.3 TFS shall manage the school with oversight from the RSD, but TFS shall be responsible for all personnel, budget and curriculum decisions and implementations, except as otherwise provided in this Agreement. 2.4 This agreement shall be effective upon complete execution for an initial period of three (3) years to commence on July 1, 2023 and terminate on June 30, 2026. 2.5 TFS’s academic, organizational and financial performance shall be evaluated in conformity with standards set forth by RSD as outlined in section 5.2.5 and Appendix D of this agreement. TFS shall remain subject to any amendments to these standards subsequent to the execution of this PA.
Current Agreement. The Company and Employee entered into an employment agreement, effective as of August 1, 2005 (the “Agreement”).
Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!