Engineering Analyses and Reporting. The field and laboratory data will be summarized in an engineering report. Analyses of these data will be presented, and recommendations made in accordance with the Fort Bend County Criteria. The following geotechnical information and recommendations will be provided: The field and laboratory data will be presented in a geotechnical report. Geotechnical analyses will be conducted using the field and laboratory test data to provide geotechnical data for the design and construction of the proposed improvements, including the following: Boring logs and boring logs profiles showing the generalized soils stratigraphy and groundwater levels. Description of onsite soil types and potential use of these materials for fill in structural and non-structural areas. Preliminary fault review based on the review of the available fault maps. Recommendations for the site preparation and embankment construction. Pavement design in accordance with Xxxxxx County criteria and forecast traffic, including required pavement and subbase thicknesses, subgrade preparation and stabilization, reinforcement design, and pavement construction criteria. Geotechnical parameters for the design of embankments, and global slope stability analyses \\atl-server\GEO\Proposal\2019\CP19-1102 Pecan-CedarRD Bridges\Pecan & Cedar Creek\CP19-1102 Pecan & Cedar Creek Bridges.doc of the embankments. Deep foundation recommendations for the bridge, including capacity curves for driven piles and drilled shafts, and foundation construction recommendations. Feasible foundation types and allowable bearing capacity and lateral load analyses for the embankment. Discussion of the results of slope stability analyses for the design cross-sections along the project alignment and evaluating global and local slope stability in terms of End of Construction, Long Term and Rapid Drawdown conditions. Discussion of the onsite soils dispersiveness, and recommendations for erosion protection of the repaired slope soils. Discuss of onsite soil types and the suitability of onsite soils for use as fill in the slope. Dewatering considerations and recommendations. Construction considerations One (1) electronic PDF copy of the draft geotechnical report will be submitted. Once we have received the review comments, a final report addressing the review comments will be issued. Two
Appears in 2 contracts
Samples: Agreement for Professional Engineering Services, Professional Services
Engineering Analyses and Reporting. The field and laboratory data will be summarized in an engineering report. Analyses of these data will be presented, and recommendations made in accordance with the Fort Bend County CriteriaEngineering Guidelines. The following geotechnical information and recommendations will be provided: The field and laboratory data will be presented in a geotechnical report. Geotechnical analyses will be conducted using the field and laboratory test data to provide geotechnical data for the design and construction of the proposed improvements, including (but not limited to) the following: Boring logs and boring logs profiles showing the generalized Generalized soils stratigraphy Piezometer installation and groundwater levels. Description of onsite soil types and potential use of these materials for fill in structural and non-structural areas. measurements Preliminary fault review based on the review of the available fault maps. maps Excavation and trench construction and safety requirements Recommendations regarding bedding and backfill for the site preparation utilities construction Loads on buried pipes including dead and embankment construction. live loads (vehicle loads) Pavement design in accordance with Xxxxxx County criteria Recommendations regarding paving including thickness and forecast traffic, including required pavement and subbase thicknessesreinforcement design, subgrade preparation and stabilization, reinforcement designpavement construction based on Fort Bend County Guidelines. Storm sewer installations, and pavement construction criteria. Geotechnical parameters for the design of embankments, and global slope stability analyses \\atl-server\GEO\Proposal\2019\CP19-1102 Pecan-CedarRD Bridges\Pecan & Cedar Creek\CP19-1102 Pecan & Cedar Creek Bridges.doc of the embankments. Deep foundation recommendations for the bridge, including capacity curves for driven piles and drilled shafts, and foundation construction recommendations. Feasible foundation types and allowable bearing capacity and lateral load analyses for the embankment. Discussion of the results of slope stability analyses for the design cross-sections along the project alignment and evaluating global and local slope stability in terms of End of Construction, Long Term and Rapid Drawdown conditions. Discussion of the onsite soils dispersiveness, and recommendations for erosion protection of the repaired slope soils. Discuss of onsite soil types and the suitability of onsite soils for use as fill in the slope. Dewatering considerations and recommendations. Construction considerations consideration. One (1) electronic PDF copy of the draft geotechnical report will be submitted. Once we have received the review comments, a final report addressing the review comments will be issued. TwoOne (1) copies of final report and an electronic copy (PDF) of the final report will also be issued. Based on the scope of work outlined above, we estimate the cost for field, laboratory, and engineering services for the geotechnical services presented in this proposal to be $16,260.00 (including coring for pavement, flag man, and Peace Officer). The cost estimates using the estimated project quantities and requirements are presented in the enclosed Itemized Geotechnical Fee Estimate spreadsheet. This estimate assumes: underground utilities at proposed boring locations will be cleared by One Call Service and/or private property maintenance personnel; boring locations and elevations will be surveyed by others; and that the sites will be accessible to our truck-mounted equipment; and, environmental sampling/ handling/ transportation/ disposal are not in the scope of this project.
