DISPUTED PENALTIES Sample Clauses

DISPUTED PENALTIES. Any time penalties are assessed by the Contract Administrator against VENDOR pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, VENDOR may appeal the assessment of such penalties to the Director of Purchasing within ten (10) days after notice of the assessment pursuant to Article 9 of this Agreement. The appeal shall be in writing and VENDOR shall state the reasons why the penalties should be reduced or not assessed. If the appeal is not resolved by mutual agreement, the Director of Purchasing shall promptly issue a decision in writing, after consulting with the County Attorney's Office. The decision shall state the reasons for the action taken, and inform VENDOR of its right to administrative review. If VENDOR disagrees with the decision of the Director of Purchasing, it may seek administrative review by filing notice with the Director of Purchasing not later than ten (10) days after the decision of the Director of Purchasing. COUNTY and VENDOR agree that the hearing procedures shall be in accordance with the provisions of Section 21.120 of the Broward County Procurement Code, as may be amended from time to time.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
DISPUTED PENALTIES. Any time penalties are assessed by the Contract Administrator against PLAN pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, PLAN may appeal the assessment of such penalties to the Director of Purchasing within ten
Sample 1

Related to DISPUTED PENALTIES

  • Fines and Penalties Qwest shall be liable to pay to CLEC fines and penalties for resold services in accordance with the Commission's retail service requirements that apply to Qwest retail services, if any. Such credits shall be limited in accordance with the following: a) Qwest's fines and penalties paid to CLEC shall be subject to the wholesale discount; b) Qwest shall only be liable to provide fines and penalties in accordance with the resold services provided to CLEC. Qwest is not required to pay fines and penalties for service failures that are the fault of CLEC; c) Intentionally Left Blank. d) In no case shall Qwest's fines and penalties to CLEC exceed the amount Qwest would pay the Commission under the service quality plan, less any wholesale discount applicable to CLEC's resold services; and e) In no case shall Qwest be required to provide duplicate reimbursement or payment to CLEC for any service quality failure incident.

  • Payment Disputes We will not exercise Our rights under Section 6.3 (Overdue Charges) or 6.4 (Suspension of Service and Acceleration) above if You are disputing the applicable charges reasonably and in good faith and are cooperating diligently to resolve the dispute.

  • DISPUTE SETTLEMENT PROCEDURE A major objective of this Agreement is to eliminate lost time and/or production arising out of disputes or grievances. Disputes over any work related or industrial matter should be dealt with as close to its source as possible. Disputes over matters arising from this agreement shall be dealt with according to the following procedure. An employee or the union delegate or site xxxxxxx or Enterprise should initially submit any work related grievance and/or industrial matter to the site foreperson, supervisor or other appropriate site representative of the company or appropriate site union representative as relevant. If the matter remains unresolved the union delegate or site xxxxxxx may then submit the matter to the appropriate senior management person. Where relevant the Enterprise may submit the matter to a union official. If still not resolved the delegate or site xxxxxxx shall refer the matter to an appropriate official of the union, who shall discuss the matter with the nominated representative of the Enterprise. If still not resolved there may be discussions between the state secretary and senior management representative. Whilst the above procedures are being followed work should continue as normal. This procedure is to be followed in good faith and without unreasonable delay by any party. Should the matter remain unresolved and where the issue is within the jurisdiction of the Victorian Building Industry Disputes Board (“the Board”), either of the parties shall refer the dispute at first instance to the Board (which shall deal with the dispute in accordance with VBIA procedures and, where required, determine issues of jurisdiction). The Board’s decision will be accepted by all parties subject to the right of either party to refer the dispute to the Australian Industrial Relations Commission for conciliation and if required arbitration. The Commission’s decision will be accepted by all parties subject to legal rights of appeal. This dispute settlement procedure does not apply to health and safety issues or issues of industry, state or national significance.

  • - FINANCIAL PENALTIES By virtue of the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities, any beneficiary declared to be in grave breach of his obligations shall be liable to financial penalties of between 2% and 10% of the value of the grant in question, with due regard for the principle of proportionality. This rate may be increased to between 4% and 20% in the event of a repeated breach in the five years following the first. The beneficiary shall be notified in writing of any decision by the Commission to apply such financial penalties.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!