Dynamic Schedule Flows. Requirements: Each Party agrees to provide the other Party with the actual amount and future projection of dynamic schedule flows. All dynamic schedule flows and tags will be submitted in accordance with NERC reliability standards and NAESB business practices.
Dynamic Schedule Flows. Requirements: Each Party agrees to provide the other Party with the actual amount and future projection of dynamic schedule flows commencing no later than sixty (60) days from the signing of this Agreement. All dynamic schedule flows and tags will be submitted in accordance with NERC policy and procedures.
Dynamic Schedule Flows. Each Party will provide the other Party with the actual amount and future projection of dynamic schedule flows. All dynamic schedule flows and tags will be submitted in accordance with NERC policy and procedures.
Dynamic Schedule Flows. MAPPCOR and MISO shall provide each other with the actual amount and future projection of dynamic schedule flows. All dynamic schedule flows and tags will be submitted in accordance with NERC policy and procedures. ATTACHMENT B TO MAPPCOR-MISO SEAMS OPERATING AGREEMENT Congestion Management Process Version 4.1 1/31/05 Revision History Date Editor Version Summary of Changes 4/16/04 Xxxxx Xxxxx Draft 1 Initial draft 11/30/04 Xxx Xxxxxxxxx 4.1 Conform draft to current PJM-MISO CMP implementation practices and FERC Orders. 01/11/05 RFWG Changes for MAPPCOR-MISO SOA Executive Summary This is the initial version of the MAPPCOR /MISO Congestion Management Process document. It provides significant detail in the areas of Market Flow Calculation; Firm Gen-to-Load Flow determination; the Tagging of Import and Export transactions; and Flowgate determination and administration. These additional details are the result of multiple discussions between the members of the Reciprocal Flowgate Working Group, which is a working group reporting to the XXXX-MISO Seams Team and includes representatives of XXXX, MAPPCOR, XXXX members who are not also MISO Transmission Owners, the Midwest ISO, and the MISO Transmission Owners. As MISO implements its market, one of the primary seams issues that must be resolved is how different congestion management methodologies (market-based and traditional) will interact to ensure that parallel flows and impacts are recognized and controlled in a manner that consistently ensures system reliability. XXXX and MISO have actively worked with stakeholders in various forums in order to identify and address various concerns and issues. The proposed solution will greatly enhance current IDC granularity by utilizing existing real-time applications to monitor and react to Flowgates external to an Operating Entity’s market footprint. In brief, the process includes the following concepts: • Participating Operating Entities will agree to observe limits on an extensive list of coordinated external Flowgates • Like all Control Areas, Market-Based Operating Entities will have Firm Gen-to- Load Flows upon those Flowgates. • Market-Based Operating Entities will determine these Firm Gen-to-Load Flows using the published analysis process, and constrain their operations to limit Firm Gen-to-Load Flows on the Coordinated Flowgates to no more than the calculated Firm Gen-to-Load Limit established in the analysis. • In real-time, Market-Based Operating Entities will cal...