Appears in 2 contracts
Samples: Professional Services, Professional Services
Engineering Analyses and Reporting. The field and laboratory data will be summarized in an engineering report. Analyses of these data will be presented, and recommendations made in accordance with the Fort Bend County Criteria. The following geotechnical information and recommendations will be provided: The field and laboratory data will be presented in a geotechnical report. Geotechnical analyses will be conducted using the field and laboratory test data relative to provide geotechnical data for the design and construction of the proposed improvements, including the following: Boring logs and boring logs profiles showing the generalized Facility Recommendations General o Summary. o Project site pictures. o Geology. o Generalized soils stratigraphy and groundwater levels. Description o Boring logs per GET format. Proposal No. P21-071-1 GEOTECH ENGINEERING AND TESTING Facility Recommendations Road Paving o Estimated subgrade properties (based on correlations) including CBR and Resilient Modulus values for natural soils. o Concrete pavement design, using AASHTO 1993 pavement design method. The client will provide traffic loading in the form of onsite ESAL. o Concrete pavement recommendations. o Pavement steel placement and spacing. o Soil stabilization requirements for the pavements. o Potential construction problems. o Recommendations on site drainage. Storm Sewers o In the event that open excavation is used, we will provide bedding, backfilling, excavation wall and bottom stability, thrust restraint, dewatering, pipe design parameters. o In the event that augering is used, we will provide, soil types design parameters, ground stability, auger pit excavation stability and potential use dewatering. Detention Pond (Optional) o OSHA soil classification for the trench safety. o Recommendations on design of these materials for fill in structural and non-structural areas. Preliminary fault review the detention pond, including the recommended slope ratios based on the review of the available fault mapsfurnished cross sections. A detailed slope- stability analysis will be conducted. The slope-stability studies will be per HCFCD Requirements. o Computerized slope-stability recommendations for short-term, long-term and rapid draw down conditions. o Boring logs per HCFCD format. o Recommended slope ratios and erosion protection. o Recommendations on subsoil dispersive characteristics. o Seepage and bottom blow up recommendations. Proposal No. P21-071-1 GEOTECH ENGINEERING AND TESTING Facility Recommendations Detention Pond (Optional) o OSHA soil classification for the site preparation and embankment constructiontrench safety. Pavement design in accordance with Xxxxxx County criteria and forecast traffico Trench safety report o Erosion recommendations, including required pavement and subbase thicknesses, subgrade preparation and the use of grass for erosion protection. o Recommendations on subsoil stabilization, reinforcement designif necessary. o Recommendations on the use of excavated materials as fill, and pavement construction criteria. Geotechnical parameters for the design of embankments, and global slope stability analyses \\atl-server\GEO\Proposal\2019\CP19-1102 Pecan-CedarRD Bridges\Pecan & Cedar Creek\CP19-1102 Pecan & Cedar Creek Bridges.doc of the embankments. Deep foundation recommendations for the bridge, including capacity curves for driven piles and drilled shafts, and foundation construction recommendations. Feasible foundation types and allowable bearing capacity and lateral load analyses for the embankment. Discussion of the results of slope stability analyses for the design cross-sections along the project alignment and evaluating global and local slope stability in terms of End of Construction, Long Term and Rapid Drawdown conditions. Discussion of the onsite soils dispersiveness, and recommendations for erosion protection of the repaired slope soils. Discuss of onsite soil types and the suitability of onsite soils for use as fill in the slope. Dewatering considerations and recommendations. Construction considerations One (1) electronic PDF copy of the draft geotechnical report will be submitted. Once we have received the review comments, a final report addressing the review comments will be issued. Twoper HCFCD requirements.
Appears in 2 contracts
Samples: Agreement for Professional Engineering Services, Agreement for Professional Engineering Services
Engineering Analyses and Reporting. The field and laboratory data will be summarized in an engineering report. Analyses of these data will be presented, and recommendations made in accordance with the Fort Bend County Criteria. The following geotechnical information and recommendations will be provided: The field and laboratory data will be presented in a geotechnical report. Geotechnical analyses will be conducted using the field and laboratory test data to provide geotechnical data for the design and construction of the proposed improvements, including the following: • Boring logs and boring logs profiles showing the generalized soils stratigraphy and groundwater levels. • Description of onsite soil types and potential use of these materials for fill in structural and non-structural areas. • Preliminary fault review based on the review of the available fault maps. • Recommendations for the site preparation and embankment construction. • Pavement design in accordance with Xxxxxx Harris County criteria and forecast traffic, including required pavement and subbase thicknesses, subgrade preparation and stabilization, reinforcement design, and pavement construction criteria. • Geotechnical parameters for the design of embankments, and global slope stability analyses \\atl-server\GEO\Proposal\2019\CP19-1102 Pecan-CedarRD Bridges\Pecan & Cedar Creek\CP19-1102 Pecan & Cedar Creek Bridges.doc of the embankments. • Deep foundation recommendations for the bridge, including capacity curves for driven piles and drilled shafts, and foundation construction recommendations. • Feasible foundation types and allowable bearing capacity and lateral load analyses for the embankment. • Discussion of the results of slope stability analyses for the design cross-sections along the project alignment and evaluating global and local slope stability in terms of End of Construction, Long Term and Rapid Drawdown conditions. • Discussion of the onsite soils dispersiveness, and recommendations for erosion protection of the repaired slope soils. • Discuss of onsite soil types and the suitability of onsite soils for use as fill in the slope. • Dewatering considerations and recommendations. • Construction considerations One (1) electronic PDF copy of the draft geotechnical report will be submitted. Once we have received the review comments, a final report addressing the review comments will be issued. Two
Appears in 1 contract
