Jurisdiction and Choice of Law This Agreement shall be construed according to English law and any disputes arising under it shall, subject to the provisions of clause 19 above, be determined in the English Courts.
Venue and Choice of Law In the event of litigation concerning this agreement, venue shall be in the First Judicial District, Xxxxx and Xxxxx County, Montana, and this agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Montana both as to interpretation and performance.
ENFORCEMENT AND GOVERNING LAW The provisions of this Agreement shall be regarded as divisible and separate; if any of said provisions should be declared invalid or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the validity and enforceability of the remaining provisions shall not be affected thereby. This Agreement shall be construed and the legal relations of the parties hereto shall be determined in accordance with the laws of the State of Illinois without reference to the law regarding conflicts of law.
Choice of Law The validity, interpretation, construction and performance of this Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California.
Standing and Choice of Law That each State Mortgage Regulator has standing to enforce this Agreement in the judicial or administrative process otherwise authorized under the laws and regulations of the corresponding Participating State. Upon entry, this Agreement shall be deemed a final order of each respective State Mortgage Regulator unless adoption of a subsequent order is necessary under the laws of the corresponding Participating State. In the event of any disagreement between any State Mortgage Regulator and Respondent regarding the enforceability or interpretation of this Agreement and compliance therewith, the courts or administrative agency authorized under the laws of the corresponding Participating State shall have exclusive jurisdiction over the dispute, and the laws of the Participating State shall govern the interpretation, construction, and enforceability of this Agreement.
Forum and Choice of Law The parties deem the Contract to have been made in the City of Hartford, State of Connecticut. Both parties agree that it is fair and reasonable for the validity and construction of the Contract to be, and it shall be, governed by the laws and court decisions of the State of Connecticut, without giving effect to its principles of conflicts of laws. To the extent that any immunities provided by Federal law or the laws of the State of Connecticut do not bar an action against the State, and to the extent that these courts are courts of competent jurisdiction, for the purpose of venue, the complaint shall be made returnable to the Judicial District of Hartford only or shall be brought in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut only, and shall not be transferred to any other court, provided, however, that nothing here constitutes a waiver or compromise of the sovereign immunity of the State of Connecticut. The Contractor waives any objection which it may now have or will have to the laying of venue of any Claims in any forum and further irrevocably submits to such jurisdiction in any suit, action or proceeding.
Choice of Law and Jurisdiction California law, without regard to its choice-of-law provisions, governs this Agreement. The parties shall attempt in good faith to resolve informally and promptly any dispute that arises under this Agreement. Jurisdiction for any legal action arising from this Agreement shall exclusively reside in state or federal courts located in California, and the parties hereby consent to the jurisdiction of such courts.
Valid Choice of Law The choice of laws of the State of New York as the governing law of this Agreement is a valid choice of law under the laws of such Selling Stockholder’s jurisdiction of organization (if other than the United States) and will be honored by the courts of such Selling Stockholder’s jurisdiction of organization (if other than the United States). The Selling Stockholder has the power to submit, and pursuant to Section 18(c) of this Agreement, has legally, validly, effectively and irrevocably submitted, to the personal jurisdiction of each New York State and United States federal court sitting in the City of New York and has validly and irrevocably waived any objection to the laying of venue of any suit, action or proceeding brought in such court.
Choice of Law; Jurisdiction This Agreement shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of New York without regard to the principles of conflict of laws. The parties further agree that any action between them shall be heard in New York County, New York, and expressly consent to the jurisdiction and venue of the Supreme Court of New York, sitting in New York County, New York and the United States District Court of the Southern District of New York, sitting in New York, New York, for the adjudication of any civil action asserted pursuant to this Agreement.
Validity of Choice of Law The choice of the law of the State of New York as the governing law of this Agreement and the Deposit Agreement (collectively, the “Transaction Documents”) are valid choices of law under the laws of Japan and will be honored by courts in Japan, subject to the conditions and restrictions described under the caption “Enforceability of Civil Liabilities” in the Registration Statement, the General Disclosure Package and the Prospectus and to compliance with relevant civil procedural requirements (which do not involve a re-examination of the merits of the claim) in Japan. The Company has the power to submit, and pursuant to Section 8(g) of this Agreement and Section 7.6 of the Deposit Agreement has legally, validly, effectively and irrevocably submitted, to the non-exclusive personal jurisdiction of (i) with respect to proceedings arising out of this Agreement, any New York State or United States federal court located in the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, (each, a “New York Court”), and (ii) with respect to proceedings arising under the Deposit Agreement, any state or federal court in the State of New York. The Company has the power to designate, appoint and authorize, and pursuant to Section 8(h) of this Agreement, has legally, validly, effectively and irrevocably designated, appointed an authorized agent for service of process in any action arising out of or relating to this Agreement or the Securities in any New York Court, and service of process effected on such authorized agent will be effective to confer valid personal jurisdiction over the Company as provided in Section 8(g) of this Agreement.
