Decision Making Structure Sample Clauses

Decision Making Structure. The Executive Council will make all final and substantive decisions regarding CORE3, and will be composed of Core Partners, Associate Partners, and Ex Officio seats. The Executive Council will strive for consensus. Exhibit A outlines the Decision Making Roles and Structure.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Decision Making Structure. The Executive Council will follow Xxxxxx’s Rules of Order procedures for decision making.
Decision Making Structure. 9.1 Agenda items will be discussed in a structured way. When background information is needed on an agenda item, the principal will provide SAC members with that information and the required time to review it in advance of decision making. 9.2 Wherever possible all decisions will be made by consensus. If a consensus cannot be reached, the decision will be delayed until the next meeting. During this time, there will be consultation and discussion with the appropriate partners and information brought back to the next meeting. 9.3 If consensus still is not reached at the next SAC meeting, then a vote will be taken with majority being required for acceptance. If there is not a majority, then no advice is given to the principal or Regional Centre for Education. 9.4 All decisions and recommendations will be recorded in the Minutes of meetings. 9.5 All SAC members will support decisions of the SAC taken in the above manner. All SAC members are responsible for making decisions that ensure the best education possible for our students. 9.6 All SAC members in attendance at a meeting will have the opportunity to participate in decision-making. If a member is not in attendance for a meeting, decisions made at that meeting are still valid provided there was a quorum. 9.7 Membership disputes which cannot be resolved at the local level will be referred to the HRCE for advice/or mediation as requested. The EECD will provide advice/or mediation as requested.
Decision Making Structure. Decisions regarding the actions of CSTAC including decisions regarding which projects to pursue and fund, will be made by a committee made up of one (1) designated staff representative from each CSTAC Agency. This body of CSTAC Agency staff representatives shall be referred to as the “Committee.” Each designated representative will have the authority to vote on behalf of that Agency, and one or more designated alternates will have the authority to vote on behalf of that Agency when the designated representative is absent or in the case of a conflict of interest. Each Agency shall have one (1) vote on the Committee. Except for voting on the annual budget, and special, unbudgeted, or outside projects, all other CSTAC decisions will require a minimum of a majority of affirmative votes by designated representatives or designated alternates of all CSTAC Agencies.

Related to Decision Making Structure

  • Management Structure Describe the overall management approach toward planning and implementing the contract. Include an organization chart for the management of the contract, if awarded.

  • Agreement Structure This Agreement includes Part 1 - General Terms, Part 2 - Country-unique Terms (if any), the LI, and the XxX and is the complete agreement between Licensee and Lenovo regarding the use of the Program. It replaces any prior oral or written communications between Licensee and Lenovo concerning Licensee’s use of the Program. The terms of Part 2 may replace or modify those of Part 1. To the extent of any conflict, the LI prevails over both Parts.

  • Alternative Structure If following the date of this Agreement all of the conditions set forth in Article VI have been satisfied or waived (except that the tax representation letters in the forms as set forth in Exhibit B-1 and called for in Section 5.14 cannot be delivered and the condition set forth in Section 6.1(e) has not been waived), but the Closing could occur if the tax representation letters in the forms set forth in Exhibit B-2 could be executed and delivered (assuming Parent alters the structure as hereafter provided in this Section 1.1(b)), Parent shall alter the structure of the business combination between Merger Sub and the Company contemplated by this Agreement, , by consummating a second-step merger of the Surviving Corporation into a limited liability company wholly-owned by Parent that is disregarded as an entity for federal tax purposes, in accordance with Delaware Law, immediately following the Merger (such second-step merger, the “Second Merger”); provided, however, that (i) such wholly-owned disregarded limited liability company shall become a party to, and shall become bound by, the terms of this Agreement and (ii) the tax representation letters in the forms set forth in Exhibit B-2 shall be executed and delivered, and (iii) any action taken pursuant to this Section 1.1(b) shall not (unless consented to in writing by the Company prior to the Closing) (x) alter or change the kind or amount of consideration to be issued to the holders of the Company’s capital stock or other securities as provided for in this Agreement or (y) otherwise cause any closing condition set forth in Article VI not to be capable of being satisfied (unless duly waived by the party entitled to the benefits thereof). If such second-step merger occurs, references to the Merger in Recital I, Section 1.10, Section 2.6(b)(xiii), Section 4.1(b)(xviii), Section 5.14 and Section 6.1(e) shall be to the Merger and the second-step merger described in this Section 1.1(b), taken together as one integrated transaction for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

  • Master Feeder Structure If permitted by the 1940 Act, the Board of Trustees, by vote of a majority of the Trustees, and without a Shareholder vote, may cause the Trust or any one or more Series to convert to a master feeder structure (a structure in which a feeder fund invests all of its assets in a master fund, rather than making investments in securities directly) and thereby cause existing Series of the Trust to either become feeders in a master fund, or to become master funds in which other funds are feeders.

  • Payment Structure You must pay the fees listed on the relevant Services Order. Subscription payments will be structured differently based on the term you select from the three options below and the payment structure will be set forth in the Services Order. The fees identified in the Services Order are exclusive of shipping fees, and you will pay the shipping fees (if applicable) identified in the invoice.

  • Credit Structure If the PTD Service Level Standard is not met, it is a Service Issue and is considered a Service Restoration Priority 2. If the PTD metric for a pair of Customer Connections or Customer Sites is not being met, Customer may be eligible for a credit. To obtain a credit, a trouble ticket must be opened with Verizon when a PTD Service Level Standard is not being met or if a Service Issue is identified. Verizon will work with Customer to confirm that a PTD issue exists and repair the problem(s), as applicable. Once Verizon confirms that the PTD Service Level Standard is not being met, Verizon will have 30 calendar days to repair the Service to meet the PTD Service Level Standard and close the applicable trouble ticket, and in such an event, Customer will not be eligible for a credit. If, after 30 calendar days of opening the trouble ticket, the PTD Service Level Standard continues to not be met, Customer will qualify for a credit. Customer’s measurement of PTD prior to opening a trouble ticket may be considered by Verizon in determining the need to repair the Service. Packet Transit Delay (PTD) 20% 5.4.4.1 Service Issues occur between pair Ports of the Private IP Network. Consequently, two Customer connections will be impacted by each Service Issue. For Service Issue Service Level Standard credit purposes, the MRC will be defined as the average of the MRCs for each of the two impacted Customer Connections.

  • Governance Structure The Academy shall be organized and administered under the direction of the Academy Board and pursuant to the governance structure as set forth in its Bylaws. The Academy’s Board of Directors shall meet at least six times per fiscal year, unless another schedule is mutually agreed upon by the University President or Designee and the Academy.

  • Change in Structure Except as expressly permitted under Section 6.3, no Credit Party shall, and no Credit Party shall permit any of its Subsidiaries to, amend any of its Organization Documents in any respect materially adverse to Agent or Lenders.

  • PRICING STRUCTURES Licenses and Support Services for the Licensed Programs to which this OST applies are granted according to the pricing structures mentioned in the related Transaction Document. Standard pricing structures are defined in the section “DEFINITIONS” of this OST, even though those pricing structures may not be applicable to the DS Offerings to which this OST applies. Other pricing structures may be made available on a case by case basis.

  • Cost Responsibility for Interconnection Facilities and Distribution Upgrades 4.1 Interconnection Facilities 4.2 Distribution Upgrades

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!