Common use of Differentiating Disciplinary Misconduct from Criminal Offenses Clause in Contracts

Differentiating Disciplinary Misconduct from Criminal Offenses. School administrators and personnel are responsible for school discipline. Although SROs are expected to be familiar with the school division code of student conduct, the rules of individual schools, and their application in day-to-day practice, SROs should not be involved with the enforcement of school rules or disciplinary infractions that are not violations of law. Consequences of student misconduct should be effective, developmentally appropriate, and fair. Interventions and school sanctions should help students learn from their mistakes and address root causes of misconduct. School administrators should consider alternatives to suspensions and expulsions and law enforcement officials should consider alternatives to involvement with the juvenile and criminal justice systems for student violations of law.

Differentiating Disciplinary Misconduct from Criminal Offenses. School administrators and personnel are responsible for school discipline. Although SROs are expected to be familiar with the school division code of student conduct, conduct and the rules of individual schools, and their application in day-to-day practice, SROs should shall not be involved with the enforcement of school rules or disciplinary infractions that are not violations of law. Consequences of student misconduct should be effective, developmentally appropriate, and fair. Interventions and school sanctions should help students learn from their mistakes and address root causes of misconduct. School administrators should will consider alternatives to suspensions and expulsions and law law-enforcement officials should will consider alternatives when appropriate to involvement with the juvenile and criminal justice systems for student violations of law.

Differentiating Disciplinary Misconduct from Criminal Offenses. School administrators administrators, SSOs and personnel teachers are responsible for school discipline. Although SROs are expected to be familiar with the school division code of student conduct, the rules of individual schools, and their application in day-to-day practice, SROs should not be involved with the enforcement of school rules or disciplinary infractions that are not violations of lawoflaw. Consequences of student misconduct should be effective, developmentally appropriate, and �d fair. Interventions and school sanctions should help students learn from their mistakes and address root causes of misconductofmisconduct. School administrators should will consider alternatives to suspensions and expulsions and law enforcement officials should will consider alternatives to involvement with the referrals to juvenile court services and criminal justice systems arrests for student violations of law.

Differentiating Disciplinary Misconduct from Criminal Offenses. School administrators administrators, SSOs and personnel teachers are responsible for school discipline. Although SROs are expected to be familiar with the school division code of student conduct, the rules of individual schools, and their application in day-to-day day­to­day practice, SROs should not be involved with the enforcement of school rules or disciplinary infractions that are not violations of law. Consequences of student misconduct should be effective, developmentally appropriate, and fair. Interventions and school sanctions should help students learn from their mistakes and address root causes of misconduct. School administrators should will consider alternatives to suspensions and expulsions and law enforcement officials should will consider alternatives to involvement with the referrals to juvenile court services and criminal justice systems arrests for student violations of law.